PPT-Debating

skills What is debating Definition a formal discussion on a particular topic in a public meeting or legislative assembly Debating Why is debating. Strong Weak Aver Strong Weak Aver Strong Weak Aver Strong Analysis Material Delivery Rebuttal Organization Debate Skills Please check that you have evaluated each debater in every category Comments First Affirmative First Negative Second Affirmat To some people debating is just a game in which one side tries to win an argument by outwitting out acting or simply outshouting the other To others it is just an academic exercise in futility involving pedantic semantic hairsplitting But to us deba Debating the Wisdom and Foolhardiness of the Hit-and-Run By Stuart Miller The New York Times June 2, 2012 “When I played in the sandlot, we emulated the guys we saw doing the hit-and-run,” Debating and producing ideasPromoting ideas and thoughts with decision makers and the general publicEncouraging the creation of projects and new collaborations Ehey signaled A decade later, the conc Debating. Debating. How. . to. Start. Bewertung. schriftliche Leistungsmessung. Global. Studies. 1. . How. . to. Start. Lecture. 1:. introduction. . to. . debating. Lecture. 2:. arguments. . Debate is an analytical process. It is persuasion through reasoning. Aristotle named 3 kinds of persuasive appeals: Allows your audience to track the interaction between the debaters. 4 minutes P resumes the thinking processabout the orderof capitalism within Why should you debate. It’s really interesting. You get to rigorously discuss engaging and challenging ideas. You explore viewpoints other than your own. This will cover sociology, politics, economics, philosophy, gender, IR, law….. The plan for today. Short introduction to the British Parliamentary debating . format. Split off into groups of eight. Have a 3-5 minute speech debate. Feedback from judges . Casual drinks at the Dirty Duck. Debating the Wisdom and Foolhardiness of the Hit-and-Run By Stuart Miller The New York Times June 2, 2012 “When I played in the sandlot, we emulated the guys we saw doing the hit-and-run,” Or why you shouldn’t be scared of debating…. What is debating?. Competitive debating is a fun activity akin to a game in which we examine ideas and policies with the aim of persuading people within an organised structure. It allows us to consider the world around us by thinking about different arguments, engaging with opposing views and speaking strategically.. Why Debate?. I. mprove . valuable skills (e.g. public speaking, critical thinking) that are applicable to many areas of our professional/personal lives. increase knowledgebase in various topics. The thrill of debating!. Unit 7 Section 3. Debating the Constitution. Americans debated whether or not to ratify, or approve, the Constitution. Many states insisted that a bill of rights be added. In the end, the Constitution was ratified and it included the Bill of Rights. The Constitution has successfully served as our framework of government for more than 200 years.. Stem cell research is headline news. Researchers are eager to move forward, state governments and private foundations are rushing to support it, and the sick and afflicted are desperate for its benefits. Yet powerful forces in our society — led by President George W. Bush — find it morally troubling and they are doing all in their powers to restrict its development beyond a very limited scale.Stem cells, which have the remarkable potential to develop into different parts of the body, are actually harvested from aborted fetal tissue or newly fertilized cells. Proponents of stem cell research argue that scientists are making legitimate use of already aborted fetuses and it is unfair to deprive those who are suffering the benefits of a potentially revolutionary therapy. Yet this practice has raised sharp criticisms from the Religious Right, who charge that science is capitalizing on an abhorrent procedure. Given the medical potential for treatment of incurable diseases by stem cell research, as well as the moral dilemmas this technology poses, should such research be permitted? What moral, religious, or political objections might be raised?Philosophers Michael Ruse and Christopher A. Pynes have compiled this valuable, up-to-date, and newly revised collection of articles by noted experts to address all aspects of the stem cell controversy. The contributors — scientists, medical practitioners, philosophers, theologians, historians, and policy analysts — offer a variety of perspectives to give readers the critical tools they need to shape an informed position on the topic. Readers will come away with a deeper understanding of the science of stem cell research, its medical cures and promises, and the moral, religious, and policy concerns surrounding this controversial social issue.