PPT-SAWPA OWOW 2.0 Project Ranking Process
Author : giovanna-bartolotta | Published Date : 2018-03-18
December 6 2012 MultiStep Project Ranking Process OWOW Steering Committee developed five criteria and weights and eight performance measures Criteria equally weighted
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "SAWPA OWOW 2.0 Project Ranking Process" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
SAWPA OWOW 2.0 Project Ranking Process: Transcript
December 6 2012 MultiStep Project Ranking Process OWOW Steering Committee developed five criteria and weights and eight performance measures Criteria equally weighted at 20 each each criteria can contribute a maximum of 20 of the overall project score. Miguel Costa. , Daniel Gomes (speaker). Portuguese Web . Archive. Information Retrieval. is the activity of obtaining . information resources relevant. . to an . information need. from a . collection. at Low Cost. Lavanya Subramanian. , . Donghyuk. Lee, . Vivek. . Seshadri. , . Harsha. . Rastogi. , . Onur. . Mutlu. 1. The Blacklisting Memory Scheduler. Main Memory Interference Problem. Causes interference between applications’ requests. Alexander . Kotov. (UIUC). . Pranam. . Kolari. , Yi . Chang (Yahoo!). Lei . Duan. (Microsoft). Motivation. Improvements in ranking can be achieved in two ways:. Better features/methods for promoting high-quality result pages. Purchasing Atlas power parity methodology (international Ranking Economy (US dollars) Ranking Economy dollars) 1 Monaco .. a 1 Qatar 134,420 2 Liechtenstein .. a 3 Macao SAR, China 120,140 3 Bermuda 1 Raju . Balakrishnan. . rajub@asu.edu. (PhD Dissertation Defense). Committee: Subbarao Kambhampati (chair). Yi Chen. . AnHai. Doan. . Huan. Liu.. Agenda. Part 1: Ranking the Deep Web. SourceRank: Ranking Sources.. W. ho’s #1?. Jonathon Peterson. Purdue University. The Ranking Problem. Why is ranking of sports teams important?. College football – BCS. College basketball – NCAA tournament. Win $1 billion!!!. Use Case Example: ATM Transactions. Ranking by Volumetrics. Peak Rate / Second. Peak Rate Rank. 1 or less. 1. 10. 2. 100. 3. 1000. 4. 10,000 or over. 5. Data Size (Bytes). Data Size Rank. 100 or less. for Information Retrieval. This Talk. Learning to rank for information retrieval. Learning in vector space. Mainly based on papers at SIGIR, WWW, ICML, NIPS, and KDD. Papers at other conferences and journals might not be covered comprehensively.. Jonathan Fryer, Noreen Corcoran, . Brian George, Ed Wang, Deb DaRosa. Northwestern . University Feinberg School of Medicine, . Chicago . Illinois. Resident Selection Process. 1) How . effective is the ranking process in selecting residents who will perform well? . 2016 ESEA Directors Institute. August 23, 2016. Renee Palakovic. Director of Planning. Division of Consolidated Planning & Monitoring. Renee.Palakovic@tn.gov. (615) 253-3786. . Quick review of Title I foundations and purpose. Kai Li, Guo-Jun Qi, Jun Ye, Tuoerhongjiang Yusuph, Kien A. Hua. Department of Computer Science. University of Central Florida. ISM 2016. Presented by . Tuoerhongjiang Yusuph. Introduction. Massive amount of high-dimensional data, high computational costs …. You have chartered a yacht with three friends, for the holiday trip of a lifetime across the Atlantic Ocean. Because none of you have any previous sailing experience, you have hired an experienced skipper and two-person crew. Unfortunately in mid Atlantic a fierce fire breaks out in the ships galley and the skipper and crew have been lost while trying to fight the blaze. Much of the yacht is destroyed and is slowly sinking. Your location is unclear because vital navigational and radio equipment have been damaged in the fire. Your best estimate is that you are many hundreds of miles from the nearest landfall. You and your friends have managed to save 15 items, undamaged and intact after the fire. In addition, you have salvaged a four man rubber life craft and a box of matches. . Hongning Wang. 1. , . Xiaodong. He. 2. , . Ming-Wei Chang. 2. , . Yang . Song. 2. , . Ryen. . W. White. 2. and Wei Chu. 3. 1. Department of Computer Science. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. ECDC TECHNICAL REPORT Best practices in ranking emerging infectious disease threats A literature review ii This report was commissioned by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"SAWPA OWOW 2.0 Project Ranking Process"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents