/
CAPITALIZATION OF EXPERIENCES CAPITALIZATION OF EXPERIENCES

CAPITALIZATION OF EXPERIENCES - PowerPoint Presentation

morgan
morgan . @morgan
Follow
65 views
Uploaded On 2023-11-11

CAPITALIZATION OF EXPERIENCES - PPT Presentation

USING THE RESULTS March 2017 USING THE RESULTS A link to the main aim of generating change Acknowledge the difference between adoption adaptation and scaling up Identify the factors behind this use ID: 1031044

innovation clear time degree clear innovation degree time results resources economic local inputs terms social work external change advantages

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "CAPITALIZATION OF EXPERIENCES" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1. CAPITALIZATION OF EXPERIENCES USING THE RESULTS March 2017

2. “USING” THE RESULTSA link to the main aim of generating changeAcknowledge the difference between adoption, adaptation and scaling upIdentify the factors behind this use

3. WHY IS IT IMPORTANT?Photo credit: CIFORMany (recurrent) problemsLimited number of beneficiaries“Islands of success”Knowledge “sits in libraries”New challengesDiffusion does not work

4. A SPECTRUM OF CHANGEAdaptationNot a recipeModifications according to contextAdoptionAwarenessInterestEvaluation TrialAdoption / use12Scaling up3

5. ADOPTIONRelative advantageCompatibilityTrialabilityComplexityObservabilityEconomic feasibilityProperty rightsSocial acceptability

6. RELATIVE ADVANTAGEThe degree to which an approach is seen as better than the approach it will replace May be expressed in terms of economic gain (i.e. it allows goals to be achieved at a lower cost) in time which can be saved, or in terms of fewer risks

7. COMPATIBILITYThe degree to which an innovation is consistent with the local values, objectives, tools, technologies, and the contextDoes it respond to a clear need?Does it match other activities in terms of time, resources, or people involved?

8. COMPLEXITYDoes it build on existing knowledge?The quantity and quality of inputs neededThe degree to which an innovation can easily be understood

9. TRIALABILITYThe ease with which an innovation can be testedThe possibility of seeing the results it brings relatively soon (where “seeing is believing”)Availability of time / resources needed

10. OBSERVABILITYThe degree to which results (or the expected advantages) are visibleLinked to speed: the faster the results are visible, the easier it can be to convince colleagues

11. ECONOMIC FEASIBILITYThe economic implications of incorporating a new technologyThe opportunity costsThe necessary investment or transaction costs The maintenance costs

12. SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITYDegree of match with the social and cultural normsNeeds and expectations, local demandThe need for a specific implementation setup: a hierarchical structure, different roles and responsibilitiesLocal traditions

13. OPEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTSIs there an “owner”?Need to acknowledge participantsNeed to pay fees or royalties

14. Diffusion does not work while you sleepMORE THAN THE INNOVATION ITSELF

15. EXTERNAL FACTORSRegulations Norms and valuesA clear demandInformation

16. INTERNAL FACTORSYour own capacity to innovateRoles and responsibilitiesPlans and timeframesManagers and championsInternal hierarchies

17. ADAPTATIONMany factors involved: GeographyResourcesNorms and traditionsNo recipe, nor a one-size-fits-all solution12Modifications in time and space3

18. simple;responds to the local settings;supports learning and the exchange of information;links issues of local concern with the wider context;can find the necessary inputs or markets; and receives the support they need. SCALING UPDifferent options or modelsA case’s replicability indexConditions / factorsA wider geographical coverage (horizontal)More quick resultsMore equitable impactLonger lasting resultsInstitutional / policy change (vertical)DriversSpaces

19. DRIVERSLeadership and visionExternal catalystsAccountabilityIncentives

20. LEADERSHIP AND VISIONUnderstanding of the need for and advantages of changeMotivation, inspiration and exampleA champion A clear idea of the intended situation

21. EXTERNAL CATALYSTSPressure from outsidersEvents or situations that precipitate changeNatural disasters, economic shocks, political or social unrest

22. INCENTIVESEconomic benefits (tax discounts), subsidiesInformationRewards, competitions, prizesOwnership rights

23. ACCOUNTABILITYRegular monitoring and evaluationsPeer reviewsVisibility, transparencyGuarantees against “elite capture”

24. SPACESLegal / policyAccess to marketInstitutional capacitiesFinancial resourcesPartnerships

25. LEGAL / POLICYFinancial regulationsLand ownership systemsRegional or national legal frameworksAdministrative processes

26. MARKETPrice expectationsLower levels of riskDemand for the products or services offeredAdequate and timely access

27. INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITIESProcesses, structures, internal; organizationIncentives and motivationHuman resources and skillsSufficient inputs and other resources

28. PARTNERSHIPSAdditional skills and resourcesSpecific expertiseEffective distribution of roles and responsibilitiesPossibility to exchange information or ideas

29. FINANCIAL RESOURCESCost reduction, economies of scaleLong lasting commitmentLocal fundsExternal funds, donors

30. LARGE SCALE CHANGE

31. An ACTION PLAN that focuses onThe drivers and spaces, and the context in general The innovation itself, and the main lessons learnt12Advocacy3

32. ADVOCACYAwareness raisingCommunicationCampaignsPartnershipsNew rules and regulations

33. ADVOCACYIdentification of key decision making stakeholdersGeneration / provision of evidenceA clear goal; a clear strategyInvolvement of key personsMultiple tools / products / channels

34. “We thought of considering some credibility criteria…”RAISING AWARENESS

35.