Coerced Labor Historical examples of Slavery Ancient GrecoRoman World Southeast Asia Muslim World Black Sea Trade Network SubSaharan Africa Common Features Status for slave holder Outward sign of social inequality ID: 241593
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "1450 -1750" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
1450 -1750
Coerced LaborSlide2
Historical examples of Slavery
Ancient Greco-Roman World
Southeast Asia
Muslim World
Black Sea Trade Network
Sub-Saharan AfricaSlide3
Common Features
Status for slave holder
Outward sign of social inequality
Most often productive capacity – agricultural servitude, some cases domestic servitudeAs a result of debt or prisoners of war – overtime tradition (degree of permanence varied)Trade networks made slaves a profitable commodity
Gender roles and ratios a reflection of slavery’s purpose Slide4
Non-Slave Coerced Labor
Serfdom
Corvee
American
Mit’a
SystemSlide5
Common Features
Reciprocal in Nature
Based on cultural tradition, precedence and political order
Like slavery, outward sign of social inequalities & productive capacity,
butSlide6
BASELINE @ 1450
Slave / non-slave
Productive capacity – Labor , hard work
Valuable for productivity
Valuable as commodity
Social inequality
Motive: need/purpose
Locally developed &orchestratedSlide7
HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENTS AFTER 1450
THAT PROVIDE HISTORICAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE CHANGES TO COERCIVE LABOR…
Big Ideas
….Global trade network
Transatlantic exchange – west coast of Africa
Plantation Complex Economy – mines/monoculture
More Specific…Portugal – around Africa Sugar Plantations (Cyprus, Atlantic Islands, Americas)Great Dying of AmerindiansRole of Interior AfricaSlide8
COERCED LABOR 1750
Still a sign of status, outward social inequality and economic production…
Race as dominating factor
Plantation Complex predominant form for enslavement
Profits from Trade as significant as monoculture product
Global Institutionalized NetworkSlide9
Philip Curtain
Using Statistics to develop historical understanding:
The Atlantic Slave Trade: A Census
Slide10
Est. Slave Imports to the new WorldSlide11Slide12Slide13
Slavery: A Comparative Perspective
North America
natural reproduction
equal
sex ratio, a high birthrate, and a predominantly American-born population.only about 1/3rd of the population was enslaved
Direct control by landowners and managersGreater disparity in slave ownership (1000s– 1)Two-category system of race
Latin AmericaDeath rate 1/3rd higherlower
proportion of female slaves, a much lower birthrate, and a higher proportion of recent arrivals from Africa
80 to 90
%of
the
population
Absentee landowners utilized free black
managers
and mulattos
as
intermediaries
intricate system of racial classification
emerged
more tolerant of racial mixingSlide14Slide15
Curtain’s African Slave trade
Impact on Africa and Role of Africans
Distribution of Slave Populations in the Americas
Role of Sugar Plantation ComplexSlide16
Philip Curtain,
Rise and Fall of the Plantation Complex
The feudal class was a military class not a group of agricultural estate managers. Agricultural production above the family level was organized through the village, but no one managed village agriculture in detail. Villagers, whether serf or free, worked the soil according to a system embedded in tradition and sanctioned by custom that had the force of law.
The lord of the manor was around somewhere, and normally had certain rights to the labor of the villagers and to the product of the land. He also held rights to a set of customary payments. But these rights were always limited, and they did not include the right to organize agricultural production as he saw fit…..
The point here is that the lord of the manor did not own the land. He was not free to use the land as he saw fit. All he owned was a set of customary rights.Slide17
Discuss the change and continuity of plantation agriculture in
Latin
America between the
mid 1400s to 1750.
Baseline: No integration of Hemispheres
large-scale agriculture among the Aztecs and Incasmajority of people are
peasants mit'a system in Inca; tribute empireSlide18
Global Context: Think Big!
Rise
of the
West
ReconquistaProtestant Reformationspread of ChristianityEuropean competition for control of global trade (Portuguese trading empire
)Mercantilism / capitalism Treaty of Tordesillas
Columbian exchangeSlide19
Latin America…
Fall of empires to
Spanish
superior weapons/horses; dissatisfaction of groups
decimation of population; some flee to rural areas to maintain traditional farming methods
initial focus on mining, encomienda system (and Christianity)Batolome
de las Casas (Tears of the Indians); Black Legend concern
by monarch about power of
landholders-
New Laws
of the Indies
difficult
to enforce; revolt by some
encomenderos
plantation
monoculture; cash crops--sugar (rum and molasses) ; export economy; triangular trade
; African
Slaves
miscegenation-
-dominated by people of European descent/some elevation to mestizo/mulatto
class
alternative
systems-
repartimiento
/
mit’a system; peonage system (haciendas)Slide20
Plantation Economy
Large capital investment
Extensive labor force-Slave
labor
Encomienda
– Native American population too low
African Slave LaborIntensive labor at multiple levels of production– harvest, sugar mill, molasses
Monoculture export
Capitalist
enterprise – Profits to produce capital
Consider again Curtain’s Plantation segmentSlide21
End Point
large-scale
plantation agriculture (sugar
) social hierarchy based on race
exploitation of AmerindiansAfrican race-based Slavery
coercive labor still in placebeginning to question validity of the
system of slaverySlide22
Thesis…
Significant changes occurred in Latin
America between 1450 and 1750. The age
of discovery ushered in an era of European
domination that resulted in the destruction
of existing Amerindian civilizations and
dramatic transformations in the economic
landscape.
While agriculture continued to
play an important role for a majority of the population who often toiled for the benefit of others, monoculture plantations worked by exploited indigenous people along with imported slaves became the norm
.