/
1st level analysis: basis functions, parametric modulation 1st level analysis: basis functions, parametric modulation

1st level analysis: basis functions, parametric modulation - PowerPoint Presentation

luanne-stotts
luanne-stotts . @luanne-stotts
Follow
395 views
Uploaded On 2017-04-03

1st level analysis: basis functions, parametric modulation - PPT Presentation

regressors 1 st of February 2012 Sylvia Kreutzer MaxPhilipp Stenner Methods for Dummies 20112012 1 First Level Analysis Data analysis with SPM Preprocessing of the data Alignment smoothing etc ID: 533164

2012 2011 methods dummies 2011 2012 dummies methods functions response hrf model multicollinearity basis design parametric spm time canonical

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "1st level analysis: basis functions, par..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

1st level analysis: basis functions, parametric modulation and correlated regressors.

1st of February 2012Sylvia KreutzerMax-Philipp Stenner

Methods for Dummies 2011/2012

1Slide2

First Level AnalysisData analysis with SPM

Pre-processing of the data (Alignment, smoothing etc.)First Level Analysis

Basis Functions (Sylvia)Experimental design and correlated

regressors

(Max)Random Field theory (next talk)Second Level Analysis

Methods for Dummies 2011/2012

2Slide3

Normalisation

Statistical Parametric Map

Image time-series

Parameter estimates

General Linear Model

Realignment

Smoothing

Design matrix

Anatomical

reference

Spatial filter

Statistical

Inference

RFT

p <

0.05Slide4

Basis FunctionsTemporal basis functions are used to model a more complex function

Function of interest in fMRI Percent signal change over timeHow to approximate the signal?We have to find the combination of functions that give the best representation of the measured BOLD response

Default in SPM: Canonical hemodynamic response function (HDRF)

Methods for Dummies 2011/2012

4Slide5

Basis FunctionsMany different possible functions can be used

Methods for Dummies 2011/2012

5

Fourier analysis

The complex wave at the top can be decomposed into the sum of the three simpler waves shown below.

f(t)=h1(t)+h2(t)+h3(t)

f(t)

h1(t)

h2(t)

h3(t)

Finite Impulse Response

(FIR)Slide6

Hemodynamic Response Function (HRF)Methods for Dummies 2011/2012

6

Since we know the shape of the hemodynamic response, we should use this knowledge and find a similar function to model the percentage signal change over time.

This is our best prediction

of the signal.

Brief

Stimulus

Undershoot

Initial

Undershoot

Peak

Hemodynamic response functionSlide7

Hemodynamic Response Function(HRF)

Methods for Dummies 2011/20127

Gamma functions Two Gamma functions added

Two gamma functions added together form a good representation of the

haemodynamic

response, although they lack the initial undershoot!Slide8

Fits of a boxcar epoch model with (red) and without (black) convolution by a canonical HRF, together with the data (blue).

HRF versus boxcarSlide9

Limits of HRF

General shape of the BOLD impulse response similar across early sensory regions, such as V1 and S1.

Variability across higher cortical regions.

Considerable variability across people.

These types of variability can be accommodated by expanding the HRF...Slide10

Informed Basis Set

Canonical HRF

Temporal derivative

Dispersion derivative

Methods for Dummies 2011/2012

10

Canonical HRF (2 gamma

functions) plus two expansions in:

Time:

The temporal derivative can model (small) differences in the latency of the peak

response

Width: The

dispersion derivative can model (small) differences in the duration of the peak response.Slide11

Design MatrixMethods for Dummies 2011/2012

11

Left

Right Mean

3

regressors

used to model each condition

The three basis functions are:

1. Canonical HRF

2. Derivatives with respect to time

3. Derivatives with respect to dispersionSlide12

General (convoluted) Linear Model

Ex: Auditory words

every 20s

SPM{F}

0 time {secs} 30

Sampled every

TR = 1.7s

Design matrix,

X

[x(t)

ƒ

1

(

) | x(t)

ƒ

2

(

) |...]

Gamma functions

ƒ

i

(

) of

peristimulus

time

REVIEW DESIGNSlide13

Comparison of the fitted response

Methods for Dummies 2011/201213

Left: Estimation using

the simple

model

Right: More

flexible model with basis

functions

Haemodynamic

response in a single

voxel

. Slide14

SummaryMethods for Dummies 2011/2012

14

SPM uses basis functions to model the hemodynamic response using a single basis function or a set of functions.

The most common choice is the `Canonical HRF' (Default in SPM)

By adding the time and dispersion derivatives one can account for variability in the signal change over

voxelsSlide15

SourcesMethods for Dummies 2011/2012

15

www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/Imaging/Common/rikSPM-GLM.ppt

http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/doc/manual.pdf

And thanks to Guillaume!Slide16

Part II: Correlated regressors

parametric/non-parametric designMethods for Dummies 2011/2012

16Slide17

MulticollinearityMethods for Dummies 2011/2012

17

yi

= ß

0 + ß1xi1 +

ß2xi2

+… +

ß

N

x

iN

+ eCoefficients reflect

an estimated change in y with every unit change in xi while controlling for

all other regressorsSlide18

Multicollinearity

yi = ß0 + ß

1xi1 + ß

2

x

i2 +… + ßNx

iN + e

x

i1

=

l

0 + lxi2 + v

Methods for Dummies 2011/2012

18{

X

i1

(e.g. age)

Xi2

(e.g. chronic disease duration)x

x x

x

x x

x

x

x

x

x

low variance of v

high variance of v

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x x x

x

Xi1

Xi2Slide19

Multicollinearity and estimability

Methods for Dummies 2011/201219

y

e

x

1

x

2

(SPM course Oct. 2010, Guillaume

Flandin

)

OLS minimizes

e

by

Xe

= 0

with

e =

Y – (

X

b

estim

)

-1

which gives

b

estim

= (X

T

X)

-1

X

T

Y

cf

covariance matrix

perfect

multicollinearity

(i.e. variance of

v

= 0)

det

(X) = 0

(

X

T

X

)

not invertible

b

estim

not

unique

high

multicollinearity

(i.e. variance of

v

small)

inaccuracy of individual

b

estim

, high standard error Slide20

MulticollinearityMethods for Dummies 2011/2012

20

X

i

b

estim

R

1

R

2

R

1

(t- and [

unidimensional

] F-) testing of a single

regressor

(e.g. R

1

) =

̂

testing for the component that is

not explained by (is orthogonal to) the other/the reduced model (e.g. R2)

multicollinearity is contrast specific“conflating” correlated regressors by means of (multidimensional) F-contrasts permits assessing common contribution to variance(X

ibestim

= projection of Yi onto X space)Slide21

MulticollinearityMethods for Dummies 2011/2012

21

(relatively) little spread after projection onto

x-axis,

y-axis or f(x) = xreflecting reduced efficiency for detecting dependencies of the observed data on the respective (combination of) regressors

regressor

1 x

hrf

regressor

2 x

hrf

(MRC

CBU Cambridge,

http

://imaging.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/imaging/DesignEfficiency)Slide22

Orthogonality matrix

Methods for Dummies 2011/201222

reflects the cosine of the angles

between respective pairs of columns

(SPM course Oct. 2010, Guillaume

Flandin

)Slide23

OrthogonalizingMethods for Dummies 2011/2012

23

X

b

estim

R

1

R

2

new

R

1

orth

R

2

leaves the parameter estimate of R

1

unchanged but alters the estimate of the R

2

parameter

a

ssumes unambiguous causality between the

orthogonalized

predictor and the dependent variable by attributing the common variance to this one predictor

only

hence rarely justifiedSlide24

Dealing with multicollinearity

Methods for Dummies 2011/201224

Avoid.

(avoid dummy variables; when

sequential scheme of predictors (stimulus – response) is inevitable: inject jittered delay (see B) or use a

probabilistic R1-R

2

sequence (see C))

Obtain more

data to decrease standard

error of parameter estimates

Use F-contrasts to assess common contribution to data variance

Orthogonalizing

might lead to self-fulfilling prophecies

(MRC CBU Cambridge, http

://imaging.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/imaging/DesignEfficiency)Slide25

Parametric vs. factorial design

Methods for Dummies 2011/201225

factorial

parametric

Widely-used example

(Statistical Parametric Mapping,

Friston

et al. 2007)

Four button press forcesSlide26

Parametric vs. factorial design

Methods for Dummies 2011/201226

factorial

parametric

W

hich

when?

Limited prior knowledge, flexibility in contrasting beneficial (“screening”):

Large number of levels/continuous range:Slide27

Methods for Dummies 2011/2012

27Happy mapping!