Abdulrahman Alazemi Shahroze Abbas Liam Lewis Donald Ta Ann Vo Overview Clustered repeats Wide variety of functions History largely unknown Regulatory Sites A segment capable of altering expression of specific genes ID: 563144
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Clustered Repeats and Regulatory Sites" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Clustered Repeats and Regulatory Sites
Abdulrahman
Alazemi
,
Shahroze
Abbas, Liam Lewis, Donald Ta, Ann VoSlide2
Overview
Clustered repeats
Wide variety of functions
History largely unknown
Regulatory Sites
A segment capable of altering expression of specific genes
Various classifications of regulatory sequences
Found in non-coding regions
Functions at the transcriptional levelSlide3
Identification
Consensus sequences
Utilize PSSM
How?
Determine consensusSlide4
Clustered repeats and potential regulatory sequences
Abdulrahman
AlazemiSlide5
Background;
Transcription factors?
Activators Vs Repressors.Slide6
Thoughts;
- My questions;
Can I apply a known method/tool with a known results to other phage and get the same/similar result?Slide7
The known case;
Examine the proven Repressor and Cro binding sites (operators) of Phage Lambda.
Bioinformatics method in the notes.
First “Name of Lambda in BioBike”.
Go to BioBike/Phantome.Slide8
The known case;
Second; Motifs in for the upstream sequence of phage Lambda.
Labeled, DNA, Multiple-Hits-ok.Slide9
The known case;
Results of motifs in.
More than one interesting case.
Motifs 1, 2 , 3.Slide10
The known case;
BioBike function;
Description-analysis
submenu, Genes-
proteins menu.
Now, we have an
idea about where
to look.Slide11
The known case;
Used the function sequence-of from Genome menu.
Go to the specific region in the genomeSlide12
The known case;
Finding the operators.
Directly Vs inversion of.Slide13
Phage Lambda map;Slide14
Thoughts;
- My concern/focus;
Would I find some sort of generality between operators of different phages?Slide15
My experiment;
Twenty one random phages of different phage families.
Eight of them don't have repressors. (eliminated)
Three of the 13 phages left didn't display a map because of linear amplicon.
Ten phages out of 21 went through all the steps of the method/tool successfully and gave me back out come that I can work with.
Three out of 10 have similar results to phage Lambda. Slide16
Outcome analysis;
- Similar to phage lambda:
-Bacillus-phage-1Slide17
Phage
Bacillus-phage-1 map;
Slide18
Outcome analysis;
-Similar to phage Lambda:
-Listeria-phage-A006Slide19
Phage Listeria-phage-A006 map;Slide20
Outcome analysis;
-Similar to phage lambda:
-
Lactobacillus-johnsonii-prophage-Lj928Slide21
Phage
Lactobacillus-johnsonii-prophage-Lj928 map;
Slide22
First conclusion;
- Out of 21 or 10 phages, only 3 phages are similar to phage Lambda.
- Less than 50%.
- No Generality.
- Appropriate conclusion;
- Phage Lambda, Bacillus-phage-1, Listeria-phage-A006 , and
Lactobacillus-johnsonii-prophage-Lj928 have a similarity/generality between their operators that the repressors bind to.
Slide23
Inspiration;
- Dead end.
- The articles !!!!
- Extend my research.
- look for something interesting.Slide24
First interesting case;
- In Burkholderia-phage-Bcep1.
- Six similar sequence in one intergenic region
- another 6 similar sequences in another intergenic region.
- Palindromic sequences.
- 6 or 3 sequences ?
- Bacillus-phage-1 is similar to Burkholderia-phage-Bcep1 somehow.
Slide25
First interesting case;Slide26
Phage Burkholderia-phage-Bcep1 map;Slide27
Second interesting case;
- In phage Clostridium-phage-39-O.
- Eight nucleotides sequence (
TTACTACA)
repeated 10 times in one intergenic sequence.
- Again the same sequence repeated 8 times in another intergenic sequence in another place on the phage.Slide28
Second interesting case;Slide29
Phage Clostridium-phage-39-O map;Slide30
Conclusion;
- Goals;
- Pick one interesting case.
- Research it.
- Make sense of it.Slide31
A. Comparison of Pseudomonas
putida
and
Azotobacter
REP sequences
Donald TaSlide32
REPs
Repetitive
Extragenic
Palindromic Sequences
Found mainly in abundance in
Enterobacteriaecae
Can be anywhere around 20 to 40
nt
long
Clustered into structures called BIMEs (bacterial interspersed mosaic element) as two inverted tandem repeats separated by a short linker of variable lengthSlide33
What do REPs do?
Regulate Gene Expression
Structuring DNA
Specific target sites for bacterial insertion sequences
Possibly more that are undiscoveredSlide34
Previous Study
I.
Aranda-Olmedo
2002 used BLAST (Basic local alignment search tool) to find regions of local similarity between sequences downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)
Used database with all
contigs
of Pseudomonas
putida
already available in The Institute for Genome Research
Developed their own program to screen all of the strains against the 35
nt
sequence 5’-CCGGCCTCTTCGCGGGTAAGCCCGCTCCTACAGGG-3’Slide35
Results of that StudySlide36
Implications from that study
They suggest that the 35
bp
element they found is species specific in P.
putida
First time that REP sequences have been described and characterized in a group of non-
enterobacteriaceaeSlide37
What am I doing?
Comparing REP sequence element of Pseudomonas
putida
KT2440 with
Azotobacter
vanlandii
Why?
Order
Pseudomonadales
Used the REP element that is most common among Pseudomonas species “
GCGGGnnnnCCCGC
”Slide38
Methods
Used built-in functions of
BioBike
to scan a sequence for possibly loose matches of a pattern
“****GCGGG****CCCGC****” sequence iterated over the sequence of the organism of interest and then whenever there was a match it was displayed on the output
“*” means an unspecified amino acidSlide39
Findings
52 sequence hits in
Azotobacter
vanlandii
that appear to have the same conserved region found in Pseudomonas
putida
The species share similar REP elements with the same conserved central palindromic region
“GCGGG****CCCGC”Slide40
OutputSlide41
Significance
REP sequences mainly found abundantly in
Enterobacteriacaea
Study by
Bao
Ton-Hoang 2012 suggested that
transposases
could’ve been responsible for the proliferation of REP sequences in the genomes of bacteria in
Enterobacteriacaea
Possibly suggest a similar origin of REP sequences/elements for Pseudomonas and
Enterobacteriacaea
?Slide42
Problems?
Found 2 hits in E. Coli K-12 that had the REP element
Maybe suggests similar origin?
Could be just a fluke/just by chance that these two organisms share the same REP element in abundance
Past Study found 804 REP sequences with that REP element in Pseudomonas
putida
I found 52 in
Azotobacter
vanlandiiSlide43
Possible plans of the future/near future?
Compare with other bacteria in the order of
Pseudomondas
to see if I get similar results
Possibly try to find a link to how REP sequences started proliferating in bacteria outside of
EnterobacteriacaeSlide44
Positional Preference of Rho-Independent Transcriptional Terminators in E. Coli
Ann VoSlide45
Transcriptional Terminators
Rho-independent
Specific activities poorly
understood
Occurs
in ssDNA and
RNA
Unique characteristics:
T
-Tract: 12-15
nt
GC-rich stem: 4-18
ntSlide46
Transcriptional Terminators
Available algorithms:
RNAMotif
TransTermHP
ARNold
About 317 natural terminators found in E.
Coli
Lai et al. (2013) found a positional preference between other regulatory sequences
Do transcriptional terminators have a positional preference relative to the end of the gene?Slide47
ARNold
Erpin
Scores input sequences
Compares against 1,200 known terminators from
Bacillus
subtilitis
and
Escherichia coli
RNAMotif
Used descriptors to find possible terminators
Scores free energy of hairpin formationSlide48
Matching Sequences
BioBIKE
/
PhAnToMe
Extracted the 50 nucleotides following every gene
Python
Compared sequences to terminators
Calculated distance to terminator
ARNold
3248 possible terminators
BioBIKE
5341 downstream sequences
Python
126 terminators
CAGGACGGTTTACCGGGGAGCCATAAACGGCTCCCTTTTCATTGTTATCA ACGGTTTACCGGGGAGCCATAAACGGCTCCCTTTTCATTGTTAdownstream sequenceterminatorSlide49Slide50Slide51Slide52
Conclusion
Appear to exhibit some degree of positional preference
Reasons remain unclear
Further studies:
Length of terminator
Function of operonsSlide53
References
Chen, Ying-
Ja
et al. “Characterization of 582 Natural and Synthetic Terminators and Quantification of Their Design Constraints.”
Nature methods
10.7 (2013): 659–64. Web. 20 Mar. 2014.
Ermolaeva
, M D et al. “Prediction of Transcription Terminators in Bacterial Genomes.”
Journal of molecular biology
301.1 (2000): 27–33. Web. 4 Apr. 2014.
Kingsford, Carleton L,
Kunmi
Ayanbule
, and Steven L Salzberg. “Rapid, Accurate, Computational Discovery of Rho-Independent Transcription Terminators Illuminates Their Relationship to DNA Uptake.” Genome biology 8.2 (2007): R22. Web. 17 Apr. 2014.Lai, Fu-Jou et al. “Identifying Functional Transcription Factor Binding Sites in Yeast by Considering Their Positional Preference in the Promoters.” PloS one 8.12 (2013): e83791. Web. 10 Apr. 2014.Lau, Lester F et al. “A Potential Stem-Oop Structure and the Sequence CAAUCAA in the Transcript Are Insufficient to Signal Q-Dependent Transcription Termination at XtR1.” 12.2 (1984): 1287–1299. Print.Macke, T J et al. “RNAMotif, an RNA Secondary Structure Definition and Search Algorithm.” Nucleic Acids Research 29.22 (2001): 4724–35.Mooney, Rachel Anne, and Robert Landick. “Building a Better Stop Sign: Understanding the Signals That Terminate Transcription.” Nature Methods 10.7 (2013): 618–619. Web. 21 Mar. 2014.Naville, Magali et al. “ARNold: A Web Tool for the Prediction of Rho-Independent Transcription Terminators.” RNA Biology 8.1 (2011): 11–13. Web. 8 Apr. 2014.Slide54
Resemblances and differences between promoter sequences in
E. coli
and
S.
enterica
Liam LewisSlide55
Inspiration
Novel sequence-based method for identifying transcription factor binding sites in prokaryotic genomes
Results found promoters with high probability Slide56
Background of Promoter sequences
Regulatory Elements
-35 and -10 consensus sequence
Sigma factor + RNA Polymerase Slide57
Program used to identify promoters
PePPER
Uses PSSMs and Hidden
markov
Models
Algorithm is universal for prokaryotesSlide58
Biobike implementation
Biobike
to compare both outputs from
PePPER
.Slide59
What’s next?
Comparison of results
Biobike
algorithm to accurately predict promotersSlide60
Comparison of Repressor-Operator Sequences in Lambda and other Temperate Phages
Shahroze AbbasSlide61
Repressor Sequences in Lambda
Two possible life cycles, dependent upon either Lambda repressor or
Cro
repressor.
cI
repressor maintains lysogenic state
Cro
repressor initiates a switch to the lytic state
Significance of
intergenic
sequences and neighboring genes to determine ‘hypothetical proteins’ in other organisms similarSlide62
Comparison of Repressor Sequence
Lambda repressor sequence tested for occurrence in other phages
Enterobacteria
phage
Sfl
Enterobacteria
phage HK244
Enterobacteria
phage HK542
Enterobacteria
phage HK544
Enterobacteria
phage HK 106
Enterobacteria
phage CL707Slide63
Still to come…
Analysis of operator sequences
Comparison of
cro
repressor in other phages
Trend or pattern to determine function of neighboring proteins in other phages
Trend or pattern in
sequences between phages