/
Communicating Communicating

Communicating - PowerPoint Presentation

jane-oiler
jane-oiler . @jane-oiler
Follow
407 views
Uploaded On 2017-05-25

Communicating - PPT Presentation

Uncertainty Karen Akerlof PhD Research Assistant Professor Center for Climate Change Communication George Mason University What are the social science fields that study decisionmaking under conditions of uncertainty ID: 551993

uncertainty communication amp risk communication uncertainty risk amp decision climate science social scientific trust change communicating people public heuristics

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Communicating" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Communicating Uncertainty

Karen

Akerlof

, PhD

Research Assistant Professor

Center for Climate Change Communication

George Mason UniversitySlide2

What are the social science fields that study decision-making under conditions of uncertainty?

Decision sciences

Risk perception

Human dimensionsCommunication (science communication, health communication)Public policy

Most of these social

scientists are p

sychologists, or are in fields that use

psychological theoriesSlide3

RiskRisk equals probability times

magnitude

Risk

is a situation or event where something of human value (including humans themselves) has been put at stake and where the outcome is uncertainRisk equals hazard times outragetechnical

e

motional,

v

alue-based

The field of risk perception (psychometrics) has been driven by the question of

why technical experts and non-experts v

iew risks so

differentlySlide4

Paul Slovic

Decision Research

University of Oregon

Baruch FischhoffCarnegie MellonDaniel Kahneman

PrincetonSlide5

Van der Linden, S. (2015). The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model.

Journal of Environmental Psychology

,

41, 112–124. These fields are heavily quantitative: modeling; experimental researchSlide6

Social science frequently follows government priorities: nanotechnology, disaster recovery (Hurricane Sandy), climate change

… fisheries?Slide7

GoalTo communicate

the information that people need to make

choices.

* Social science can be used to inform decisions about WHAT to communicate and HOW to communicate it.Slide8

People Can View Physical Reality Very DifferentlySlide9

Factors that influence communication about uncertainty

1) Social context (trust; values; what is at “risk”?)

2)

Type of decision being informed (what types of technical information about uncertainty are needed)3) “Curse” of expert knowledge4) Heuristics and biases (that we all have)Slide10

Social context

1) Risk is socially constructed by

different groups.

Facilitate stakeholder self-identification with the decision-making group.2) Trust highly influences how people process risk. Instead of asking for trust, demonstrate accountability: transparency, external oversight, audits, advisory panels, contractual agreements. Slide11

Type of decision:

1) Which option is best?

Portray varied

sources of uncertainty—not just variability in data but biases from judgement, assumptions, and methodological practices. Develop protocols for reporting these sources. h

ow good are the predictions of outcomes?Slide12

Fischhoff, B., & Davis, A. L. (2014). Communicating scientific uncertainty. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,

111

(Supplement 4), 13664–13671.

Slide13

Type of decision:

2) What options are possible?

Decision makers need to understand scientific processes, and related uncertainties, in order to consider their options.

Lay and expert mental models of scientific processes frequently differ. Identify problem areas and shape communication accordingly. h

ow well known are the scientific processes shaping outcomes?Slide14

Curse of expert knowledge

1)

Lay interpretations of scientific terms may differ from experts.

Use terms that are less likely to be confused. Instead of uncertainty use “range”; instead of error use “difference from the estimate.”2) Members of the public may not have pre-existing cognitive frameworks that allow them to easily understand highly technical information. Use analogies, visualizations, diagrams, summaries of most important points.Slide15

Heuristics and biases (that we all have)

People use

“heuristics” to make decisions quickly and

easily. Heuristics like “availability,” the examples we can easily recall, can strongly influence subsequent choices. If intuitions based on lay theories are wrong, recognize the reasonableness of the intuition, provide examples that are inconsistent with that view, and then explain the scientific evidence.Slide16

People Can View Physical Reality Very Differently

But if we understand why,

w

e may be able to move closer to agreement.Slide17

Citations:TrustAkerlof, K., Rowan, K. E., Fitzgerald, D., & Cedeno

, A. Y. (2012). Communication of climate projections in US media amid politicization of model science.

Nature Climate Change, 2

(9), 648–654. Priest, S. H., Bonfadelli, H., & Rusanen, M. (2003). The “Trust Gap” Hypothesis: Predicting Support for Biotechnology Across National Cultures as a Function of Trust in Actors. Risk Analysis, 23(4), 751–766. Sandman, P. M. (1993). Responding to Community Outrage: Strategies for Effective Risk Communication. AIHA.

Slide18

Communicating uncertainty for decision-makingFischhoff, B., & Davis, A. L. (2014). Communicating scientific uncertainty.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

,

111(Supplement 4), 13664–13671. Rowan, K. E., Botan, C. H., Kreps, G. L., Samoilenko, S., & Farnsworth, K. (2009). Risk communication education for local emergency managers: Using the CAUSE model for research, education, and outreach. Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication, 168–191. Sterman, J. D. (2008). Risk communication on climate: mental models and mass balance. Science, 322

(5901), 532–533.

Slide19

Communication barriersBudescu, D. V., Broomell, S., &

Por

, H.-H. (2009). Improving Communication of Uncertainty in the Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Psychological Science, 20(3), 299–308. Morss, R. E., Demuth, J. L., & Lazo, J. K. (2008). Communicating Uncertainty in Weather Forecasts: A Survey of the U.S. Public. Weather and Forecasting, 23(5), 974–991. Somerville, R. C. J., & Hassol, S. J. (2011). Communicating the science of climate change. Physics Today, 64(10), 48–53.

Slide20

Contact:kakerlof@gmu.edu703 993 6667