/
Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project

Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project - PowerPoint Presentation

lois-ondreau
lois-ondreau . @lois-ondreau
Follow
480 views
Uploaded On 2016-06-01

Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project - PPT Presentation

Update Dr Richard W Smith Assistant State Veterinarian over Ruminant Programs Bovine TB Program Coordinator Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project Goal To work with approximately 1000 farms in Michigans TB zones to develop individual biosecurity plans for each farm ID: 344781

wildlife farms herds wrm farms wildlife wrm herds cattle verified program infected project risk mitigated 452 participating dmu project

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Wildlife Risk Mitigation ProjectUpdate

Dr. Richard W. SmithAssistant State Veterinarian over Ruminant ProgramsBovine TB Program CoordinatorSlide2

Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project GoalTo work with approximately 1,000 farms in Michigan’s TB zones to develop individual biosecurity plans for each farm.

Why do farms in the TB zones need a biosecurity plan?Slide3
Slide4
Slide5

Wildlife Risk Mitigation Project’s Objectives

Protect stored feed from wildlife intrusions

Provide water that has not been contaminated by wildlife intrusions

Feed cattle safely

Where cattle pasture

How & where fed feeds are fed to cattleSlide6

ResultsProject began in August 2008

2009-340 participating farms-340 farms verified2010-349 participating farms-348 farms verified2011-186 participating farms-186 farms verified2012-83 participating farms-80 farms verified

2013-69 participating farms-48 farms verified

Totals:

1,027

farms participated

1,002

farms verified (98%)Slide7

How Many Farms Are Still Unmitigated?

MAAZAntrim - 18/118 15% 1 herd with 20+ cattleCharlevoix - 14/98

14%

0 herds with 20+

Cheboygan - 39/134

29%

0 herds with 20+

Crawford - 100% mitigated

Emmet - 18/131

14%

0 herds with 20+

Otsego - 11/70

16%

0 herds with 20+

Presque Isle – 34/125

27

%

4

herds with 20+Slide8

How Many Farms Are Still Unmitigated?MAZ

Alcona - 28/89 31% 3 herds with 20+ cattleAlpena - 54/219 25%

9 herds with 20+

Montmorency - 15/88

17%

2 herds with 20+

Oscoda - 27/69

39%

2 herds with 20+Slide9

Has WRM Helped Prevent TB Infections?

Program benchmark: 2 winter inspectionsSince 2009 Three bovine TB infected farms that had been winter verified twiceAll of these farms were located in DMU 452

Two of these farms were previously infectedSlide10

Has WRM Helped Prevent TB Infections?Two farms that had entered the program for

a short while (one a few months, the other a few days), but were found infected prior to ever being winter inspected even onceSince 2009 there have been five bovine TB infected farms associated with wildlife intrusions that were not verified as Wildlife Risk MitigatedSlide11

Conclusion From Results

Farms in core area (DMU 452) may require additional attention to details of farms’ biosecurity plan.Because of increased risk of TB infected WTD grazing pastures in core area there is likely a increased risk to cattle.Research has demonstrated it takes 20-30 hours of sunlight to kill the bacteria (M. bovis

) deposited on grass in infected saliva.Slide12

WRM Project’s ResponseAs a result of finding two farms in 2012 the WRM Project field staff reached out in 2012-2013 to producers in DMU 452 to:

provide info on where TB has occurred within 5 mile radius of their farmlook for any chinks in farm’s planEmily Sewell-Alpena Conservation District Office

Wildlife Services field staff-Gaylord WS Office

About 50% of farms in DMU 452 requested a biologist to visit their farm.Slide13

WRM Project’s ResponseAsked MSU for assistance in researching:

the safety of wet wrapping hay - Dr. Grooms will present the findings this afternoon at 1:30the safety in presenting salt in areas where it can be accessed by wildlife - I will present the findings this afternoon at 1:50Slide14

WRM Project’s Response2013 survey of producers in DMU 452 regarding:

How they viewed the possibility of a State sponsored herd buyout program similar to what Texas did in the El Paso watershed

25% favorable (13/51)

H

ow they viewed a State sponsored cost-share program to fence pastures

57% favorable (36/63)Slide15

Benefits of WRM ProjectPractical - keeping cattle from being infected by bovine TB

39% (20/51) of infected farms in TB zone no longer have cattleSlide16

Benefits of WRM ProjectMAAZ

Has helped TB Program to move MAAZ counties to higher statusIf mitigated no need to do pre-movement testIf not mitigated must do pre-movement test at own expenseIf mitigated no need for cattle to have post-movement test

If not mitigated purchaser must do post-movement testSlide17

Benefits of WRM ProjectMAZ

Cost-share program (2009-2013)$1,136,952.97 provided in MDARD funded cost-share grants74 cost shared hoop barns

4 cost-shared feed storage fences

MDARD sought out Federal funding (2011)

$1,500,000

provided through NRCS’ EQIP ProgramSlide18

Questions?