Azis Bin Bon Cao Jing Edward Bauer Herman Bin Md Tahir Jongkwan Lee Magnus Ohlson Muhammad Azam Bin Alias Risto Nevalainen Susan Burgess Ton van Bergeijk Adalberto Crespo Celestina Bianco ID: 477683
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Abd" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1Slide2Slide3
Abd
Azis
Bin Bon
Cao Jing
Edward Bauer
Herman Bin Md Tahir
Jongkwan Lee
Magnus Ohlson
Muhammad Azam Bin Alias
Risto Nevalainen
Susan Burgess
Ton van Bergeijk
Adalberto
Crespo
Celestina Bianco
Eric Gauthier
Hohaeng Cho
Juichi Takahashi
Manikandan
K
N Swaminathan
Rolf
Ziegler
Sylvia Veeraraghavan
Tristan Brown
Alistair Walker
Cerys
Giddings
Fernando Gebara Filho
Hyung jin Yoon
Jung-hwan Kim
Manus Chakraborty
Nathalie van Delft
Satomi Yoshizawa
Tafline Ramos (Murnane)
Tsuneo Yamaura
Alphonse
Philipe
Cerys Willoughby
Francois Coallier
Ian Hurst
Kazuo Yabuta
Mariye Akkaya
Ogawa Kiyoshi
Satoshi Masuda
Tan Liqun
Ursula Parker
Amiruddin
Jaafar
Sidek
Chai Afeng
Francois Darphin
Ine
Lutterman
Keerthishankar K N
Mastura Abu Samah
Ola Perman
Shankaranarayanan G A
Terry Rout
Vijay Sampath
Anne Mette
Hass
Cheng (Kevin) Geng
Gary Roedler
James Moore
Keum-Ran
Lee
Matt Mansell
Ossi Taipale
Shinji Iwata
Theresa Hunt
Wonil
Kwon
Arun Kumar Melkote
Cheong Jeong Seo
Grantham Daniels
Javier Tuya
Klaudia
Dussa-Zieger
Matthias
Daigl
Patricia Huyos
Soo-yeon Lee
Thomas George
Yasuhara Nishi
Atsushi Mitomi
Cheryl George
Guizhi (Tracy) Yang
Jean-Louis Michel
Kouichi Akiyama
Matthias Rasking
Paula Angeieri
Steve Wilsher
Thomas Kurihara
Yu-Whoan Ahn
Barbara Huisman
Cheryl Jones
Gustavo Valencia
Jim
Moore
Kwangik Seo
Michael Crerar
Qin
Liu
Stuart Reid
Tim Archer
Yuji Shinoki
Beatrix Barafort
Dan-Hyung Lee
Hack-Youp Noh
Jon Hagar
Kwanho Kim
Moohee Han
Radoslaw Hofman
SuJin Choi
Tohru Matsuodani
Yumoto
Tsuyoshi
Boris
Pozin
Dnyanada
Wagh
Hareton
Leung
Jonathan
Earthy
Leon Gerber
Magnus
Ohlson
Ricardo
Cristalli
Sunny
Kwon
Tom Wissink
Liliana
Gomez
ArenasSlide4
Alistair Walker, Alphonse
Phillipe
, Anne Mette
Hass, Jon Hagar, Matthias Daigl, Qin Liu
Stuart Reid, Sylvia Veeraraghavan,Tafline Ramos (Murnane), Tom Wissink, Ursula Parker, Wonil KwonSlide5
PROCESSSlide6Slide7Slide8
BS 7925-1
BS 7925-2
IEEE 829
Concepts & Vocabulary
Part 1
ISO/IEC 29119 –Structure
Process
Assessment
‘Part 5’
Testing
Techniques
Part 4
Documentation
Part 3
Part 2
Processes
Actually ISO/IEC 33063Slide9
Part 1 Software Testing ConceptsSlide10
Part 1
v
iew on heuristics
“5.1.3 Testing as a Heuristic
In engineering (and software engineering) a heuristic is an experience-based (trial and error) method that can be
used
as
an
aid
to
problem
solving
and design. However, while heuristics can
be used to solve problems
, they are fallible
in that sometimes they may not solve, or only
partially solve, a problem.
“Recognition that the manner in which testing is undertaken
may be fallible allows
us to mitigate the risk of an
ineffective test strategy by employing multiple test
strategies.”Slide11
Part 2 – Test Process
XSlide12
Part 3 – Test Documentation
Agreed text based on IEEE 829 (making it normative)Slide13
Part 3 Test
DocumentationSlide14
Part 3 Test
DocumentationSlide15
Part 3 Test
DocumentationSlide16
Part 5
Keyword
Driven Testing
Part 6 ISO/IEC 33063Process Assessment Model for Software TestingAgile extension?!Slide17Slide18
Washington 2010
Vote 1:
Static testing is a part of testing.
For: 6
(countries voted for: Australia, China, Denmark, India, South Korea, Sweden) Against: 4 (countries voted against: Canada, Japan, South Africa, USA) Abstain: noneMajority is for. Static testing is a part of testing.Vote 2: Inspections are a separate approach (not part of testing). For: 4 (countries voted for: Canada, Japan, South Africa, USA) Against: 5 (countries voted against: Australia, China, Denmark, India, South Korea)
Abstain: 1
(Sweden)
Majority is against. Inspections are not a separate approach (i.e. inspections are a part of testing).Slide19
ISO Liaisons
V
&V Study Group
WG4 (Tools NWIP)WG7 (12207/Static Testing)
WG10 (Test Process Assessment)WG42 (Architecture Evaluation NWIP)DIN (Keywords NWIP)WG6 (Metrics/Definitions)Framework for Product Quality Achievement SGSystem Integration SGSlide20
Liaison
with
TMMiBenefits of a liaison with
TMMi:Free marketing of the 29119 standard by TMMi, which would be a new market for WG26The opportunity for sales of the 29119 standard to
members of the
TMMi
community
and
users of
TMMi
material
Access
to
experts
from TMMi to contribute
to and comment on 29119standardsSlide21
Other
Liasons
European Telecommunications Standards InstituteMethods for
Testing SpecificationsFree marketing of the 29119 standard by ETSI to a market of security testers who may not have visibility of the standard at presentISTQB
Request
,
by
Rex Black, in November 2008 but
not
finalised
then
.
Re-
proposed in November 2014Slide22Slide23
Petition
To
the President of the International
Organization for Standardisation,
We, the undersigned, hereby petition the International Organization for Standardisation to suspend publication of ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119-4 and
ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119-5,
and
to
withdraw
ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119-1, ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119-2
and
ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119-3.
It
is
our
view that significant
disagreement and sustained opposition exists
amongst professional testers as
to the validity of these standards, and that there is no consensus (per definition
1.7 of ISO/IEC Guide 2:2004) as to their content.Slide24
The
working
group discussed the „Stop 29119‟ campaignThe working
group agreed that the article that Stuart published on the softwaretestingstandard.org website rebutting the arguments of the 29119
campaign
was a
suitable
response
to
the
campaign
.
The
working
group agreed that it would
be beneficial to upload links and
documents to
the softwaretestingstandard.org website that debunk the myths that are being
spread on the standards and on the working group
by the campaigners.