PPT-Fallout: Housing Discrimination and Disparate Impact After

Inclusive Communities Harry Kelly Nixon Peabody LLP Michael Skojec Ballard Spahr LLP Moderator Paula Cino NMHC VP July 30 2015 Fair Housing Act Background Passed 1968 Multiple later amendments that expanded number of protected classes. : Take out Fuel Cycle Cards to practice! You should be getting good by now! Practice ordering them using the description of the step, not the name of the step!. Hwk. : STUDY. Multiple Choice part of Quiz tomorrow!. INDIANA LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 84:773 Litigants and courts can and do cherry pick those statistics that produce the desired results. This problem is particularly acute in Title VII disparate impact discrim A legal update from Dechert LLP Related Practices Real Estate U.S. Department of Justice Turns Spotlight on Disparate Impact Discrimination ClaimsFair lending is back with a giant thud! In addition to ‘Discrimination’. Law and Justice. Federal Discriminatory Statutes. . - 3 primary prohibit employment discrimination. a. . Title VI: Civil Rights Act of . 1964. . b. . Age Discrimination in Employment Act . The Fair Housing Act. It is unlawful to make a dwelling unavailable to any person because of race, color, religion, sex, familial status, national origin, or handicap. . 42 USC § 3604(a)-(f). It is unlawful to discriminate against any person in a real estate related transaction (terms or conditions) because they are a member of a protected class. . prima facie case . (i.e., . that challenged rule has racially disparate impact). Fair Housing Act’s System . of . Disparate Impact Burden-Shifting. Δ. π. Statistical evidence of disparate impact. The Fair Housing Act. It is unlawful to make a dwelling unavailable to any person because of race, color, religion, sex, familial status, national origin, or handicap. . 42 USC § 3604(a)-(f). It is unlawful to discriminate against any person in a real estate related transaction (terms or conditions) because they are a member of a protected class. . Mechanisms to Mitigate Unfairness. Krishna P. . Gummadi. Joint work with . Muhammad . Bilal . Zafar. , Isabel Valera, . Manuel . Gomez-Rodriguez. Max Planck Institute for Software Systems. Context: Machine decision . LEGAL ISSUES. Criminal Records Issues. Immigration. I-9. Everify. AND OTHERS. Some of the Issues. Fair Housing. Disparate Impact. HUD Guidance. How do we follow all of the rules?. Best practices and ideas. Legal environments of business . Employment discrimination. Treating individuals differently in the various aspects of employment (hiring, firing, promotions, awarding of benefits, wages, etc.) based on race, color, gender, pregnancy, and pregnancy intentions, age (40 or older), religion, disability, and national origin. . Ensuring compliance in an ever changing world!. with. Doug Chasick, CPM. ®. , CAPS, CAS, Adv. RAM, CLP, SLE, CDEI. President, The Fair Housing Institute, Inc.. The current state of fair housing affairs. Audra H. Nelson, M.S. 2009. Learning Objectives. By the end of this module, students will be able to:. Define adverse impact discrimination and perform the legally accepted calculation to discern if it exists in a given situation.. Dissecting disparate impact: Ensuring compliance in an ever changing world! with Doug Chasick, CPM ® , CAPS, CAS, Adv. RAM, CLP, SLE, CDEI President, The Fair Housing Institute, Inc. The current state of fair housing affairs Fair Housing Project. Legal Aid of North Carolina. 2101 Angier Ave., . Ste. 300. Durham, NC 27703. 1-855-797-FAIR. www.FairHousingnc.org. The work that provided the basis for this publication was supported by funding under a grant with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The substance and finding of the work are dedicated to the public. The author and publisher are solely responsible for the accuracy of the statements and interpretations contained in this publication. Such interpretations do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Government..