PPT-Assessment Feedback: Evaluating the use of

screencasting Mandy Lee Sue Norman Sarah Whitehouse Dr Marcus Witt Education ACE UWE Learning and Teaching Conference 21 st June 2016 Background and literature Introduction. In evaluating the relevance of a programme or a project it is useful to consider the following questions To what extent are the objectives of the programme still valid Are the activities and outputs of the programme consistent with the overall goal Adam Crymble. Plan for Today. Background . lecture. Discussion of experience with digital archives. Workshop: evaluating a historical website. Time to start drafting blog post. Terminology. Archive. Evaluating Sources. . WITNESSING. AND . EVANGELISM. Lesson 12 for June 23, 2012.  . The . Bible shows that we must evaluate (examine) ourselves, the Church members and the Church itself. Why is this evaluation necessary. CAMPO’s Findings from Testing Various Feedback Approaches. TRB Applications Conference. May 11, 2011. Session 18B. Feedback on Feedback: . CAMPO’s Findings from Testing Various Feedback Approaches. Dr Gwyneth Hughes. Dr Holly Smith . Tim Neumann. Assessment Careers. 3 year project funded by JISC with the aim of using technology to enhance assessment and feedback. Project video. www.ioe.ac.uk/assessmentcareers. Bill Hutchins. &. A J Kendrick. 1. Objectives. Understand the importance of self- assessment in maximizing your leadership potential.. View self-assessment as a valuable avenue for receiving feedback.. Dr. Venda Louise Pollock & Chris Jones (Fine Art). Sandy Alden & Brenda Wilkinson (Student Wellbeing) with James Ricketts as student lead. Creative Difference. CONTEXT. :. Assessment & feedback identified as problematic within A&D subject areas (Vaughan & . Teachers of Teachers of Mathematics Conference. September 7, 2012. Ashland, . Oregon. Nicole Miller Rigelman. Portland State University. rigelman@. pdx.edu. Assessment . can. contribute to the development of effective schools.. the Future. Sue Gill, QuILT and Rachael Thornton, NUSU. Background . Sector wide concerns about assessment and feedback. NSS not the only driver. Staff concerns too. Our plan. Building on previous joint campaign. Overview. What is science?. Science vs. pseudoscience. Scientific . method and . critique. How do we generate research ideas?. Ideas from theory. Ideas from other sources. How do we evaluate research ideas?. A Sectoral Approach to Change. Dr. . Geraldine O’Neill, 14. th. March . 2017, AHEAD. . National Forum for the Enhancement of . Teaching and Learning. . . Learner . variability. Students As . Partners . Dublin City University. January 2013. Sally Brown. http://sally-. brown.net. Emerita Professor, Leeds Metropolitan University,. Adjunct Professor, University of the Sunshine Coast, Central Queensland and James Cook University Queensland. What comes to mind when you hear the phrase “evaluating information”? What comes to mind when you hear the phrase “evaluating information”? Comprehension Reliability Author Authority Analyzing Bias Agenda. Effective online feedback: What does the research say? . Feedback in Canvas discussions. Feedback in Canvas quizzes. Feedback in Canvas assignments. Performance task: Create an assignment with corrective, suggestive, and epistemic feedback. .