/
The National DNAR Policy The National DNAR Policy

The National DNAR Policy - PowerPoint Presentation

natalia-silvester
natalia-silvester . @natalia-silvester
Follow
450 views
Uploaded On 2017-01-23

The National DNAR Policy - PPT Presentation

Benefits and Hazards Shaun OKeeffe Galway University Hospital Burdensome treatment and undignified death Enough or Too Much Fail to provide adequate care I knew CPR wouldnt save our marriage but I had to try ID: 513043

dnar cpr care decision cpr dnar decision care patients patient medical communication family individual decisions service good death advance

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The National DNAR Policy" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

The National DNAR PolicyBenefits and Hazards

Shaun O’Keeffe

Galway University HospitalSlide2

Burdensome treatment and undignified death

Enough or Too Much?

Fail to provide adequate careSlide3

“I knew CPR wouldn’t save our marriage, but I had to try” Slide4

DNAR in UCHG(McNamee & O’Keeffe IJMS 2004)

Seventeen (3.5%) of 485 patients

(= 35.4% of the 48 patients close to death) were

identified as not for resuscitation. Written confirmation of the DNR order in the nursing notes for 14 (82%) and in the medical notes for 15 (88%) patients; In two cases, it was reported that doctors were reluctant to write down the agreed decision. Discussion with patient (2), family (10) or both (1) was recorded in 14 cases.Slide5

CPR in Irish Long-Stay UnitsO’Brien & O’Keeffe (

Ir

J Med

Sci 2009)16% of residents die each yearCPR ever in 40%, advanced CPR in 10%Policy in 55%, written in 13%IncludeAll residents for CPRNone for CPR unless pt/ family requestNobody over 80 years for CPRCPR only for staff and visitorsSlide6
Slide7
Slide8

General principlesPresumption in favour of providing CPRNeed for individual decision making – balance the benefits and risks

Involving the individual in discussions regarding CPR

Respecting an individual’s refusal of CPRSlide9
Slide10

Need to consider CPR and DNAR ?Cardiorespiratory arrest is considered unlikely: ‘..general presumption in favour of CPR… However, if an individual indicates that he/she wishes to discuss CPR, then this should be respected. Also, the wishes of individuals with an advance care plan refusing CPR under specific circumstances should be respected if the directive is considered valid and applicable to the situation that has arisen

’.

Cardiorespiratory arrest is considered possible or likely

: ‘Advance care planning, including CPR/DNAR is often appropriate …and should occur in the context of a general discussion about the individual’s prognosis and the likelihood that CPR would be successful, as well as his/her values, concerns, expectations and goals of care’.Slide11

Cardiorespiratory arrest, as a terminal event, is considered inevitable [If] ‘death is considered to be imminent and unavoidable…cardiorespiratory arrest may represent the terminal event in their illness and the provision of CPR would not be clinically indicated…. In many cases, a sensitive but open discussion of end-of-life care will be possible in which individuals should be helped to understand the severity of their condition. However, it should be emphasised that this does not necessarily require explicit discussion of CPR or an ‘offer’ of CPR. Implementing a DNAR order for those close to death does not equate to “doing nothing”……’Slide12

Role of family or friends in discussions regarding CPR

If the individual wishes to have the support or involvement of others, such as family or friends, in decision making, this should be respected. If the individual is unable to participate in discussions due to illness or incapacity, those with a close, on-going, personal relationship with the individual may have insight into his/her preferences, wishes and beliefs. However, their role is not to make the final decision regarding CPR, but rather to help the healthcare professional to make the most appropriate decision.

Where CPR is judged inappropriate, it is good practice to inform those close to the patient, but there is no need to seek their ‘permission’ not to perform CPR in these circumstance. Slide13

Why the policy can’t solve it all!Applies to all HSE settings (community, long-stay, hospice, acute hospital) Cannot cover all situations that may arise

Documentation and dissemination issues

Health care professionals: need for interpretation, empathy, common sense, knowledge and communication skills

Patients, relatives, public: need for better awareness of limitations of medicineRegulators: need for flexibilitySlide14

Communication and Dissemination of DNAR DecisionsService providers should have systems in place to ensure that the fact that a DNAR decision has been made is readily available to staff (who may not always be familiar with the individual patient/ service user) to ensure that it is complied with in the event of an emergency.

Consider a form to be placed in a prominent position towards the front of the notes, noting, at a minimum:

that a DNAR decision has been made (or an advance care plan or directive is in place),

whether review is intended or not and referring those who require more information, to the date(s) (and perhaps chart volume) of the relevant medical notes or to the location of the advance care directive or plan. Slide15

Service providers should have systems in place to ensure that Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation decisions do not become ‘lost’, for example, if an in-patient stay is prolonged, if a new medical chart volume is opened or due to staff changes and turnover. Approaches that may be helpful include:Routine communication of DNAR decisions at handover or on transfer of care.Mechanisms to ensure that the ‘front form’ alerting staff to the existence of a DNAR decision and a copy of the primary documentation of DNAR decisions are photocopied to new medical chart volumes Slide16

Service providers should have systems in place to ensure that valid Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation decisions made in one setting are effectively communicated if the patient/ service user moves to another setting. If an indefinite DNAR order is made, it is important that this is communicated effectively across settings. This requires that those in settings other than that in which the original decision was originally made can be confident that it was a valid decision, that is one made, after appropriate consultation, by somebody with the requisite expertise or in the case of an advance directive or plan that it was made in a valid fashion by the person themselves. This would

…require

, at a minimum, information on who had made the decision, why and whether it was intended to have indefinite effect. Slide17

How it can go wrong?Spirit vs letter of policyObsession with forms and documentation

Automatic reviews

‘Do they have capacity?’

Power struggles‘I’m the decider!’Who’s the ‘next of kin’Mixing ethics and economicsSlide18

Age Concern (2000) and Ebrahim (BMJ 2000):Rampant ageism and disregard of criteria in use of DNR orders in NHS. Legislation required.

Soper (BMJ 2002):

‘An unmerciful end’

for dying patients driven by fear of litigation or of complaints by relatives "I knew she was dead, doctor, and I told them that she wouldn't have wanted them to try and revive her, but they asked if I had that in writing." Britain Slide19

Futility - ‘an ethical trump card’? No obligation to offer or to discuss futile treatment

BUT

What does futile mean?

Futile for whom? Many clinicians view futility the way one judge viewed pornography.They may not be able to define it, but they know it when they see it! Slide20

Are we good at predicting outcomes? Quantitative thresholds for futility are arbitrary Often involves probability: Chance of success rarely zero‘

Will he come off the ventilator this time

?’

’He’s one tough cookie. I’ve never seen anyone bounce back from an autopsy before’

.Slide21

Physicians’ futility judgements rely more on values and biases than on evidence (Curtis, JAMA 1995)Race, age, social class and cause of illness all influence

“Because of your age, I’m going to recommend doing nothing.”Slide22

Overestimation of BenefitsTV major source of public information

(Miller, Arch Int Med 1992)

‘’

’I’m afraid there is really very little I can do’Slide23

CPR on US medical television shows (Diem et al NEJM 1996)67% survival to discharge Prognosis of 24h+ coma in soap operas (Cassaret BMJ 2005)

Fifty seven (89%) patients recovered fully

On the day they regained consciousness, 86% had no cognitive deficit or residual disability Slide24

Very difficult to hold discussion with acutely ill patients ‘To hold vulnerable patients .. in the glare of autonomy, carefully explaining their bleak prognosis and insisting lawyer-like on a decision .. seems barbaric to many’

(Finucane JAGS 1999)

Bad news poorly processed and not remembered wellDenial—may lead to focus on trivial but controllable mattersFear of abandonment “withdrawing care”, “Stopping care.”Don’t understand medical situation

Pitfalls in Communication: Patient Slide25

Pitfalls in Communication: Physician Physician’s communication styles can

worsen misunderstanding

Use of medical language when need to discuss values, QOL

Jargon: “usually” “most of the time” “cannot rule out” “futile”Semantics: “everything done” “vegetable”Multiple voices of heath care teamGoals not clarified: what parties believe will be achieved by treatment or interventionDecision-making reduced to power struggle between patient and clinicianFailure to ask patient (early enough)!

Goold SD et al. Conflicts regarding decisions to limit treatment. JAMA 2000.Slide26

Low agreement between surrogate and patient preferences (e.g. Ouslander et al, Arch Intern Med 1989)Disagreement / ‘Daughter from California syndrome’

Older people want to be consulted themselves

Guilt

of family membersAsked to sign patient’s death warrantPhysicians ask that they take responsibility for medical decisionsIntrinsic family issuesConflict of interest

Pitfalls in Communication: Family Slide27

Good Ethics makes Good Economics?30% of hospital costs for 5% of patients who die that year

40% of costs of last year of life in the last month

Avoid ‘futile care’ and save ‘billions’?

An illusion (Emanuel & Emanuel, NEJM 1994)Humane care not cheapPotential savings overstatedA distraction and contaminant

‘Good news Mrs Jones - I think we got it all’Slide28
Slide29

O’Keeffe et al Eur J Med

1993

; Cotter et al Age Ageing 2008