/
Criminal Law 171 Criminal Law 171

Criminal Law 171 - PowerPoint Presentation

luanne-stotts
luanne-stotts . @luanne-stotts
Follow
386 views
Uploaded On 2017-05-01

Criminal Law 171 - PPT Presentation

Presented by Chantelle Golombick Technical Presentation Arial 12 15 line spacing Normal margins 254cm 05 indentation No line spaces between headings and paragraphs or between subsequent paragraphs ID: 543600

question research case law research question law case sources legal words line judgment analyse writing aims points answer introduction

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Criminal Law 171" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Criminal Law 171

Presented by: Chantelle GolombickSlide2

Technical Presentation

Arial 12

1,5 line spacing

Normal margins (2,54cm)

0,5 indentation

No line spaces between headings and paragraphs or between subsequent paragraphs

Footers Arial 10, single line spacing

Out of text quotations Arial 11, single line spacing, 0,5 indentation

http://blogs.sun.ac.za/legalwriting/files/2015/02/Starter-Pack-2015.rar

Slide3

Research question and aims

Research question

: What is the particular question that the research will address

?

A strong research

question

should pass the “so what” test. Think about the potential impact of the research you are proposing. What is the benefit of answering your research question? Who will it help (and how)?

– these are your aims.

Refer to your guidelines:

Aims

=

want to achieve with the research.

What do you want to (or need to) do in this project?

What points do you want to prove?

What debates would you like to analyse?

What aspects of the law/issue/debate do you want to discuss?Slide4

Methodology

What methods are you going to use to answer your research question?

What sources are you going to consult?

How are these sources going to assist you to answer your research question?

Are they the most appropriate, up to date and academic sources relevant to your topic?

What approach are you going to adopt to analyse and evaluate your materials? E.g. critically analyse, comparative

study?Slide5

Introduction

The primary purpose of an introduction is not to summarise the content of your paper. The purpose of an introduction is simply to explain to your reader

what you are writing about

as well as

the legal context

within which your discussion takes place.

This could include some background to your research and setting out the research problem.

Consider the topic on the South African legal position regarding euthanasia:

What is the current position, what happened that we want to write about this and in what context will we be writing? Slide6

Formulate an argument

Before you start, ensure that you know exactly what point you want to prove – you can only do this if you understand your question.

Consider the various reasons why your point of view is the right one, and very important – find proof for those reasons.

Proof can be found in legislation and case law - Do not summarise

! Look at footnotes / bibliography in case law.

Ask yourself whether the judgment is contradictory, whether it is in line with previous case law, whether it rests upon the best possible interpretation of the relevant legal principles, the Constitution (or other legislation)Slide7

Analyse case law

Identify the parties – Plaintiff / Defendant of Applicant / Respondent.

Read the headnote of the case – this will indicate the main legal points argued

Read

the judgment at the end - reasons.

Now that you have a basic understanding of the legal points of the case and the outcome, read carefully through the complete judgment.

Make sure you can explain what was decided, by whom (e.g. was it a majority), was there a minority (dissenting) and most importantly the reasoning for the judgment.

Apply the reasoning to your argument. Slide8

Conclusion

Briefly outline the structure of your central argument.

Provide an answer to your research question.

Page 38 of the Writing Guide /

Bladsy

34 van die Skryfgids Slide9

Plagiarism

You should reference / acknowledge a source when you:

summarise the main idea of an entire work in your own words;

paraphrase a source’s idea(s) or words;

use verbatim words / sentences from sources – in addition to acknowledging your sources in this instance, you also need to place double quotation marks around the verbatim words or sentence(s) in the text where they appear.

As a rule, you should always remember that whenever words or ideas are borrowed from sources such as books, magazines, newspapers, songs, movies, websites, etcetera, the author’s work must be acknowledged by including an appropriate reference.

NB: http://blogs.sun.ac.za/legalwriting/writing-guide/Slide10