/
Raj Raj

Raj - PowerPoint Presentation

mitsue-stanley
mitsue-stanley . @mitsue-stanley
Follow
380 views
Uploaded On 2016-11-06

Raj - PPT Presentation

Gnanaiah CPsychol AFBPsS Intensive Support Team Manager The importance of staff a ttitudes beliefs amp perspectives in managing c hallenging b ehaviour Mind ID: 485162

behaviour staff service training staff behaviour training service beliefs attitudes challenging perception support users amp perceptions response emotional user

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Raj" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Raj Gnanaiah

CPsychol AFBPsS

Intensive Support Team Manager

The importance of staff attitudes, beliefs & perspectives in managing challenging behaviour

Mind The Gap

Chartered Psychologist

BA, BSc (Hons), MSc, Post MSc

Complex Interaction: Bristol

2013Slide2

2. It is the attitudes, beliefs and perceptions leading up to CB

malpractice that are often not investigated. Key Messages:

1. Most post scandal reports focus on regulation, inspection, quality or an organization’s culture, inadequate training, instead of looking at the processes involved in the management of Challenging behaviour (CB).

3. Training is often seen as a solution to problems and the need to modify staff attitudes, beliefs and perception about CB are being ignored.

Some Gaps in our Practices here!4. Inevitably, beliefs and attitudes of others will directly effect the decisions made forthe service users. Slide3

2. What is the research evidence?

1. Effects of staff attitudes, beliefs and perception on challenging behaviour (CB).

3. Does training modify staff attitudes, beliefs and perception, if so what is the research evidence?

Overview:Recommendations: 1. Use of psychometric tools before and after CB training to examine staff competencies.

2. Staff training must encourage reflective practice to asses any blind spots linked to their own attitudes, beliefs and perceptions. 4. Best practices for training. Slide4

What

are attitudes?

Definition:Staff who understand their own motives for working with people who challenge services, are less likely to to be cynical and pessimistic

about providing support. … “a settled way of thinking or feeling about something a ,or a position of the body indicating a particular mental state” Oxford Dictionary

Unacceptable behaviour is often determined by the staff’s own personal standards and values which are open to interpretation. Behaviour occurs as a result of interaction with people. Slide5

What are beliefs & values?

“…one’s principles or standard, one’s judgment

of what is valuable in life” Oxford DictionaryOur values are a kind of learned belief

i.e. what is important to us.We learn them from our culture, family upbringing, religion, education, social environment and experiences. Our values are evidenced by our attitudes.

We use our beliefs to interpret other’s behaviour.Therefore it has an impact on how we see and define behaviour in general.

We tend to make close associations with like minded people and the opposite is true when there is a mismatch.

“Belief gets in the way of learning.” ― Robert A. Heinlein

Definition:Slide6

What is perception?

“…a way of seeing or understanding things”

We all see the world around us very differently.Perception is as a result of complex interaction with internal and external factors.

We generally accept our perception as a true representation of reality although sometimes this may not be true. “Man

is always inclined to be intolerant towards the thing, or person, he hasn't taken the time adequately to understand”Robert R. Brown Definition:Slide7

Not everything is what it seems

!

Image missingSlide8

Staff response to CB

Wiener Model: (1980, 1993)

Staff response to the CB depended upon the degree of control that a service user had over itFor example: Hasting &

Remmington (1994) Staff exhibited negative emotions and became less helpful when they attributed the CB to be within the service user’s control and..

…became more sympathetic and helpful, if they attributed the CB to be outside the service user’s control. Implications: Staff responses are based on their interpretation of CB.

(Dagnan, Trower and Smith, 1998; Hill and

Dagnan, 2002; Stanley and Standon, 2000; McGuinness and

Dagnan, 2001) Slide9

Further research evidence

Heyman et al (1998) studied -

How staff construct their perception of Challenging behaviour.Staff response:

Staff rarely cited their behaviour, or the action of the service, for causing the CBStaff communicated their interpretation of CB and its potential risk to other staff, thus creating self fulfilling prophecies and

making the situation even worse.Slide10

Interactive causes of CB

Snow et al: 2007: argued staff response to CB may be mediated by

their beliefs and perceptions and emotional response. For example: To determine socially acceptable behaviour. Weigel et al. (2006)

: if there is a low expressed emotion used by staff when talking about CB, then they are more likely to perceive the cause of the CB as external to the service user and not in control of the service user. The opposite is true when it is high expressed emotions.

Staff response when interviewed:“I can run around at home and slam doors and kick things, and that is all right. But if someone with learning difficulties does that it is, “Oh my god, they are expressing all these challenging behaviours”.” (Heyman et al., 1998, pp. 170)

Jahoda and Wanless,

2005: reported that if staff were unable to talk about their perceptions of the behaviour, they became increasingly resentful of the service users. Slide11

Impact of CB on staff attitudes,

beliefs and perceptions

Oliver (1995): reported when staff rewarded service users to stop self-harm, they were in fact reinforcing the maintenance of the behaviour. (

Mutual reinforcement) Hasting (2002): proposed that CB elicits negative emotional reactions of staff which impacts on their well being (stress & burnout), which influences the service in turn.

Hasting also found a robust relationship between CB, staff emotional reaction and staff behaviour. Other related variables were: Staff beliefs, staff psychological resources and organizational culture. Slide12

Staff perception of CB

Hasting (1997): Staff are more concerned about reducing the

challenging behaviour than understanding it. Johoda & Wanless (

2005): Staff hold more than one perspective about a person’s behaviour. Bromley & Emerson (1995): Staff indicated having a complex nature of relationship with the service user and inconsistencies in their interactions.

Staff believed that they had very little control over the causes of CB.Markham and Trower (2003): reported a link between the diagnostic label given to a service user and how staff interacted with them.Slide13

Staff level of experience and CB

Hastings, Remington, and Hopper (1995): Study -

Explored different beliefs to determine the causes of CB amongst experienced and inexperienced staff:

Experienced staff attributed the role of biological factors to determine CB, whereas inexperienced staff attributed emotional and environmental factors.Hastings, Reed, and Watts (1997): found significant differences between staff groups.

However, Wanless and Jahoda (2002): found younger staff negatively evaluating the service user’s who exhibited physical and verbal aggression to a greater degree than the older staff.

In contrast – Elgie and Hastings (2002) found no relation between experience

/ training variables. Slide14

Relationship between staff views, emotional reaction and willingness to help

Wanless and Jahoda (2002

) : negative appraisal of service users were associated with strong negative emotions of the staff.

Dagnan et al. (1998): and Rose and Rose (2005): staff’s negative emotions were correlated with lower of optimism in changing CB.

…and concluded correlation between lower level of optimism and less willingness to help. Dagnan and Cairns (2005): intention to help was positively correlated with responsibility of

change and sympathyRose and Rose:

stated that reduced staff optimism was related to global attributions of CBSlide15

Does training modify staff attitudes,

perception, and beliefs?

(Grey et al. 2007): provides general oberservation from the last 10-15 years that some part of the training

does include how staff feel about challenging behaviour.

However, its effectiveness is still unclearThere is no research evidence to link organizational training culture and staff gaining CB competencies.

‘Typical training approach’ is not sufficient to address staff beliefs about CB

Gallivan. A. 2011: reported that one day staff training delivering principles of Positive Behavioural Support had a significant change in staff attitude towards CB.(A.B.O.U. T).

The present CB management training has

little effect on

staff

attributions

.Slide16

Best Practice

Staff training and support

should take into account the cognitive (thoughts)

and emotional responses of staff to the challenging behaviour. (e.g., Kushlick et al., 1997).

A.B.O.U.T Challenging Behaviour One day trainingA : Attitude

B: Behaviour

O: ObservationU

: UnderstandingT

: Techniques

An example:

Gallivan

. A.

(2011)

Requires refresher

Regular refresher training to update previously held beliefs, in line with the

changing

needs of the servicer users. Slide17

In Real Life Options

My primary role as an Intensive Support Team Manager is to examine staff interaction with service users whose behaviour challenge services.

We take a holistic approach to training.

The Intensive Support Team (IST) takes a lead in making things happen:IST consists of a Speech and Language therapist, a Psychologist, a Dietician, and two

Learning and Developmental Officers including external specialist training providers. We deliver : Positive Behavioral Support, Active Support with the clear emphasis on modifying staff beliefs, attitudes and perceptions.

Communication training for enhancing staff’s understanding of service users’ behaviour

.Dietetic input: Improving food and mood of the service users.

Training to suit services.Slide18

Conclusion

Campbell and Hogg’s (2008): findings

suggest that the more training staff have, the more effective it is at challenging their previous understanding of behaviour. (Refresher - ongoing)

Consistent approach to CB is crucial: Using an evidence based model such as Positive Behavioral Support rather than depending upon experience. The importance of a supportive managerial culture where staff are able to freely express their views

about challenging behaviour and find an alternative way of working. Use psychometric tools to screen ‘best fit’ staff to work within CB services. A mechanism to support staff when they are facing stress and feeling disorientated.

Modifying staff perception about CB

should result in positive interactions and offer a good quality of life for the service users, thus addressing the gap in the practice. Slide19

Thanks for listening

“Just because we don't understand doesn't mean

that the explanation doesn't exist.” Madeleine L Engle

Related Contents


Next Show more