/
Abd Abd

Abd - PowerPoint Presentation

marina-yarberry
marina-yarberry . @marina-yarberry
Follow
385 views
Uploaded On 2016-10-18

Abd - PPT Presentation

Azis Bin Bon Cao Jing Edward Bauer Herman Bin Md Tahir Jongkwan Lee Magnus Ohlson Muhammad Azam Bin Alias Risto Nevalainen Susan Burgess Ton van Bergeijk Adalberto Crespo Celestina Bianco ID: 477683

testing part 29119 iso part testing iso 29119 iec test ieee tmmi group process documentation standard countries voted working

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Abd" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1
Slide2
Slide3

Abd

Azis

Bin Bon

Cao Jing

Edward Bauer

Herman Bin Md Tahir

Jongkwan Lee

Magnus Ohlson

Muhammad Azam Bin Alias

Risto Nevalainen

Susan Burgess

Ton van Bergeijk

Adalberto

Crespo

Celestina Bianco

Eric Gauthier

Hohaeng Cho

Juichi Takahashi

Manikandan

K

N Swaminathan

Rolf

Ziegler

Sylvia Veeraraghavan

Tristan Brown

Alistair Walker

Cerys

Giddings

Fernando Gebara Filho

Hyung jin Yoon

Jung-hwan Kim

Manus Chakraborty

Nathalie van Delft

Satomi Yoshizawa

Tafline Ramos (Murnane)

Tsuneo Yamaura

Alphonse

Philipe

Cerys Willoughby

Francois Coallier

Ian Hurst

Kazuo Yabuta

Mariye Akkaya

Ogawa Kiyoshi

Satoshi Masuda

Tan Liqun

Ursula Parker

Amiruddin

Jaafar

Sidek

Chai Afeng

Francois Darphin

Ine

Lutterman

Keerthishankar K N

Mastura Abu Samah

Ola Perman

Shankaranarayanan G A

Terry Rout

Vijay Sampath

Anne Mette

Hass

Cheng (Kevin) Geng

Gary Roedler

James Moore

Keum-Ran

Lee

Matt Mansell

Ossi Taipale

Shinji Iwata

Theresa Hunt

Wonil

Kwon

Arun Kumar Melkote

Cheong Jeong Seo

Grantham Daniels

Javier Tuya

Klaudia

Dussa-Zieger

Matthias

Daigl

Patricia Huyos

Soo-yeon Lee

Thomas George

Yasuhara Nishi

Atsushi Mitomi

Cheryl George

Guizhi (Tracy) Yang

Jean-Louis Michel

Kouichi Akiyama

Matthias Rasking

Paula Angeieri

Steve Wilsher

Thomas Kurihara

Yu-Whoan Ahn

Barbara Huisman

Cheryl Jones

Gustavo Valencia

Jim

Moore

Kwangik Seo

Michael Crerar

Qin

Liu

Stuart Reid

Tim Archer

Yuji Shinoki

Beatrix Barafort

Dan-Hyung Lee

Hack-Youp Noh

Jon Hagar

Kwanho Kim

Moohee Han

Radoslaw Hofman

SuJin Choi

Tohru Matsuodani

Yumoto

Tsuyoshi

Boris

Pozin

Dnyanada

Wagh

Hareton

Leung

Jonathan

Earthy

Leon Gerber

Magnus

Ohlson

Ricardo

Cristalli

Sunny

Kwon

Tom Wissink

Liliana

Gomez

ArenasSlide4

Alistair Walker, Alphonse

Phillipe

, Anne Mette

Hass, Jon Hagar, Matthias Daigl, Qin Liu

Stuart Reid, Sylvia Veeraraghavan,Tafline Ramos (Murnane), Tom Wissink, Ursula Parker, Wonil KwonSlide5

PROCESSSlide6
Slide7
Slide8

BS 7925-1

BS 7925-2

IEEE 829

Concepts & Vocabulary

Part 1

ISO/IEC 29119 –Structure

Process

Assessment

‘Part 5’

Testing

Techniques

Part 4

Documentation

Part 3

Part 2

Processes

Actually ISO/IEC 33063Slide9

Part 1 Software Testing ConceptsSlide10

Part 1

v

iew on heuristics

“5.1.3 Testing as a Heuristic

In engineering (and software engineering) a heuristic is an experience-based (trial and error) method that can be

used

as

an

aid

to

problem

solving

and design. However, while heuristics can

be used to solve problems

, they are fallible

in that sometimes they may not solve, or only

partially solve, a problem.

“Recognition that the manner in which testing is undertaken

may be fallible allows

us to mitigate the risk of an

ineffective test strategy by employing multiple test

strategies.”Slide11

Part 2 – Test Process

XSlide12

Part 3 – Test Documentation

Agreed text based on IEEE 829 (making it normative)Slide13

Part 3 Test

DocumentationSlide14

Part 3 Test

DocumentationSlide15

Part 3 Test

DocumentationSlide16

Part 5

Keyword

Driven Testing

Part 6 ISO/IEC 33063Process Assessment Model for Software TestingAgile extension?!Slide17
Slide18

Washington 2010

Vote 1:

Static testing is a part of testing.

For: 6

(countries voted for: Australia, China, Denmark, India, South Korea, Sweden) Against: 4 (countries voted against: Canada, Japan, South Africa, USA) Abstain: noneMajority is for. Static testing is a part of testing.Vote 2: Inspections are a separate approach (not part of testing). For: 4 (countries voted for: Canada, Japan, South Africa, USA) Against: 5 (countries voted against: Australia, China, Denmark, India, South Korea)

Abstain: 1

(Sweden)

Majority is against. Inspections are not a separate approach (i.e. inspections are a part of testing).Slide19

ISO Liaisons

V

&V Study Group

WG4 (Tools NWIP)WG7 (12207/Static Testing)

WG10 (Test Process Assessment)WG42 (Architecture Evaluation NWIP)DIN (Keywords NWIP)WG6 (Metrics/Definitions)Framework for Product Quality Achievement SGSystem Integration SGSlide20

Liaison

with

TMMiBenefits of a liaison with

TMMi:Free marketing of the 29119 standard by TMMi, which would be a new market for WG26The opportunity for sales of the 29119 standard to

members of the

TMMi

community

and

users of

TMMi

material

Access

to

experts

from TMMi to contribute

to and comment on 29119standardsSlide21

Other

Liasons

European Telecommunications Standards InstituteMethods for

Testing SpecificationsFree marketing of the 29119 standard by ETSI to a market of security testers who may not have visibility of the standard at presentISTQB

Request

,

by

Rex Black, in November 2008 but

not

finalised

then

.

Re-

proposed in November 2014Slide22
Slide23

Petition

To

the President of the International

Organization for Standardisation,

We, the undersigned, hereby petition the International Organization for Standardisation to suspend publication of ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119-4 and

ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119-5,

and

to

withdraw

ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119-1, ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119-2

and

ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119-3.

It

is

our

view that significant

disagreement and sustained opposition exists

amongst professional testers as

to the validity of these standards, and that there is no consensus (per definition

1.7 of ISO/IEC Guide 2:2004) as to their content.Slide24

The

working

group discussed the „Stop 29119‟ campaignThe working

group agreed that the article that Stuart published on the softwaretestingstandard.org website rebutting the arguments of the 29119

campaign

was a

suitable

response

to

the

campaign

.

The

working

group agreed that it would

be beneficial to upload links and

documents to

the softwaretestingstandard.org website that debunk the myths that are being

spread on the standards and on the working group

by the campaigners.

Related Contents


Next Show more