PPT-RECREATION

analysis AN ON questions THE What do c itizens want What are the m arket trends What is t he potential citizens THE s urvey development a survey was created that addressed citizen. Funding Services. Information Session. Chris Burden – Senior Funding Consultant. Agenda. What funding is available?. Active Club Program (ACP). Community Recreation and Sports Facility Program (CRSFP). The following presentation is a repeat of the presentation given at the 17. th. Annual CTRA conference.. BCTRA Teleconference . December 4. th. 2013. Therapeutic Recreation and Chronic Disease. . Chapter 20. HPR 453. Houle. (1980) included legal support as a distinct characteristic of a profession. Skalko. (1998) contends that the TR profession must work to influence public policy and healthcare regulation. Delivery. Dr Emma Sherry. Centre for Sport and Social Impact. . . . emmaesherry. ”Sport and recreation CAN change the world” . … can’t it?. Social Exclusion / Inclusion. Recreation or sport . Briefing with Mayor Brian Bowman. November 3, 2015. Agenda. . Introductions. Understanding the problem. Who is the South Winnipeg Action Team?. Developing a showcase recreation campus as part of an integrated plan for South Winnipeg. Golf Operations Division. Park and Recreation. Golf Operations Business Plan Review Process. Annual Updates. Municipal . Golf . Committee. Park . and Recreation . Board . Every 3 years. Environment Committee. Francis Marion National Forest. Francis Marion National Forest. 265,000 acres. Recreation. The Forest is a popular destination for a wide range of recreational visitors. There are more opportunities to enjoy both dispersed and developed recreational activities…. AND VISITOR SERVICES . Evaluating Potential RMAs. How would you go about evaluating potential RMAs?. PLANNING FOR. RECREATION . AND VISITOR SERVICES . Evaluating Potential RMAs. Consider an area’s eligibility and manageability before . . Past: How did recreation emerge along the Millrace? What did people do? Who participated? What’s the societal context? . Present: Why did it decline? Do people still use it and how?. Future: Who wins & who loses? Where does money come from? And Other considerations? . Outdoor recreation level of service analysis & recommendations discussion . Technical advisory committee (TAC) Meeting 3 – September 11, 2018. Project timeline. 2. Presentation agenda . Summary of key findings of statewide focus groups and survey results. Recreation Division. Recreation Programs Structure. Division Staff. Where Are Our Programs Held?. Where Are Our Programs Held?. Operate as an Enterprise Fund. All revenues are realized through: . Program Fees. Meeting Heldby Teleconference This meeting was held remotely using the City of San Diego Public Meetings YouTube channel : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4gY2k1D1ikzb25QMO3eg NO nnrnnnrnnnnnnnnnnnnnnrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrnnnnnn -/0---0-1-0/2---/3/45333152-21/-0-1-6/0144-6/27621-7-- twdimensional metatheoretical plane proposed selected recreation communication theories are located it and functional are made among eight disparate theories Communication theories have miscommunicati