/
How to recognise symptoms of How to recognise symptoms of

How to recognise symptoms of - PowerPoint Presentation

luanne-stotts
luanne-stotts . @luanne-stotts
Follow
379 views
Uploaded On 2015-10-19

How to recognise symptoms of - PPT Presentation

appearancerelated distress   How do we recognise symptoms of appearance related distress Does it relate to physical indicators eg Severity amp extent of the difference in appearance ID: 165645

body appearance distress face appearance body face distress severity assessment visible location advantages psychometric disadvantages methods moss amp physical

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "How to recognise symptoms of" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

How to recognise symptoms ofappearance-related distress  Slide2

How do we recognise symptoms of appearance related distress?

Does it relate to physical indicators, e.g.

Severity & extent of the ‘difference’ in appearance?

Location/body site affected?Other

indicators …..

Face to face interaction/discussions

Observing behaviourPsychometric methodsSlide3

Severity & extent of the ‘difference’

& adjustment

Anecdotally,

the severity of a difference in appearance is associated

with poor adjustment

But . . . Slide4

Who is most self conscious

of their appearance?Slide5

Who is most self conscious

of their appearance?

WE CAN’T POSSIBLY KNOW FROM THESE PHOTOGRAPHSSlide6

Physical indicators: Severity & location

In a study by Moss (2005), over

500 participants with body image concerns (e.g., weight, size) and / or visible differences (e.g., scarring, burns)

rated their levels of wellbeing in reltion

to their appearance.Slide7

The impact of the severity of a difference in appearance

Half of

these

500 participants self-assessed how different they looked from the norm

The other

half

were assessed by plastic surgeon (appearance expert) as to how different they looked from the ‘norm’Slide8

Moss (2005): Severity analysis

The

Self

assessed severity ratings of appearance differences –

did

predict

levels of well being, howeverSurgeon assessed

severity ratings of appearance differences – did not

predict well beingSlide9

How different someone THINKS they look predicts well being

How different someone ACTUALLY looks does NOT predict well beingSlide10

Examples:

Alan feels unable to socialise with his peers. When in conversation, he often covers his mouth with his hands, and if possible, avoids talking at all. He is self-conscious “

because

of my bad habit of keeping my mouth open my bottom lip has become really fat.” Others do not perceive his mouth as looking different.

Bob is a shop assistant in his town. He enjoys meeting regular customers and new people. He is aware of scarring on his lips following an infection, and sometimes gets asked about it. However, he is used to this, and does not consider this a very significant part of his life.Slide11

Examples:

Carol has a birth mark about 3cm in diameter on her neck. She is terribly concerned that this is noticeable to everyone she meets, and that they will imagine that this is a “love bite”, and assume she is promiscuous. As a result of this, she avoids others as far as possible, and if she needs to leave the house, always wears a scarf (which she continually re-adjusts)

Diana was scalded by steam as a child when she opened the radiator in her parents’ car. She has extensive visible scarring on her arms and neck. However, she has grown up accepting the attention this sometimes generates, and is practiced at

f

ielding questions. Her work as a teacher, and personal relationships have not been unduly affected by her feelings about appearance.Slide12

Body site/

physical location of a ‘difference’ in appearance

Moss (2005) found that the

physical location

of

the affected body site(s) is a

poor predictor of well beingAreas which are not normally visible

to others (eg those hidden by clothes are as

influential as normally visible areas – see graph on next slide).In

female samples, sensitivity about abdomen/breasts is most associated with poor well beingSlide13

Taller column indicates more distress associated with sensitivity about this body part

Appearance distress

Moss (2005) location analysisSlide14

Taller column indicates more distress associated with sensitivity about this body part

Appearance distress

Sexually significant,

Normally kept hidden

Sexually significant,

Normally kept hidden

Low numbers, unreliable figure

Moss (2005) location analysisSlide15

Non-visible areas of difference (including size differences, skin conditions, scarring, etc.) can

sometimes be

associated with MORE distress than normally visible areas

Non-visible areas introduce the problem of carrying a “secret”

When, and to whom, is the “secret” revealed?

Especially

an issue in relation to romantic/sexual relationshipsSlide16

Other methods of recognising appearance-related distress

Face to face discussion?

Observing behaviour?

Psychometric assessment?

Appropriate for vocational trainers

Appropriate for psychologistsSlide17

Face to face discussionACTIVITY – identify potential advantages/disadvantages of face-to-face assessment

Advantages

DisadvantagesSlide18

Face to face discussion

Advantages

Flexibility

Depth - can cover variety of times and domains

Individualistic

Disadvantages

Highly skilled

Time

Unreliable assessment

Subject to biasSlide19

Observing behaviour

Anxiety symptoms

Social avoidanceNervousness

BlushingSocial awkwardnessNot necessarily the case that these are caused by appearance anxietySlide20

Observing behaviour

Is there an unusually high preoccupation with appearance,

eg

reflected in…Behaviours and conversationConcealing aspects of body (gestures/clothing)

Checking mirrors/reflection more than necessary

Appearance

concerns disrupting the person’s ability to function (causes lateness, cancellations of appointments, avoidance of social situations, anxiety about interviews

etc).Slide21

Observing behaviour

Advantages

Focus on individual

Can analyse social interaction in depth

Disadvantages

Requires high level of skill

Time consuming

Which behaviours?

Context specific

behaviours may be

missedSlide22

Psychometrics – assessment by psychology professionals

Trainers may refer

people to psychologists for a more

formal assessmentTrainers may be supplied with a formal assessment by a psychologist and may need to interpret/understand thisSlide23

Psychometrics – assessment by psychology

professionals: Advantages

Is carefully defined

– Clarity needed about what is being measuredHas known validity –

Assesses the aspect we think

we

want to assessIs reliable – Measurement is likely to be consistent over timeSlide24

What are we measuring when we measure body image?Slide25

Activity:

Think about what your appearance means to you, and how it affects your thoughts, feelings, and behaviours.

What questions would

you need to be asked to enable you to communicate this to someone else?Slide26

Challenges of psychometric assessment

When assessing appearance concern using psychometric methods, there are a plethora of scales, often measuring very similar sounding thingsSlide27

Body image

Weight satisfaction

Size perception accuracy

Body satisfaction

Appearance satisfaction

Appearance evaluation

Body esteem

Appearance orientation

Body concern

Body

dysphoria

Body

dysmorphia

Body schema

Body

perception

Body distortion

(Thompson,

Heinberg

, Altabe, &

Tantleff

-Dunn, 1999)Slide28

When interpreting psychometric assessments of body image and appearance concerns, it is important to know which aspects a measure

HAS and HAS NOT assessed.Slide29

Valid and reliable assessment

Known constructs used

Quick/easy

Can track change/outcomes

Psychometric assessment

Advantages

Disadvantages

Which

constructs to measure?

May oversimplify

Language/literacy skills

Data managementSlide30

Gender differences

Men

tend to evaluate and discuss the body as

one entity"I like, sort of my, the whole bit

that is relatively slim, and it's all together so to speak, nothing’s out of place.. areas I don’t like, um, my stomach especially, when it flops over the

trousers”

(Man, 33)

"I’m happy with it, yeah.. it’s

an overall thing”

(Man, 39

)Slide31

Women conceptualise the body as

many distinct parts

"I have quite a naturally flat

stomach, which I like a lot, and I’ve got my stomach pierced because I like the way it looks with that… I’m pleased with my stomach and I try to do sit-ups just to keep it looking okay... I don’t mind my back, I think that looks alright, I’m not very keen on my

legs

because I think they look very stumpy. Um.. and I think they’re also, they don’t seem to have a lot of shape… they just look like sticks, matchsticks (laughing).. um I like my

arms I think they’re fine um.. my

bum’s

alright (laughing) a bit dimply sometimes and I’d probably choose to have bigger boobs

if I

could”

(Woman, 24

)Slide32

Activity:

Who

might need to recognise

“symptoms” of appearance distress? Is the word “symptoms” a problem

? What associations/subtexts does

it

convey?Slide33

Summary

Physical characteristics are poor predictors of appearance self-consciousnessFace-to-face or observational methods provide one way of assessing self-consciousness

Psychologists may use more systematic, psychometric methods