/
Total School Cluster Grouping & Differentiation Total School Cluster Grouping & Differentiation

Total School Cluster Grouping & Differentiation - PowerPoint Presentation

lindy-dunigan
lindy-dunigan . @lindy-dunigan
Follow
444 views
Uploaded On 2017-10-10

Total School Cluster Grouping & Differentiation - PPT Presentation

By April Payne Goals of Total School Cluster Grouping TSCG Provide fulltime services to highachieving elementary students Help all students improve their academic achievement and educational selfefficacy ID: 594563

grouping students ability high students grouping high ability cluster gentry achieving achievement teachers gifted differentiation tscg place average student classroom school implementation

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Total School Cluster Grouping & Diff..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Total School Cluster Grouping & Differentiation

By April PayneSlide2

Goals of Total School Cluster Grouping (TSCG)

Provide full-time services to high-achieving elementary students.

Help all students improve their academic achievement and educational self-efficacy.

Help teachers more effectively and efficiently meet the diverse needs of their students.

Weave gifted education and talent development “know-how” into the fabric of all education practices in the school.Improve representation of traditionally underserved students identified over time as above average and high achieving. -(Gentry, p. 3)Slide3

Non-Negotiable Components of Cluster Grouping

Groups of students (varying in number from three to more than 10) identified as gifted, high-achieving, or high-ability are placed in classrooms with students of other achievement levels.

Teachers differentiate curriculum and instruction.

Successful teachers of the high-ability students have an interest or background working with gifted students.

-(Gentry, p. 4)

NOTE:

To change images on this slide, select a picture and delete it. Then click the Insert Picture icon

in the placeholder to insert your own image.Slide4

The “How-To’s

” of TSCG

Ability grouping takes into account factors in addition to ability, sometimes factors in place of ability (Gentry, p.8).

Possibly use the HOPE Scale to guide teachers in identification of students. (p.29).

Maintain a flexible identification process where cut-off scores and matrices should not be employed (p. 31).Teachers complete Student Data Summary Cards, which identify achievement, discipline, attendance, etc. (p. 33). “Place high-achieving students in one cluster and above average in other classrooms,” (p. 32).

Do not place every level of student in each classroom, (p. 32).

Do not place low-achieving with high-achieving students (p. 32).

Each teacher should have about the same number of students at or above average (p. 32).Slide5

Fidelity Checks For Implementation

Checklist for First Two Years of Implementation

All homerooms contain students that are considered above-average.

High-achieving and above average children should not be placed in same homeroom.

Teachers are actively involved in development of class lists.Asterisks are used to designate permanent assignments.Even distribution of students with behavioral problems.Checklist for Years 3-5 of Implementation

Every teacher uses gifted education practices.

Differentiation is made easier with grouping.

Regrouping can occur among classes and grade levels.

Test scores can move students up (not down) during yearly identification.No language about low or high classes exists.

(Gentry, p. 54)Slide6

Pros and Cons of Cluster Grouping and DifferentiationSlide7

Pros of TSCG

Gifted students are given the opportunity to interact with both intellectual and age peers (Gentry, p. 14).

Without additional costs, full-time services can be provided to gifted students (p. 14).

Curricular differentiation is more likely to occur and is more efficient (p. 14).

Without highest achievers in a classroom, other achievers are able to gain recognition (p. 14).Student achievement increases with cluster grouping (p. 14).Over the long term, fewer students are identified as low achievers (p. 14)Cluster grouping reduces the range of student achievement in the classroom (p. 14).Slide8

Cons of the TSCG

Clustering is sometimes confused with tracking. This can create a negative attitude towards clustering. An important distinction is that ability or achievement grouping is “a more flexible arrangement that takes into account factors in addition to ability, and sometimes in place of ability,” (Gentry, p. 8).

Concerns from teachers. For example, “[Y]

ou

take those top kids out and I’m not going to have any spark,” (Gentry, p. 23). TSCG cannot not be fully implemented without administrator buy-in.New students coming in may have to be temporarily placed in a classroom (p. 41).Slide9

Reference

Gentry, M. (2014). Total school cluster grouping and differentiation: A comprehensive, research-based plan for raising student achievement and improving teacher practice (2nd ed.). Waco, TX:

Prufrock

Press.