/
1 Shimon Edelman’s   Riddle of Representation 1 Shimon Edelman’s   Riddle of Representation

1 Shimon Edelman’s Riddle of Representation - PowerPoint Presentation

jane-oiler
jane-oiler . @jane-oiler
Follow
373 views
Uploaded On 2018-03-08

1 Shimon Edelman’s Riddle of Representation - PPT Presentation

two humans a monkey and a robot are looking at a piece of cheese what is common to the representational processes in their visual systems 2 Answer The cheese of course mainstream Gwen ID: 643216

brain mental gwen mind mental brain mind gwen sensory science body study mappings view external cheese animal context important

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "1 Shimon Edelman’s Riddle of Represe..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

1

Shimon Edelman’s Riddle of Representation

two humans, a monkey, and a robot

are looking at a piece of cheese

;

what is common

to

the representational

processes in

their visual systems? Slide2

2

Answer:

The cheese, of courseSlide3

mainstream (Gwen/CogPO) view

[methodological solipsism (the brain we study could equally well be a brain in a vat)]forgets the cheeseSlide4

When neuroscientists see an elephant they see only the calcium phosphate chemistry of the tusk

“The mind is a black box”“Mental processes cannot be observed (except via advanced neuroimaging instruments)”Slide5

Where we agree

Knowledge of brain structure can and should inform our understanding of mental functionWe should not waste time on the mind-body problem Slide6

Where we disagree

Gwen:for science: “every mental process has to be a brain process”

Therefore the only way to study the mind is to study the brain

BS:

we should ensure that we use

all the data we can

to do good scienceSlide7

Communicating about emotions

Affect, feeling, emotion,

mood, passion, sentiment

Anger, astonishment, awe, bliss,

despair, disgust, embarrassment, fear, happiness, hate, joy, love, pride, regret,

resentment

, satisfaction, scorn, shame,

sympathy, terror

7

Image credit:

notarivs

(

flickr

)Slide8

Gwen (CogPO) view

cripples our empirical work on mental functioning nearly all our data in social interaction, emotional experience, mental health, … literature …, DSM, will be dismissed as unscientific

enforcing reduction to mappings between sensory inputs and motor outputs would cripple scienceSlide9

Against Gwen view

mental representation is about a thing in external reality in virtue of mappings among sensory inputs‘some puzzling properties of Mind, such as "aboutness" and subjectivity, can

be understood here in a concrete context, by

considering how

the mind-brain responds to (maps or "represents")

the internal (visceral) and external environment.’Slide10

Pro Gwen view‘mental = neural’ gives a framework for comparative studies – animal models

because animal brains are very like human brainsSlide11

the mainstream viewwould also make cross-organism comparisons difficult, since the kinds of mappings from sensory inputs to external environments differ vastly between, say, spiders and humansSlide12

all of mental functioning controlled by two

bsasic processessensory input+ all the stuff in the middle; working memorycontrol of behavior (motor control, action)

no body, no objects

facial expression

controlled

by the brainSlide13

Cognitive Paradigm Ontology

Jessica“The mental function experimenters claim to be studying is not as important as the methods for studying it”Compare: doing biology is not as important as building the Ontology for Biomedical InvestigationsSlide14

Gwen’s paper:there

is no consensus on how to define mental phenomena within a biological context (other than use of "operational,“ that is, experiment-specific, definitions). The Mind-Body question is usually avoided

in standard textbooks on behavioral and biological psychology.