PPT-Debating Rights:

Author : ellena-manuel | Published Date : 2017-06-30

An exercise in student rights Lynne Coyne Capitol Debate Consequentialist weighing the consequences of our actions An action is morally right if the consequences

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Debating Rights:" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Debating Rights:: Transcript


An exercise in student rights Lynne Coyne Capitol Debate Consequentialist weighing the consequences of our actions An action is morally right if the consequences of that action are . Debating the Wisdom and Foolhardiness of the Hit-and-Run By Stuart Miller The New York Times June 2, 2012 “When I played in the sandlot, we emulated the guys we saw doing the hit-and-run,” [Case Study 8]. . Dr. G – Bioethical Issues @ the Beginning of Life. Mary Padberg, Ian . Lesuik. , Alex . Veno. , & Cassandra Coleman. May 16, 2013. We will be looking at and discussing the ethical and biomedical aspects of both Embryonic and Adult Stem Cells.. Debating. Debating. How. . to. Start. Bewertung. schriftliche Leistungsmessung. Global. Studies. 1. . How. . to. Start. Lecture. 1:. introduction. . to. . debating. Lecture. 2:. arguments. . What’s the deal?. 3v3 . Affirmative team and Negative team. 30 minutes prep. Each team comes up with arguments to support or oppose the motion and rebuttal. Each speaker speaks for 6-8 minutes, alternating between affirmative and negative. The Ellis Island Era. By: Mary Johnson & Debbie McDonald. http://herb.ashp.cuny.edu/items/show/1862. Who is he?. Where is he from?. Where might he be going?. What are his motivations for coming to the U.S.A.?. Nuclear Proliferation in the 21. st. Century. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=. dDTBnsqxZ3k. Part 1: Debating International Relations. What are we talking about?. The “fiction” of the nation-state. 2011 - 12 Society Introductory Guide to Debating Table of Contents Cambridge Schools 2011 - 12………………………………… NGOs’ divergent . roles. in . framing social . in/equity. Les . Levidow . Development . Policy and Practice, Open University . DSA conference, 1 November 2014. 'Green economy' context. The . 'green economy' agenda has been recasting or even displacing ‘sustainable development’ as the main global concept for debating feasible, desirable futures. . The plan for today. Short introduction to the British Parliamentary debating . format. Split off into groups of eight. Have a 3-5 minute speech debate. Feedback from judges . Casual drinks at the Dirty Duck. Chris Bisset. ACTDU Workshop 2015. Session 1: 9:15am-10:00am (45mins). Re-thinking debating. Constructing Arguments. (Trivia & Morning Tea). Session 2: 11:00am-11:45am (45mins). Preparing for debates. Training, . 12/10/2011. Warwick Debating Society. Proudly sponsored by. The basics. What is rebuttal? . Rebuttal is responding to the arguments of the other side, and explaining why they are wrong. When you make an argument you are explaining why the audience should agree with your side, but when you make rebuttal you are explaining why the audience should not agree with the arguments of the other side. . Training Session 25.11.2015. Plan for today. Types of IR motions. How to approach IR debates. Arguing for rights of states. A bit about interventions. Role of facts. Language to uses. Good practice in international relations debates. Or why you shouldn’t be scared of debating…. What is debating?. Competitive debating is a fun activity akin to a game in which we examine ideas and policies with the aim of persuading people within an organised structure. It allows us to consider the world around us by thinking about different arguments, engaging with opposing views and speaking strategically.. Why Debate?. I. mprove . valuable skills (e.g. public speaking, critical thinking) that are applicable to many areas of our professional/personal lives. increase knowledgebase in various topics. The thrill of debating!.

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Debating Rights:"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents