PPT-Ecological Risk Assessment Data Quality Considerations

Thomas Steeger Environmental Fate and Effects Division EPA Office of Pesticide Programs 1 US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention OCSPP Mission. Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2. EPA’s Cleanup Process. Data. Collection. From:. -Site Discovery. -Preliminary Assessment. -Site Inspection. Source:. -Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund - Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual. Part A, EPA/540/1-89/002. . Association . of Corporate Counsel. © 2015. 1. Our . questions…. 2. "What should my company do to prepare for a data-related . incident?". "What can I do to . help manage risks while supporting innovation?”. a Balanced Assessment Framework. . . Please follow along: . https://goo.gl/8Uj9qs. . 1. Lynne Bland . Chesterfield County Public Schools. Jennifer Brown. Overview. 2. Objective: Define minimum requirements for quality control of TMF content. Goals: Produce a document that can be used throughout the industry to define TMF Quality. Timeline Q3/Q4 2016. As a group, we agreed:. Peer Review. Frank Ricciardi, PE, LSP. Weston & Sampson. W&S Scope of Work. Evaluate the status of remediation and risk assessment activities . Advise if remediation is in compliance with all applicable state laws;. Stephen Head | Director | Experis Finance . Agenda. Threats and Root Causes of Breaches. Financial risk / loss. Business interruption. Reputational / brand risk. Regulatory risk / requirements. Liability of Board / Management. Dr. Shane Parson, PE, CFM, URS (RAMPP Team). 2011 ASFPM Annual National Conference. Louisville, KY. Agenda. Overview. Average Annualized Loss (AAL Study). Risk MAP – Flood Risk Assessment Dataset. Panel Member Induction. Session Objectives. Role of the Assessment Quality Panel. The AQP process. Accessing the collected data via the BI tool. Interpreting the data. School response/reflection/plan. Update on Risk Table for 2019 Assessment Cycle Martin Dorn and Stephani Zador AFSC Sept 18, 2019 Observer Training Room 1055, AFSC Risk Table Approach – documenting relevant information/concerns that are not addressed within the assessment model Quality of MIP indicators: Assessment of data and metadata ESTP Course Luxembourg 9-11 December 2014 Ivana Jablonska & Julien Bollati , MIP TF Outline Quality framework of MIP Indicators Work Chapter 11— Skin, Hair, and Nails Assessment Integumentary System Includes: skin, hair, nails, sweat glands Provides vital information about patient’s health status Offers systemic data regarding Hümeyra BAHÇECİ (. Expert. ). Turkish. . Ministry. of . Forestry. . and. . Water. . Affairs. . Directorate. General . for. . Water. Management . hbahceci@ormansu.gov.tr. . A . Research on Biological Indices for Ecological Assessment of Water Bodies in Turkey. Data Program Self-Assessment. A. methodology, guide and tools . to help agencies answer four . key questions:. Do we have the right data to make good decisions and meet reporting requirements? . WISE Workshop. Data Protection Impact Assessment . KIT. Risk . – . “scenario . describing an event and its consequences, estimated in terms of severity . and likelihood”. Risk management – “coordinated .