/
2 n  Factorial Experiment 2 n  Factorial Experiment

2 n Factorial Experiment - PowerPoint Presentation

liane-varnes
liane-varnes . @liane-varnes
Follow
346 views
Uploaded On 2019-06-21

2 n Factorial Experiment - PPT Presentation

4 Factor used to Remove Chemical Oxygen demand from Distillery Spent Wash RK Prasad and SN Srivastava 2009 Electrochemical degradation of distillery spent wash using catalytic anode Factorial ID: 759607

effect effects main row effects effect row main interactions factor column error table levels contrasts interaction wash spent distillery significant create chemical

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "2 n Factorial Experiment" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

2n Factorial Experiment

4 Factor used to Remove Chemical Oxygen demand from Distillery Spent Wash

R.K. Prasad and S.N. Srivastava (2009). “

Electrochemical degradation of distillery spent

wash using

catalytic

anode: Factorial

design of

experiments,”

Chemical Engineering Journal

, Vol. 146, pp. 22-29.

Slide2

Data Description

Response: Y = % Chemical Oxygen Demand Removed from Distillery Spent wash

Factors and Levels:

A: Current Density (mA/cm

2

) – 14.285, 42.857

B: Dilution (%) – 10, 30

C: Time (

hrs

) – 2, 5

D: pH – 4, 9

Experimental Runs: 16 – All 2

4

Combinations of levels of A,B,C,D

Slide3

Data – Normal Order

For the Label, any factor at its high level appears in lower case form.

(1) Corresponds to the case when all factors are at their low levels.

Slide4

Table of Contrasts - I

Create a Column for the intercept (I), one for each Main Effect and each Interaction (A,…,D, AB,…,CD, ABC,…,BCD, ABCD), and one for the response (y). If there were multiple replicates per treatment, replace y with the mean of those

r

replicates

Create a row for each experimental run (treatment), using the Labels from the previous slide.

For the Intercept Column, put +1 in each row

For all Main Effects, Put +1 if that factor was at its high level, -1 if at its low level (Note: Books use +/-)

Slide5

Table of Contrasts - II

For Interactions, multiply the coefficients in each row for the Main Effects that make up that Interaction.

For Row 1 and Column AB: A has coefficient -1, B has -1, so AB has (-1)(-1) = +1

For Row 1 and Column ABC: (-1)(-1)(-1) = -1

For Row 1 and Column ABCD: (-1)(-1)(-1)(-1) = +1

An Interaction will have a coefficient of +1 if it has an even number of its Main Effects at their low levels, -1 if an odd number.

Slide6

Table of Contrasts - III

Create 4 Rows below this “matrix”: Contrast, Divisor, Effect, Sum of Squares

Slide7

Table of Contrasts - IV

Slide8

Analysis of Variance

Notes: Factor D (pH) has by far the largest effect on the outcome.

With all mean effects and interactions, there are no error degrees of freedom, and no tests can be conducted

Consider dropping interactions with small sums of squares to obtain an error term (Authors dropped: AB, AC, BC, and BCD)

Slide9

Regression Approach

Slide10

Further Model Reduction (Simplification)

When testing the effects after removing the Interactions with the smallest effects, we find BD, ACD, and ABCD all have P-values that are > 0.10. Now we remove them for a simpler model.

Slide11

Normal Probability Plot of Factor & Interaction Effects

Under hypothesis of no main effects or interactions, estimated effects should be approximately normally distributed with mean 0. Construct a normal probability plot of estimated effects

Clearly, several effects fall well away from central line

Slide12

A Simple Test for Effects & Interactions

Method described by Lenth (1989):Obtain s0 = 1.5*median(|Effects|)Compute: pseudo standard error: PSE = median(|Effects|*Indicator(|Effect| < 2.5*s0))Compute Simultaneous Margin of Error: SME = t(.05/(2*Cm),d)*PSE where m = # of Effects, Cm=m(m-1)/2, d=m/3Consider effect significant if |Effect| > SME

Based on this criteria, only pH main effect is significant. When not making adjustment for multiple tests (ME), 3 effects are significant or very close

Slide13