PPT-Errors in Reasoning:

Revisiting the Toulmin Model and its Greek Predecessors The Core Concepts To detect errors in argumentation Ask probing questions that politely but relentlessly demand Logical Consistency. P(. A . &. B. ) . = . P(. A. |. B. ) * P(. B. ). Product Rule:. Bayesian Reasoning. P(. A . &. B. ) . = . P(. A. |. B. ) * P(. B. ). Product Rule:. Shorthand for . . P(A=true & B=true) = P(A=true | B=true) * P(B=true). Patricia A. Alexander. Forward a claim about the association between relational reasoning with metacognition theory and research. Consider the nature of percepts and concepts in human learning and performance. Argument. Monty Python – Argument Clinic video. Monty Python. Premises + Conclusion = Argument. Argument – a group of statements including one or more premises and a conclusion. Premise – a statement in an argument that provides reason or support for the conclusion. It’s Logical. What is Logic?. Logic. – The science of correct reasoning.. Reasoning. . – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from known or assumed facts. .. There are two main types of reasoning:. subtyping. 14. th. international conference on Modularity. 1. Mehdi Bagherzadeh. Robert . Dyer. Rex D. Fernando. Jose . Sanchez. Hridesh Rajan. Event types: . separation of crosscutting concerns. a subject announces an event (using . Sub; legal method and legal reasoning. NITIN RANA. PARIKSHIT GAUR. PURNENDU . PuLKITPAL. . SINGH. RISHAB RAJ. RITIKA GAUTAM. Group MEMBERS ARE -. Deductive reasoning is sometimes referred to as top-down logic. Its counterpart, inductive reasoning, is sometimes referred to as bottom-up logic. Where deductive reasoning proceeds from general premises to a specific conclusion, inductive reasoning proceeds from specific premises to a general conclusion. . After Four years of CER . in the . Classroom. Laura Rossier. F. A. Day Middle School. 8. th. grade Earth & Space Science. laura_rossier@newton.k12.ma.us. What’s your CER experience?. How many have never heard of CER?. Development Part III. Kohlberg’s theory of moral development. Criticisms of Kohlberg’s theory. Recent contributions of social psychology and neuroscience to understanding moral judgment. Baby morality. Task Force. Final Report. 15 September . 2016. Guiding Principle: . Educational Policy must balance access and opportunity to achieve equity.. Recommendation I. Define quantitative reasoning. Recommendation I. Mike Cooper. 29/01/16. Starter activity. Which number does not belong?. 15. 23. 20. 25. (Harder?) Starter activity. If 0.3 x 0.5 = 0.15. is 0.3 x 0.2 = 0.6. ?. Why reason?. When is reasoning needed?. A professional development program to help teachers better understand the mathematical reasoning needed for ratio, proportion, and proportional reasoning.. To understand the importance and significance of ratio, proportion, and proportional reasoning in the middle grades mathematics curriculum.. Qualitative Preferences: Tools and Applications. Ganesh Ram Santhanam. 1. , . Samik. Basu. 1. & . Vasant. Honavar. 2. 1. Iowa . State . University, . 2 . Penn State University. gsanthan@iastate.edu. Pavle. . Valerjev. Department of psychology. University of . Zadar. Thinking. Psychology of thinking. Reasoning. Problem solving. Judgment and decision making. Undirected thinking (Gilhooly, 1996). Cognitive approach: Thinking as . - Charles Sanders Peirce. On the Radar. Researching the Persuasive Speech Assignment. Due Wednesday on . WebCT. (by 11:59 p.m.). Exam Two. This Friday in Lecture. Study Guide on Course Website. Workshops for the Persuasive Speech.