PPT-Extended Sparse Linear Model for Face Recognition

Weihong Deng 邓伟洪 Beijing Univ Post amp Telecom 北京邮电大学 2 Characteristics of Face Pattern The facial shapes are too similar sometimes identical 100 face detection rate kinship verification. Yang Member IEEE Arvind Ganesh Student Member IEEE S Shankar Sastry Fellow IEEE and Yi Ma Senior Member IEEE Abstract We consider the problem of automatically recognizing human faces from frontal views with varying expression and illuminationaswel Compressive Sensing of Videos. Venue. CVPR 2012, Providence, RI, USA. June 16, 2012. Organizers. :. Richard G. . Baraniuk. Mohit. Gupta. Aswin C. Sankaranarayanan. Ashok Veeraraghavan. Part 2: Compressive sensing. :. A Literature Survey. By:. W. Zhao, R. Chellappa, P.J. Phillips,. and A. Rosenfeld. Presented By:. Diego Velasquez. Contents . Introduction. Why do we need face recognition?. Biometrics. Face Recognition by Humans. Sparse Beamforming. Volkan. . cevher. Joint work with: . baran. . gözcü. , . afsaneh. . asaei. outline. 2. Array . a. cquisition model. Spatial linear prediction. Minimum variance distortion-less response (MVDR). Recovery. . (. Using . Sparse. . Matrices). Piotr. . Indyk. MIT. Heavy Hitters. Also called frequent elements and elephants. Define. HH. p. φ. . (. x. ) = { . i. : |x. i. | ≥ . φ. ||. x||. p. . hongliang. . xue. Motivation. . Face recognition technology is widely used in our lives. . Using MATLAB. . ORL database. Database. The ORL Database of Faces. taken between April 1992 and April 1994 at the Cambridge University Computer . Linda Shapiro. CSE 455. 1. Face recognition: once you’ve detected and cropped a face, try to recognize it. Detection. Recognition. “Sally”. 2. Face recognition: overview. Typical scenario: few examples per face, identify or verify test example. Contents. Problem Statement. Motivation. Types . of . Algorithms. Sparse . Matrices. Methods to solve Sparse Matrices. Problem Statement. Problem Statement. The . solution . of . the linear system is the values of the unknown vector . Object Recognition. Murad Megjhani. MATH : 6397. 1. Agenda. Sparse Coding. Dictionary Learning. Problem Formulation (Kernel). Results and Discussions. 2. Motivation. Given a 16x16(or . nxn. ) image . Linda Shapiro. CSE 455. 1. Face recognition: once you’ve detected and cropped a face, try to recognize it. Detection. Recognition. “Sally”. 2. Face recognition: overview. Typical scenario: few examples per face, identify or verify test example. Vimal Singh, . Ahmed H. Tewfik. The University of Texas at Austin. 1. Outline. Introduction. Algorithm. Results. Conclusions. 2. Introduction. Algorithm. Results. Conclusions. Significance. Fast magnetic resonance . Hao Zhang. Computer Science Department. 1. Problem Statement. Verification. Identification. A. B. Same / Different persons?. A. B. C. D. Which has the same identity as A?. 2. Solutions. Extensions of still face recognition algorithms. Linda Shapiro. ECE P 596. 1. What’s Coming. Review of . Bakic. flesh . d. etector. Fleck and Forsyth flesh . d. etector. Review of Rowley face . d. etector. Overview of. . Viola Jones face detector with . Afsaneh . Asaei. Joint work with: . Mohammad . Golbabaee. ,. Herve. Bourlard, . Volkan. . Cevher. φ. 21. φ. 52. s. 1. s. 2. s. 3. . s. 4. s. 5. x. 1. x. 2. φ. 11. φ. 42. 2. Speech . Separation Problem.