consent Documentation Wendy Lloyd BA LPN CIPCCRP Regulatory Compliance Analyst Objectives Regulations and IRB Policies Suggestions of what to include in the documentation Citations when documentation is not present ID: 532895
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Part 3 of 3 part series: Informed" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Part 3 of 3 part series: Informed consent: Documentation
Wendy Lloyd
BA, LPN,
CIP,CCRP
Regulatory
Compliance AnalystSlide2
Objectives:
Regulations and IRB
Policies
Suggestions
of what to include in the
documentation
Citations when documentation is not present
Examples
of documentation of the consent
processSlide3
If you didn’t document it, you didn’t do it!Slide4
Remember when…
7/20/11- 915AM
Pt
Alert and Oriented X 3, skin W and D, VS stable, Resting quietly. Able to assist with bathing minimal amount. SOB during exertion. Incision 1 ½ inches wide and 2 ¾ inches long. Drainage is light green color.
Drsg
Δ
per MD orders.
WLloyd LPN
118 PM
Pt
complained of incision pain and given
percocet
X 2
WLloyd LPN
515 PM Patient ambulated ½ length of hall with minimal SOB. No c/o pain offered.
WLloyd LPN
822
PM
Drsg
Δ
per MD orders
. Minimal amount of purulent drainage noted.
Pt
tolerated
drsg
change well.
P
t
afebrile with VSS. Family at bedside.
WLloyd LPN
1125
PM
Patient requested pain medication for migraine headache. Percocet X 2 provided. Patient laying in bed with lights out. Call light within reach.
WLloyd
LPN
120 AM Patient resting quietly in bed with eyes closed.
WLloyd LPNSlide5
Today…
Check boxes almost replace narrative chartingSlide6
Regulations 45 CFR 46.117
(a) Except as provided in
paragraph (c
) of this section
,
informed
consent shall
be documented by the use of
a written
consent
form approved by
the IRB
and signed by the subject or
the subject’s
legally authorized representative.
A
copy shall be given
to the
person signing
the form.
(b) Except as provided in
paragraph (c
) of this section, the
consent
form may
be either
of the following:
(1) A
written
consent document
that This form may
be read to the subject or the
subject’s legally
authorized
representative, but
in any event, the
investigator shall
give either the subject or the
representative adequate
opportunity
to read
it before it is signed; or
(2) A
short form
written consent
document presented orally Slide7
IV.b.I.F Procedure for Documentation of Informed Consent for Human Subjects
Research
The person obtaining consent should document the consent
process in
the participant’s
medical record
or
the participant’s
research record
. This may include:
How
consent was
obtained;
T
he
participant’s level of comprehension
;
The
participant’s decision-making capacity at the time of
consent;
The
time given for the participant to consider the research and whether others were involved in the decision-making;
and
Identify
who was present during the consenting process.Slide8
45 CFR 46.117 (c) Waiver
of
documentation
(
c)
An IRB may waive the requirement for the investigator to obtain a
signed consent
form for some or all subjects if it finds either
:
(
1) That the
only record linking
the subject and the research
would be the consent document and the
principal risk would be potential harm resulting from a breach of confidentiality.
Each subject will be asked whether the subject wants documentation linking the subject with the research, and the subject's wishes will govern;
OR
(2
) That the research presents
no more than minimal risk of harm
to subjects and
involves no procedures for which written consent is normally required
outside of the research context
.Slide9
Do we still have to document the consent process if waiver granted?
Yes,
unless
both the process and documentation of the process has been waived
Process
DocumentSlide10
45 CFR 46.116 (d) general requirements of informed consent
(d
) An IRB may approve a
consent procedure
which does not include, or which
alters, some or all of the elements
of informed consent set forth in this section, or
waive the requirements to obtain informed consent
provided the IRB finds and documents that
:
The
research involves no more than
minimal risk
to the subjects
;
The
waiver or alteration will
not adversely affect the rights
and welfare of the subjects
;
The
research
could not practicably be carried
out without the waiver or alteration;
and
Whenever
appropriate, the subjects will be
provided with additional pertinent information
after participation.Slide11
Where documentation of consent may occur:
Research Chart
Progress
Notes
MD dictation
CRC chartSlide12
Assure all documentation is consistent with:
Medical history and hospital records
MD dictation
Clinic & office charts
Lab results
Communications (telephone and emails)
Checklists
Flow charts
Diaries
Research charts
Drug d
ispensing records
Procedure reports (UGI, CT, XRAY, EKG etc.)Slide13
What to documentSlide14
How consent obtained
Private exam room
Orally presented consent document information
Consent explained over telephone Slide15
The participant’s level of comprehension
Did child appear to want to participate
Did the subject appear to understand
Did subject
ask questions,
Was subject able
to reiterate
the
main purpose of the
study,
procedures
,
risks
,
f
requency of visits
etc. Slide16
The participant’s decision-making capacity at the time of consent
Alert and oriented
Comatose
Under influence of medication
Decreased level of consciousnessSlide17
Time given for participant to consider the research
Allowed time to review
Subject allowed to take the consent home to review
Mailed consent to subject prior to office visit
Consent read and explained to subject
Consent email/faxed
No original signed consent due to
subject faxed consent back to
officeSlide18
Identify who was present during the process
Family member present
Subject alone
Mother and father present
Surrogate
LAR
TranslatorSlide19
Special study requirements or circumstances
Double barrier pregnancy methods
Pregnancy test results
Wash out periods for previous medications
Diary reviewedSlide20
State
that a
copy of the consent
was given to the person
signing consentSlide21
What came first, The chicken or the Egg?
Document
consent obtained prior to study procedures conductedSlide22
Special circumstances require more documentation
New information- new consent
Legally authorized Representative
Health Care Decision Maker
Subject physically unable
to sign consent
(i.e.
bandaged hands, loss of limbs, contact
isolation etc.)
Subject not able to read a consent form (
i.e. illiteracy
, vision-impairment
)
Signature illegible
Screen failure
Change in cognitive status
Ward of the state
Subject becomes incarcerated
Birth control (double barrier)
Non
English
speaking consent processSlide23
Re-consenting requires the same documentation
Date of
consent
Subject reviewed consent
Revisions verbally explained to the subject
Subjects verbally agrees to continue participation
Copy of revised consent given to subjectSlide24
The patient becomes competent! Document:
Subjects desire to
continue,
Entire consent
process repeated
and copy
given to subject
Subjects revocation
:
The health care provider to whom the patient communicates a revocation is responsible for documenting the revocation in the Patient’s medical record
and
for informing the rest of the health care team about the revocation
. Slide25
When is it time to document?
Every time you have an interaction with a subjects
Contact for recruitment purposes
Emails
Telephone calls
Face to face interactions
Assessment of adverse events each visit
Assessment of cognitive status each visit
No family available to consent
During
each visit ask if subject desires
to continue in the research
Slide26
Is it ever ok not to document the process?
Certificate of Confidentiality
Waiver of DOCUMENTATION
approval from the IRBSlide27
Key Points
Remember, organizing your paperwork can be as important as dispensing the right
drug
Researchers protect human subjects by having paperwork in
order
Tell a story in chronological order that is accurate and
factual
Keep files secured
L
ocked cabinet/room
Password protected accessSlide28
Examples of documentationSlide29
Date of Consent:_________ Name of Study: ____________IRB Study Number:_______________
Patient Name:_____________ Patient MRN:____________ Study ID#:_____________________
The following has been explained to the potential study subject, and the subject has been offered the opportunity to ask questions regarding the study:
TOPIC
COMMENTS
Purpose of the study _________________________________
Qualifications to participate _________________________________
Location and participants _________________________________
What will happen during the study _________________________________
Risk and benefits _________________________________
Study related injury or illness _________________________________
Alternative treatments _________________________________
Confidentiality _________________________________
Study costs _________________________________
Compensation _________________________________
Who to contact with questions _________________________________
Voluntary participation _________________________________
Termination of participation _________________________________
Questions or comments: __________________________________________________________________
Does the patient state an understanding of the study and procedures and agree to participate?
___yes ___no
_____________________________________ __________________________
Person administering consent Date / Time
Signed copy given to patient? ___yes ___no Copy in patients chart? ___yes ___no
Informed Consent WorksheetSlide30
Template Screening Visit Example
DMID Protocol:
xx-
xxxx
Site
:
Vanderbilt
University Medical Center
Date
:
____________
Subject
Initials
:
____________
Subject ID:
____________
This subject is here for the Screening Visit. The subject was given a copy of the IRB approved consent form dated 13Jun2011. The subject was given ample time to read the consent and ask questions. All questions were answered per the subject’s satisfaction, and the subject denied any further questions or concerns. The consent was signed and dated by the subject and the study staff, and a copy was given to the subject. The consent was signed and dated prior to any study procedures being performed. Eligibility criteria and medical history were reviewed, and a complete physical exam was performed by _____________________ and vital signs were obtained. A blood draw was obtained by ___________________________ per Vanderbilt policy. The subject verbalized understanding that they will be contacted with results of the screening labs, and will then be scheduled for the enrollment visit. The subject was given contact information to contact the study staff with any questions or concerns.
Signature
:____________________________________________Date
:________Slide31
Screening Visit Narrative
Patient
presents today to Screen for the PANTHER study. He is well versed in this protocol and self-
admittantly
has read/reviewed the consent
many times
. We met about two weeks ago and had a face-to-face meeting (with
his wife
present) and discussed the study and I answered all his questions.
Today
he is here to screen and states that all his questions have
been answered
. He voluntarily signed the consent. He agrees to participate
in all
the associated sub-studies except Sub-Study # 4 (HRCT
comparison) preferring
to not be exposed to more radiation than necessary
for diagnostic
purposes. He has a copy of this consent.Slide32
Documentation example
11/28/2013:
1 PM: Received referral from Lee Smith, M.D. of subject’s intended participation in clinical research study, M04-691, A double-blinded…..
Subject and significant other seen in GI clinic and verbally reviewed consent form; explained the purpose of the study, benefits to subject and mankind, expected duration of participation, subject risks and inconveniences, subject accountability for clinic visits and recoding of weekly diary, confidentiality and ability to withdraw from study at any time without penalty or loss of treatment or benefits, compensation and coverage for injury while involved in study and emergency contact information. Subject given time to review consent form and ask questions.
Questions regarding prep or flex
sigmoidoscopy
on Day 1 and how results of the study could be obtained answered.
Subject signed consent form and was given a copy. To begin screening on
12/1/2013.Slide33
Example of on study visit documentation
TRAUMA RESEARCH PROGRESS NOTE
Date:__________
Patient was seen today for Day (ENTER 1-14, 30, End of Treatment, TOC, LFU, discharge, End of Study) visit. All procedures performed per protocol. Patient is unable to provide consent at this time secondary to medical condition. Family is (available / unavailable) at bedside. We will continue to follow this patient closely.
ENTER FREE TEXT HERE
SIGNATURESlide34
What if I make a mistake?
Correct errors based on
Institutional policy (corrections
and approved abbreviations)
Departmental SOP’s
Sponsor SOP’s
ICG-GCP (4.9.3)
initialed
, and explained
should
not obscure the original entry (i.e., an audit trail
should be
maintained);
C
ross error out with a single line
6/14/14
WL
Pt
c/o
pain to
back shoulders…
NO backdatingSlide35
Problems that occur when documentation is non-existent Slide36
Audit findings at sites
All
required signatures and dates not completed at time of consent or completed with different dates
Multiple
consent documents for same patients with no explanation
why
Signatures
of subject and consenting person on different dates
Consent and study procedures on same date
Copy
of consent provided to subject not documented
Check boxes within the consent incomplete
Crossed out sections or white out used in the IRB approved consent
Unable to locate consent for subject on study
Person
consenting
the
subject did not sign the formSlide37
FDA findings
Failure to obtain written informed consent or back-dating
Sloppy
records (e.g. erase, white-out)
Creating
fake records or subjects
Altering
subject diaries to reflect a positive outcome
Destroying
study
records
orSlide38
FDA Inspection
Common Deficiencies
Inadequate consent 51%
Protocol Non-adherence 31%
Records Inadequate/Inaccurate
26
%
Drug Accountability Inadequate
20
%
IRB deficiencies 11%
http://www.irbforum.org/documents/documents/Module4.pdf
Slide39
FDA Warning letter Dated back to 2008
….a
number of my signatures and parent
signatures
as well as initials on consent forms were forged presumably by my research
nurse
Documentation of the consent process missing
Corrective Action Plan
Research staff educated in various topics including institutional policies and good clinical practice
Documentation template per PI:
that
XX study was explained, questions were
answered
(if any), subject agreed to participate and signed the consent form, the date and time of consent/assent (filled in by the consenting individuals), all option sections were completed (if any), and a copy of the signed and dated consent form was given to subject and placed in the medical record Slide40
In summary
Slide41
Good documentation is:
Consistent
,
Concise,
Chronological
,
Continuing
,
CompleteSlide42
Documentation Do’s:
Include any and all
research
encounters
Should
occur immediately to recall as many details as possible
Should
include the nature, discussion and outcome of each research
encounter
Should
be included in the research and/or medical record and be kept
confidential
Should be legible, factual and thorough
Include a copy of the consent document given to the subject
If applicable, include withdrawal or discontinuation with the reason(s)
Include
as many details as possible regarding adverse events and any events leading up to an adverse event whether it is deemed related or
not
Should tell a story from beginning to end Slide43
Documentation Don’t’s:
Use
white out
Obscure original entry
Back date
Fabricate the information
Delay charting
Assume people know
your process and what
you didSlide44
Documentation is up to
YOU
Take credit for ALL you do and tell the storySlide45
Helpful resources:
Documentation
of informed consent
http://
www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=50.27
Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) informed consent tips
http://
www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/index.html
http://
answers.hhs.gov/ohrp/search/results?q=informed%20consent
OHRP informed consent FAQ
http://
answers.hhs.gov/ohrp/categories/1566
Vanderbilt IRB Policy
http://mcapps01.mc.vanderbilt.edu/IRB/policy&procedures.nsf/(WebTableOfContents)/
8AF759048966C29D86257731005ECD1F?OpenDocumentSlide46
If you have additional comments or questions feel free to contact me
Wendy Lloyd
Wendy.lloyd@vanderbilt.edu
615-936-7106