Population and Migration Unit Thomas Malthus Ester Boserup Malthus Malthus believed that there was a finite optimum population in relation to food supply and that an increase beyond that point would lead to a decline in living standards and to war famine and disease ID: 651203
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Malthus and Boserup AP Human Geography" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Malthus and Boserup
AP Human GeographyPopulation and Migration Unit
Thomas Malthus
Ester
BoserupSlide2
Malthus
Malthus believed that there was a finite optimum population in relation to food supply and that an increase beyond that point would lead to a decline in living standards and to war, famine and disease
.An increase in the population above the optimum limit would therefore lead to war, famine and disease
.Slide3
A PESSIMISTIC approach
Thomas Malthus (1798) proposed his work during the early stages of the industrial revolution
when inadequate food and clothing were common features in England.His argument was that population increases (geometrically) or at an exponential rate if unchecked i.e. 1-2-4-8-16-32 etcFood supply at best increases at an arithmetic rate i.e.1-2-3-4-5-6 etcSlide4
Thomas Malthus (aka Tommy Malt)
Population Growth
Food
Growth
Today1 person1 unitT + 252 persons
2 units
T + 50
4 persons
3 units
T + 75
8 persons
4 unitsT + 10016 persons5 units
English economist
Essay on the Principle
of Population
, 1798
Population
Geometric/Exponential
growth
Food supply
Arithmetic growthSlide5
A PESSIMISTIC approach
Malthus suggested that a rise in population, however small, would mean that eventually population growth exceeded increases in food supply and that yields from a given field could not go on increasing forever and that the land available is finite.
He believed the population-resource balance was maintained by various ‘checks’:Slide6
Negative
(preventative) checks are methods of limiting population growth
: e.g. celibacy, delaying marriage which lower fertility rates
He noted that there was a correlation between wheat prices and marriage rates i.e. wheat price increases marriage rates decrease (C18th)
Positive checks (decrease in population size due to): famine, war, diseases i.e. anything which increases mortality and decreases life expectancy.Carrying capacities can relate to ecosystems and humans.Rapid economic growth can impede economic development by exacerbating social and economic problems.
A
PESSIMISTIC
approachSlide7
Malthus on population:
“Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits. In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague. In the country we should build our villages near stagnant pools, and particularly encourage settlements in all marshy and unwholesome situations. But above all, we should reprobate specific remedies for ravaging diseases: and those benevolent, but much mistaken men, who have thought they were doing a service to mankind by projecting schemes for the total extirpation of particular disorders. If by these and similar means the annual mortality were increased ... we might probably every one of us marry at the age of puberty and yet few be absolutely starved.”Slide8
How was Malthus right?
Population has been rising quicklyLimited use of contraceptives (DTM stages 2 and early 3)
Population has outgrown food Farm land to urban land, environmental degradation, life-supporting crops to cash crops, climate changes decrease food production
Neo-MalthusiansSupporters of Malthusian theory today. Concern today is not just food but air, energy, water, and space.Slide9
How was Malthus wrong?
Population hasn’t grown exponentiallyExpanded use of contraceptives
Demographic Transition Model stages 4 and 5Political, economic, cultural decisions that limit growthFood supply grew faster than predicted
New technologies made farmers far more efficient (mechanization, chemicals, irrigation, etc.)Green Revolution (genetically modified, improved seedsFood preservation and distribution
Highways, refrigeration, containerization Slide10
An OPTIMISTIC approach
Ester Boserup
(1965) suggested that an increase in population would stimulate technologists to increase food production.It followed that a rise in population will increase demand for food and therefore act as an incentive to modify technology to produce more food. In other words,
“Necessity is the mother of invention”.As population increases agriculture moves into higher stages of intensity with new methods.Slide11
An OPTIMISTIC approach
Followers of Boserup argue that food production is much more optimistic
than that of a Malthusian, as she claims that food supplies will stay ahead of population growth.Innovations such as the ‘Green Revolution’ introduced high-yield seeds to LDCs who witnessed increased yields from these processes allowing more people to be fed.Slide12
Limitations of Boserups theory
Based on closed communities, which apart from the globe, is not the case as migration occurs.Therefore difficult to test these ideas as migration occurs in areas of over-population to relieve population pressure, which according to
Boserups’s theory leads to technological innovation.Also Over-population can lead to unsustainable farming practices which may degrade the land e.g. desertification in the Sahel.