Erik H Ervin PhD Professor Turfgrass Culture amp Physiology Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences Department eervinvtedu VIRGINIA TECH November 29 2017 MoGIC Schmidt and Ervin definition ID: 742020
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Biostimulants for Putting Greens" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Biostimulants for Putting Greens
Erik H. Ervin, Ph.D.Professor, Turfgrass Culture & PhysiologyCrop and Soil Environmental Sciences Department; eervin@vt.eduVIRGINIA TECH
November 29, 2017,
MoGICSlide2
Schmidt and Ervin definition
A biostimulant is an organic material that, when applied in small quantities, enhances plant growth and development such that the response cannot be attributed to application of traditional plant nutrients, GCM (2002)Slide3
European Biostimulants Industry Council
www.Biostimulants.eu: 2014“Agricultural biostimulants include diverse formulations of compounds, substances and micro-organisms that are applied to plants or soils to improve crop vigour, yields, quality, and tolerance of abiotic stresses.”
“Biostimulants operate through different mechanisms than fertilisers, regardless of the presence of nutrients in the products; they do not have any direct action against pests.”Slide4
Agricultural Uses of Plant Biostimulants
Calvo et al., 2014. Plant and Soil 383:3-41.Microbial inoculantsHumic & fulvic
acidsProtein hydrolysates & amino acidsSeaweed extractsWe’ll review research data from 3 categories with a focus on improved efficiency and tolerance to abiotic stressSlide5
Microbial inoculants
Products containing living organisms that promote growth by several mechanisms such as increasing supply of nutrients, increasing root biomass or area, and increasing nutrient uptake capacity of the plantFree living bacteria, fungi, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) that were isolated from environments such as soil, plants, plant residues, water, and processed manuresSlide6
Microbial inoculants, considerations
Microbes must survive in the commercial formulation; shelf life, temperature effects, UVAre microbes compatible with fertilizers and crop protectants?Slide7
From AAPFCO talk, OR Dept Ag
Serial dilution plating on growth agar of various microbial inoculant products, 2014Bacillus (9 M cfu/ml) on label; no detectionBacillus (35 M cfu/ml) on label;
3000Bacillus (787 K; 5000 detected), Pseudomonas (24 K; no detect), Trichoderma (2.4 K, no detect)Summary: 2 out of 21 formulated products met label guarantee; all numbers dropped while on shelf for 3 months; dry slightly better than liquidSlide8
Microbial inoculants, mechanisms
Nitrogen fixationNutrient solubilizationFe-sequestration via siderophore productionProduction of volatile organic compounds
Production of plant growth hormonesSlide9
5. Microbial inoculants, phytohormones
Production of plant growth regulators (hormones) by bacteria has been reported for over 30 years (Barea et al., 1976).Auxins, cytokinins, gibberellins, and ethylene can be synthesized by rhizosphere bacteria effecting many physiological processes such as root initiation, root elongation, and root hair formationSlide10
Cytokinins
Promote cell division at meristemsIn combination with auxin they regulate ratio of tillering to root initiationRetard senescence and chlorophyll degradation = “Stay-Green” effectBingru Huang’s group at Rutgers has transformed bentgrass (ipt gene) to activate cytokinin synthesis when exposed to heat stress (> 90 F). From: Proc. PGRSA Annual Meeting, 2006.Slide11
Stay-green mutant of corn due to maintenance of high leaf cytokinin levels
Loss of ACC oxidase expression stops ethylene’s effects on cytokinin degradation and senescence is delayed under drought (above) and light deprivation (below)
From: D. R. Gallie, Biochemistry, UC-RiversideSlide12
Root-injection of synthetic cytokinin improved bentgrass heat stress tolerance
Adapted from Liu et al., 2002. Cytokinin effects on creeping bentgrass responses to heat stress. Crop Sci. 42:457-472.
Means are from 56 d of heat treatments and 56 d after Zeatin Riboside (ZR) injection into the root zone; All means are sig diff. at P=0.05Slide13
Adapted from Liu et al., 2002. Cytokinin effects on creeping bentgrass responses to heat stress. Crop Sci. 42:457-472.
Means are from 56 d of heat treatments and 56 d after Zeatin Riboside (ZR) injection into the root zone; All mean comparisons are diff. at P=0.05
Root-injection of synthetic
cytokinin
improved bentgrass heat stress toleranceSlide14
Auxin or IAA
Produced in new leavesCell division & Stem elongationInduction of rootingIn combination with cytokinins they regulate ratio of tillering to root initiation and growthBending of shoots toward light, roots towards gravityIAA overproducing mutants of Arabidopsis are known as “rooty” and “superroot”
Rogg & Bartel. 2001. Developmental Cell. 1(5):595Slide15
Microbial production of
Auxin in Biosolids
Organic matter
Tryptophan
Auxin
Microbial actionSlide16
Auxin Level in BiosolidsDetermined using
BioassayLC/MS/MSBiosolids* contains:
2.1-15.4 ppm
auxin
(average: 8.8 ppm)
*Zhang, Ervin,
Evanylo
, and
Haering
, 2009
Auxin-
13
C
AuxinSlide17
Picture from initial biosolids trial showing improved TF drought resistance due to biosolids-amendment relative to N controlsSlide18
Auxins (IBA drench or in boosted biosolids) improved tall fescue rooting
Drought
Control auxin-biosolids IBA-control Biosolids
A
A
B
B
b
ab
b
aSlide19
Total KBG Root Dry Weight (g/pot) Slide20
Univ of Wisconsin biostimulant research
Objective: determine how certain commercial biostimulants might alter the microbial community in a mature sand-based bentgrass greenTested: Flexx-Plus®
(ben. bacteria = Bacillus sp @ 11 billion cfu/lb)Colonize® T&O (ben. bacteria = Bacillus sp @ 45 billion cfu/lb)
Applied every 2 wk from late May through Aug.
Soil samples taken every 2 wk = 10 sample dates
Kussow, HortScience, 2006Slide21
Authors’ Conclusion: “The treatments did not effectively alter the putting green microbial community in terms of enzyme activities or substrate utilization.” Observed improvements in quality/wilting resistance may have been due to surfactant or SWE in products
Kussow, HortScience, 2006
NS
NS
NS
NS
*Slide22
Humic SubstancesSlide23
Humic Substances defined
Humic substances comprise 60-80% of soil OM and are the components of OM most resistant to microbial decompositionClassified into:Fulvic acid: smallest & soluble in acid & alkaliHumic acid: medium & soluble in alkali
Humin: largest, most persistent, dark, insolubleSourcesLeonardite (mined soft coal, lignite): 30-80% HA, 150 CECPeats: 5-25% HA, Biosolids/Compost: 3-15% HA Slide24
Liquid-applied Humic Substances
At 0.05 to 0.10% HA concentrations have been shown to mimic auxin in promoting root growth.* Are non-humic components (saccharides, organic acids) the biologically active fraction?
HA and FA also chelate Fe, Mg, Zn, Mn in exchangeable forms for more efficient root availabilityNo soil moisture or structural effects predictedVT Research rate is 15 g leonardite/M = ~1.5 lb/A = 0.4% concentration applied in our trials
*O’Donnell, 1973. Soil Sci. 116(2):106-112Slide25
Humic Acid has been shown to increase photosynthesis and root growth
In a greenhouse experiment, Crenshaw bent was grown in solution culture supplied with non-limiting nutrients (no stress) and 3 concentrations of HA.Photosynthesis and root growth was increased significantly from 1 to 4 weeks after treatment by HA at 400 ppm (0.0004%)
VT foliar spray rate ~5000 ppm
Liu, Cooper, Bowman. 1998. HortScience 33:1023-1025Slide26
KBG sod establishment on sand
Two humic sources compared against fertilizer only; fertilizer inputs equalizedPeat based versus leonardite, both applied at 3 oz/M every 2 wks for 6 applications
Table 4. Humic acid (HA) effects on monthly post-transplant root strength measurements of Kentucky bluegrass
Treatment
Root Strength
22 May 2002
21 June 2002
22 July 2002
------------------------------ kg m
-2
------------------------------
Control
367.4a
483.7a†
470.1a‡
Leonardite HA
401.1a
532.6a
587.6b
Peat HA
430.7a
600.5b
593.0b
Root mass
Treatment
--------
mg cm
-3
--------
Control
0.60a‡
Leonardite HA
0.85b
Peat HA
1.06b
34 and 73% transplant rooting increaseSlide27
KBG sod establishment on sand
Ervin et al., 2005. Acta HortSlide28
3. Seaweed ExtractsSlide29
Kelp or Seaweed Extracts (SWE)
Why do they tend to be in every biostimulant?Where do they come from and what’s in them?N. Atlantic rockweed=brown algae=Ascophyllum nodosumSlide30
Composition of Ascophyllum nodosum
alkaline extract
ItemValuepH~10
Carbohydrates
~50%
Amino Acids
~5%
Nitrogen
0.8 to 1.5%
Phosphorus
0.5
to
1.0%
Potassium
14
to 18%
Calcium
0.3 to 0.6%
Sodium
3.0 to 5.0%
Micronutrients
1 to 250 ppm (Fe)
Source: Acadian
Seaplants
Limited, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, 2012 Slide31
Reported Cytokinins and Auxin Contents in Seaweed Extracts (SWE)
Author, year
Cytokinins level, DWMethod
Tay
,
1985
7 µg/L
GC/MS
Sanderson, 1986
1.3 µg/L
GC/MS
Tay
, 1987
13 µg/L
GC/MS
Stirk
, 2004
50 µg/L
Plant bioassay
Ervin, 2004, 2008
70 & 45 µg/L
ELISA
Ervin, 2009
12 µg/L
LC/MS/MS
Wally, 2013
10
µg/L
LC/MS/MS
Auxin (IAA) level
Ervin, 2009
12
µg/L
LC/MS/MS
Wally, 2013
3 to 47 µg/L
LC/MS/MS
Cytokinins
level found in
bentgrass
leaf tissue 5 to 60 ng/g FW*
*Zhang and Ervin. 2004, 2008, 2010.
C
rop Science Slide32
Scientific Consensus on SWE
“The chemical compositions of several seaweed extracts are known, and because they can maintain plant-promoting bioactivity at relatively low concentrations (<0.01% w/v) (Crouch van Staden, 1993), it is unlikely that the growth-promoting ability is due to nutrient composition alone (Wally, 2013).”Similar statements in Blunden 1972, 1991 and Khan et al., 2009.
Blunden, G. 1972. Proc Int Seaweed Symp 7:584-589.Blunden, G. 1991. Seaweed Resources in Europe: uses and potential, pp. 65-81.
Crouch, I.J. and J. van
Staden
. 1993. Plant Growth Regulation. 13:21-29.
Khan W., et al., 2009. J Plant Growth Regulation 28:386-399.
Wally, O.S.D., et al., 2013.
J Plant Growth
Regulation 32:324-339.Slide33
Ervin SWE Research
Products used primarily on putting greensEqualized nutrient inputs, HoaglandsFew commercial products used, just generic alkaline seaweed extracts at 0.15% w/vChallenged bentgrass with drought or heat stressSlide34
Drought in Greenhouse
0.15% w/v SWE solution (estimated 3.5 µg/L cytokinins) or ashed SWE applied 7 d prior to 28-d dry down; complete fertilizer solution supplied evenlyLeaf Cytokinin Relative Levels at Soil Moisture Wilting Point (5%):
Exp. 1 then Exp. 2Control = 100% 100%Ashed SWE = 101% nsSWE = 123% sig 158% sigZhang and Ervin, 2004. Crop Science, 44:1737-1745Slide35
Drought in Greenhouse
We also tested Humic Acid (HA at 0.43% w/v) from leonardite, alone and in combination with SWE
Treatment
PE*
Vit
. E
Shoot
Wt
Root
Wt
CK
HA
0.33b
17.3b
1.28ab
0.80a
19.3b
SWE
0.30b
14.3b
1.46a
0.69b
28.9a
HA + SWE
0.40a
23.7a
1.49a
0.83a
26.6a
Control
0.23c
10.7c
0.96b
0.59b
18.3b
*PE = Photochemical Efficiency (0.7 = healthy); Vitamin E; CK =
Zeatin
riboside (
cytokinin
) levelSlide36
Roots left after 28-d dry downSlide37
Ascophyllum nodosum extracts
testedAcadian Seaplants (Dartmouth, Nova Scotia)ASL liquid concentrate: KOH extracted, 14.4% solids
Applied to foliage at 3.5 mg ZR/L = 28 mL SWE/L = 10 µmol ZR = 1.3 lb solids/acre =
3.3
oz
/M
Ocean Organics (Waldoboro, Maine)
Liquid concentrate:
KOH extracted, 8% solids
Applied to foliage at 3.5 mg ZR/L = 28.2 mL SWE/L
= 10 µ
mol
ZR
=
0.75
lb
solids/acre =
3.3
oz
/M
Zhang and Ervin, 2008.
Crop Sci. 48(1):364-370.Slide38
Procedures
L-93 creeping bentgrass grown from seed to maturity in conetainers in a 75/68 F greenhouse.1st SWE treatment foliar-applied 7 d prior to moving to 95/77 F growth chamber
Conetainers suspended in ¼-strength Hoagland’s solution (aerated and changed weekly)2nd SWE treatment applied 14 d after heat stress beganWhole conetainer subsamples were taken destructively every 7 days (for 49 days) to quantify responses over timeSlide39
2
nd
app
NS
b
a
a
a
ab
b
a
a
b
b
b
b
b
a
a
Bars with the same letter are not diff at P=0.05Slide40
NS
NS
a
b
a
ab
b
b
Bars with the same letter are not diff at P=0.05
b
b
b
abSlide41
End of 2006 trial, 49 days of heat stress
Check Aca SWE OO SWE CK-check ashed-SWESlide42
Bentgrass Heat Stress Study:
We investigated 5 rates of SWE against 5 equivalent rates of pure cytokinin (zeatin riboside, ZR) against 1 True Foliar program at 95-100 F day/ 77-82 F night and 70-80% RHTreatments (4 apps @ 2
wk frequency)1: Fert Control = 0.05 lb N/M solution of 20-20-202-6: SWE at 0.1 1, 10, 100, 200 uM ZR (or 0.028, 0.28, 2.8, 28, and 56% solutions)
7-11: Pure ZR at 0.1, 1, 10, 100, 1000
uM
ZR
Treatments 2-11 also mixed with 0.05
lb
N/M 20-20-20
12: CPR (3
oz
) + True Foliar K (1
oz
), T-F NK (4
oz
) + T-F Ca (1
oz
) =
same SWE and
fert
inputs as 2-4
Slide43Slide44
RESULTS (Zhang and Ervin. 2010. Crop Sci. 50:316-320)
The 2.8% (10 uM=3.5 ppm CK) SWE and ZR solutions worked better than the weaker ones but the same as the 28% solutionsThe 200 and 1000 uM solutions caused phytotoxicity
The True Foliar program mix (= 2.1% SWE solution) worked the best Slide45
Photochemical EfficiencySlide46
8 weeks at 95 F day/77 F night, treated every 2
wk
with 0.05
lb
N + SWE or CK
Fert Control 10 uM ZR 10 uM ZR from SWE True Foliar mixSlide47
Effects of Commercial Products Containing
Bacillus
spp
.
plus
Biostimulants
on an
Agrostis
stolonifera
Putting Green
Erik Ervin* and X. Zhang, Virginia Tech
M. Accorsi, D.
DiGioa
, G.
Dinelli
, University of Bologna
Sponsored by Lebanon Turf Products, USASlide48
Background, Turf Biostimulants
A 3-0-20 liquid fertilizer, with micronutrients, plus
22 million
cfu
/g of
Bacillus
spp.
Humic
acid, 3%
Seaweed extract, 4.1%
7.2%
maltodextrinSlide49
Background, Turf Biostimulants
Contains no
humate
, seaweed extract, or
maltodextrinSlide50
Background, Turf Biostimulants
Contains humate as fulvic acid, seaweed extract, but NO
maltodextrin or BacillusSlide51
Bacillus as a Plant Growth Promoting
RhizobacteriaNo direct turfgrass research found, but many reports for other crops that Bacillus produce auxin and cytokinins in the rhizosphere and increase plant fitness
Our objective was to compare Bacillus turf fertility products, containing seaweed extract + humate or not, for improved summer putting green healthSlide52
5 treatments, 4 Reps, RCBD, Spray applications (400 L/ha) every 14 d, 4 total over 60 d trial (June-July); Primarily ‘Penncross’ creeping bent/ Poa on USGA sand; N equalized at 0.1 lb/M/14d
Fert
control
Fert
control + MD
Complete
Bacillus-only
SWE+FA
Temperature was normal: 80 F/60 F
2x normal rainfall: 8 inches
Fungicides applied:
chlorothalonil
(3x);
trifloxystrobin
(1x)Slide53Slide54
At trial end, Photosynthesis increased due to Complete and Bacteria-onlySlide55
Summary and Conclusions
Small, but significant, increases in summer putting green health (rooting, PS, NDVI) were measured due to SWE+humate and Complete treatmentsNo consistent correlation to Bacillus products, though 3 Bacillus species found in rhizosphere at trial endMust recruit microbiologists into more turf research for progress to be made:
$Slide56
4. Amino AcidsSlide57
20 essential amino acids
Nitrogen is stored and transported in amino formsProteins are chains of 100’s of amino acids, usually containing all 20 in their chains Slide58
What about foliar amino acid effects?
Why might a benefit be expected?They most likely can be absorbed by leaves = smaller than sucroseThey may conserve carbohydrate during summer stress as carbohydrates are broken down in respiration to produce chemical energy (ATP and NADPH) to make amino acids…then proteins Good candidates for formulations?
Glutamine: initial product in AA production cycle; its level controls need for more or less N-assimilationTryptophan: auxin precursor = root initiationProline
:
primary
osmoregulator
for drought protectionSlide59
What are the barriers to nutrient absorption through the leaves ?
Primary ports of nutrient entry are:Stomates (20,000/cm2
leaf) Tiny pores in cuticular wax (10 billion/cm2 leaf)
Nutrient absorption occurs by:
Diffusion
Active transportSlide60
Absorption is at its peak when stomates are fully open
Factors such as salinity, heat, and water stress will cause stomates to close
Stomate openings are about 10 µm wide
Cuticle pores are 1 nm or less = 1000 times smaller than stomate openings, but there are 10
6
more
Urea (COH
4
N
2
) is 0.44 nm in size; small enough to move through culticle pores
Slide61
Sizes of molecules to go through pores
Sucrose = 1 nm, mol. wt. = 342Glucose = 0.6 nmVarious inorganic ions 0.5 to 1 nm in their hydrated formsAmino acids have mol. wt. of 75 to 204; they should pass through cuticular pores Slide62
Bentgrass foliar uptake of N sources
Stiegler
& Richardson,
UArk
, 2008Slide63
Amino acid dosing trial
L93 bentgrass with complete nutrient solution: 0.25 lb N/M/month75 F on mist bench, 3 month trialTryptophan (3 mM/month)
Glutamine (3 mM/month)ControlGlutamine: initial product in AA production cycle; its level controls need for more or less N-assimilation = less root energy needed for nitrate uptake
Tryptophan:
auxin
precursor = root initiationSlide64
Results: Leaf ColorSlide65
Photochemical EfficiencySlide66
Leaf Protein content (mg/g FW)Slide67
Testing of glutamate-based foliar fertilizer product, end of drought stress responses
Treatment
ColorChl
Shoot wt
Root wt
Tillers
SOD
Exp1,
Glu
7.1 a
3.8 a
820 a
1.32 a
6.7 a
133 a
AS
6.0 b
3.3 b
923 a
1.08 a
6.1 a
128 a
No N check
3.5 c
1.6 c
428 b
1.06 a
3.8 b
120 b
Exp1,
Glu
and AS (Ammonium-sulfate) were applied to provide 0.06 lb N/M every 10 days for 50 days. L93 creeping
bentgrass
grown in USGA sand in pots, re-watered to 12% soil moisture every 2 days to maintain continuous moderate drought stress.
Sponsor: Ajinomoto USA, AmesSlide68
Salt stress: Aquaplex, 4 WAT
Watered twice weekly with 16
dS
/m salt-water; bent tolerance 3-6
dS
/m in soil
Aquaplex
applied at 4.5
oz
/M/14 d;
it is a mix of 16 amino acids and CaNO3
ACA 2786 + salt salt-alone water-control
=Aquaplex amino
Aquatrols
-sponsoredSlide69
Salt stress: Aquaplex, 8 WAT
ACA 2786 + salt salt-alone water-control
=Aquaplex amino
Watered twice weekly with 16 dS/m salt-water; bent tolerance 3-6 dS/m in soil
Aquaplex amino applied at 4.5 oz/M/14 d
Aquatrols
-sponsoredSlide70
Questions and Discussion