/
Physical Properties of Physical Properties of

Physical Properties of - PowerPoint Presentation

giovanna-bartolotta
giovanna-bartolotta . @giovanna-bartolotta
Follow
447 views
Uploaded On 2016-02-24

Physical Properties of - PPT Presentation

Decameterscale Asteroids Andrew Rivkin JHUAPL Target NEO 2 Workshop Washington DC Getting us on the same page Compositionsalbedosdensitiesetc go together often assume other pieces when only one thing known ID: 229738

asteroids albedo size neos albedo asteroids neos size complex objects sizes meteorite surveys period neo albedos larger ratio assuming

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Physical Properties of" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Physical Properties of Decameter-scale Asteroids

Andrew Rivkin (JHU/APL)

Target NEO 2 Workshop

Washington DCSlide2

Getting us on the same page

Compositions/albedos/densities/etc. go together, often assume other pieces when only one thing known

S/Q complex, albedo ~0.2-0.3,

3 g cm-3, OC meteoritesC complex, albedo ~0.04-0.08, 2 g cm-3, CC meteorites, water/organicsX complex, albedo ~0.04-0.5, 2-8 g cm-3, iron meteorites or CC meteorites or aubrites or…?(Lunar rocks, albedo ~0.1-0.3, 3 g cm-3 look like S/D asteroids?)Higher albedos associated with anhydrous bodies

“Key” of 0.5-2.5 µm spectral shapes

from DeMeo et al. (2009)Slide3

Getting us on the same page

Rarely have measured sizes, just

brightnesses

Use absolute magnitude H as proxy for size 8 m ~ H=28 for average albedo, 27.2 for S-like albedo, 29-29.5 for C-like albedo Data scarce for these sizes, extrapolate from larger sizes and assuming similar mix. May be off!

“Key” of 0.5-2.5 µm spectral shapes

from

DeMeo

et al. (2009)Slide4

Getting us on the same page

Rarely have measured sizes, just

brightnesses

Use absolute magnitude H as proxy for size 8 m ~ H=28 for average albedo, 27.2 for S-like albedo, 29-29.5 for C-like albedo Data scarce for these sizes, extrapolate from larger sizes and assuming similar mix. May be off!Slide5

Meteorite falls

give direct info about 0.1-10 m scale objects in NEO population

80% ordinary chondrite (OC), 4% carbonaceous chondrites (CC)

8% achondrites (5% HED), 6% iron, 1% stony-ironNotable meteorite parent bodies Tagish Lake, Carancas, Peekskill, TC3 ~3-4 mChelyabinsk ~15 mGold Basin L4 6-8 m diameterThese may not match what’s out in space!Weaker material screened out at various stagesMeteorites needn’t be on low delta-v orbits! What do we know about 10-m class asteroids compositionally?Slide6

Visible-wavelength surveys biased against low-albedo objects (q.v. Mainzer

in re IR surveys)

Debiased

surveys suggest NEO “dark to bright ratio” of 1.6 (Stuart and Binzel 2004)C:S ratio 1:2.2X complex ~33% of NEOs, spans large albedo range: wildcard.Based on ~1 km+ targets, caveat scientificus.Few spectra at H>26: 2 C-ish, one S (Polishook et al., Hicks and Rhoades) What do we know about 10-m class asteroids compositionally?Slide7

Visible-wavelength surveys biased against low-albedo objects (q.v. Mainzer

in re IR surveys)

Debiased

surveys suggest NEO “dark to bright ratio” of 1.6 (Stuart and Binzel 2004)C:S ratio 1:2.2X complex ~33% of NEOs, spans large albedo range: wildcard.Based on ~1 km+ targets, caveat scientificus.Few spectra at H>26: 2 C-ish, one S (Polishook et al., Hicks and Rhoades) Getting albedos will be critical!H = 27.2 for S/Q = 8 m, but for C = 24 mH= 29 for C = 8 m, but for S/Q = 3 mWhat do we know about 10-m class asteroids compositionally?Slide8

Constraints from visible observations

C-complex is 10% (

debiased

) of NEOsCh ~ 0.5% of all NEOs? (Binzel et al. 2004)Few NEOs with measurements in 3-µm regionDifficult measurements due to atmosphere, high NEO temperaturesHydrated CM/CI ~50-60% of CC meteoritesIf CCs are 10% of NEOs, hydrated CCs ~5% of NEOs?Other classes?“Missing” low-albedo X material from meteorites?“Expect” ~1:1 carbonaceous:non-carbonaceous (depending on orbit distributions)WISE studies show low-albedo objects ~ high albedo objects in inner beltHave 1:20-25 in meteorite collectionHydrated minerals in the NEOsSlide9

8-m scale comets?

Theoretically possible: estimates of ~50 5-10 m

Kreutz

sungrazing cometsAt 260 K even buried ice lasts ~1000 yrNEO lifetimes ~1-10 MyVery unlikely to find an icy object! Also very likely to have them in Earth-like orbitsSOHO view of sungrazing comet Slide10

~2-4 meter body discovered 20 hours before impact near Sudan/Egypt border

Rotation period 1.6 minutes

F-class (C-complex) spectrum reported

Recovered as Almahata Sitta meteoriteMostly ureilites (achondrite)20-30% other meteorite types! (Jenniskens et al. 2011)Clearly a rubble pile at top of atmosphere (next talk)!Macroporosity estimated at 20-50% (Kohout et al. 2011)Centimeter-size fragments recovered (but doesn’t rule out larger sizes being present pre-impact)Despite “dark” spectral type, poor in water/OH (but organics present) 2008 TC3Slide11

Spectra of Almahata

Sitta

(2008 TC3)Spectrally, meteorite is all over the placeChips are low albedo, relatively flat spectraAutomated classification of #44 and #36 chips as Ch and CbPowders are a bit higher albedo, but show more S-like spectra.Automated classification of #44 and #36 powders as Q!Demonstrates pitfalls of blindly using associations mentioned above!From Hiroi

et al. 2010Slide12

Name

Diameter

H

Period (m)2001 WJ40.01

27.454.2

2003 WT153

0.007

28

7.02

2005 UW50.00927.514.442006 DD1

0.01526.52.74

2006 MV1

0.013

26.8

5.71

2006 RH120

0.003

29.9

2.750

2008 JL24

0.004

29.6

3.23117

2008 TC3

0.004

30.9

1.6165

2009

FH

0.01

26.6

6.438

2009 KW2

0.014

26.6

3.412

2009 UD 2009

0.01

27.2

1.3948

2009 WV51

0.01127.14.602010 AL300.01127.28.7962010 JL880.01326.80.40982010 TD540.00528.71.3762010 WA 20100.003300.51482011 MD 20110.0072811.622012 BX340.00927.6108.502012 KP240.0226.612.5002012 KT420.00628.793.6342012 TC40.01426.712.23

Asteroids with H>26.5, good quality lightcurves

Assuming albedo 0.17Average size 9 mMedian size 11 m

Average period 12 min(dominated by 1 object)Median period 3.6 min

Mean amplitude 0.69 Axial ratio ~ 1.38:1~6.4x9x9 m to ~7.2x7.2x10 m

Rotation of small NEOsSlide13

Asteroids with H>26.5,

good quality

lightcurves

Assuming albedo 0.17Average size 9 mMedian size 11 mAverage period 12 min(dominated by 1 object)Median period 3.6 min Mean amplitude 0.69 Axial ratio ~ 1.38:1~6.4x9x9 m to ~7.2x7.2x10 mRotation of small NEOsSlide14

What intact, 8-m single objects do we know of?

Hoba

iron meteorite: 2.7x2.7x0.9 m (largest known intact piece)

‘Decameter-scale’ boulders on 2005 YU55Boulders on Eros, ItokawaSlide15

In context:

8-m sized objectsSlide16

For a given brightness, likeliest albedos lead to factor of ~3 uncertainty

in size

factor of ~25-30 in massA combination of preparatory observations and S/C abilities will be needed to reduce or accommodate this factorRange of likely-seeming porosities from zero (if monolith) to 50% (if like larger asteroids, high end of TC3 estimate) → Densities from ~1 g/cm3 - ~3 g/cm3 → another factor of 3 in massI suspect this factor of 3 will be irreducible prior to S/C visitPutting together some uncertaintiesSlide17

Expectations for decameter-scale asteroids extrapolated from larger bodies, informed by meteorite studies

Expect ~5% of NEOs to have hydrated minerals as lower limit

Fraction of X-complex asteroids that are low albedo leads to great uncertainty in understanding in overall population composition

Mission requirements plus wide range of target albedos makes albedo/size measurements imperative!Rotation rates will be fast, likely < 5 minutes Summary