PPT-Thinking like a Policy Debater
Author : kittie-lecroy | Published Date : 2016-03-15
Casey Parsons How arguments interact Debaters think in a paradigm of weighing offense versus defense Offensive arguments are arguments that have impacts attached
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Thinking like a Policy Debater" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Thinking like a Policy Debater: Transcript
Casey Parsons How arguments interact Debaters think in a paradigm of weighing offense versus defense Offensive arguments are arguments that have impacts attached to them theyre the most important to the round. Debaters are not only required to read a lot of material an impossible amount really they are also required to remember what theyve read and to call on what theyve learned for the purpose of research and in the impromptu debate prep room I hope that Computational thinking. How to use this resource. Presenting these exercises as a PowerPoint presentation allows you to use the resource in a variety of ways:. Projecting the exercise from the front of the class as a starter/plenary activity.. September . 11, 2014. . 1. Today’s Agenda. Critical Thinking Assignment. Historical Overview. NDP Years. Campbell Years. September . 11, 2014. . 2. Critical Thinking assignment. Daniel . Kahan. , “. APPROACHES TO TEACHING THINKING thinking skills into content area lessons. Lessonsimprove student thinking and enhance content learning.Restructuringcontent lessons fordirect instructionin thinkingUse Computational thinking. How to use this resource. Presenting these exercises as a PowerPoint presentation allows you to use the resource in a variety of ways:. Projecting the exercise from the front of the class as a starter/plenary activity.. Finding Arguments . in a Debate. March 11, 2014, UWINDSOR. D. Walton and T. F. Gordon. CRRAR . Introduction. This . paper conducts a tour of two recently developed AI systems for argument invention, shows how they work, and explains how they can be applied to assist argumentation. . of Information. . China Debate Education . Network. Definition of Points of Information. During their opponents’ speeches debaters may get the opportunity to raise a . point. The opportunity to raise a point occurs only with the permission of the opponent who is speaking. Orientation. Volunteers Make it Happen!. 2. We can’t do this without you.. You are making an investment.. You are performing a teaching role in the . . lives of our students.. You make it possible for young people to. Pune International Centre. The bystander sees things neither the actor nor the audience notices. Above all, he sees differently from the way actors or audiences see. Bystanders reflect — and reflection is a prism rather than a mirror; it refracts.. When we attempt practical thinking, there are three functional difficulties:. Emotions (not think/react). Helplessness (inadequacy). Confusion (juggle too much). We do too much!. Six colors, six hats. EKU will. . graduate . informed, critical and creative thinkers who can communicate effectively. .. https://sites.google.com/site/qepcafe/. http://qep.eku.edu/. 1. Scenario. Group activity . . (2-4 participants, approx. 10 minutes). Dr. Kenneth Jones. Pastor, Practical Living Ministry. Review. Are your thoughts taking you captive instead of you taking captive of your thoughts?. Deliverance requires. Choice. – A decision of the will and heart. Marsha Spence, PhD, MPH, RDN, LDN. Department of Nutrition. The University of Tennessee, Knoxville. What Is Critical Thinking?. The process of actively and skillfully. conceptualizing, . applying, . analyzing, . .. Mike Kelly, Natasha Kriznik, Ann Louise Kinmonth, Tom Ling. Primary Care Unit. Institute of Public Health. University of Cambridge; and. RAND Cambridge. Policy documents about health inequalities 1976-2010..
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Thinking like a Policy Debater"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents