/
Voluntary tax compliance Voluntary tax compliance

Voluntary tax compliance - PowerPoint Presentation

natalia-silvester
natalia-silvester . @natalia-silvester
Follow
401 views
Uploaded On 2016-10-10

Voluntary tax compliance - PPT Presentation

Cooperation between DIAN and Skatteverket Anders Stridh amp Lennart Wittberg 1 5 June 2015 Enforcement Malcolm K Sparrow There is a certain foolishness in traditional enforcement approaches They wait until the damage has been done and then they react case by case incident by in ID: 474094

enforcement norms effect social norms enforcement social effect compliance taxpayers deterrence behaviour favour personal audits audit thinking comply purpose

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Voluntary tax compliance" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Voluntary tax compliance

Cooperation between DIAN and Skatteverket

Anders Stridh

&

Lennart Wittberg, 1 – 5 June 2015Slide2

EnforcementSlide3

Malcolm K. Sparrow

There is a certain foolishness in traditional enforcement approaches. They wait until the damage has been done and then they react, case by case, incident by incident, failure by failure. Enforcement agencies accept the work in the form in which it arrives, and, therefore, have tended to organize their activities around failures rather than around opportunities for intervention.Slide4

How will the taxpayer behave after an audit?

Evade more?

Evade less?Slide5

Prospect Theory

Daniel Kahneman & Amos TverskyPeople are willing to take big risks in order to avoid losses

Ex: Choose between

Lose

1000 or

50/50-chans of losing 2000 or 0People are not willing to take big risks in order to gain moreEx: Choose between Win 1000 or 50/50-chans of winning 2000 or 0Tax refund: less tax evasion

Tax debt: more tax evasion

Risk of loosing the business: more tax evasion

This means:Slide6

Time

Evasion

One evading taxpayer

New evader

Little extra revenue

High preventive effect

”Old” evader

Much extra revenue

Low preventive effectSlide7

The German case

Taxpayers participating in the informal sector

Taxpayers that perceive a high risk of detection

Danish researchers have shown that risk of detection had no impact on taxpayer behaviour directly.

But, the tax morale (social norms) had improved.Slide8

Is deterrence

effective?Slide9

The purpose of audits is

NOT

To maximise revenue

To perform as many checks and audits as possible

The purpose is to increase the willingness to comply

in the long runSlide10

External pressure (incentives) can increase or decrease the individuals own moral convictions.

The moral conviction will

decrease

if the incentives are perceived to be

controlling

.The moral conviction will increase if the incentives are perceived to be supportive.Crowding theory, Bruno S FreySlide11

Slippery slope modelSlide12

Perceptions of power

Coercive power

Compliance

through

intimidation Legitimate powerCompliance through fairnessReduces the willingness to complyIncreases the willingness to complySlide13

Norms and deterrence

Social norms

Personal norms

Behaviour

Strong norms in favour of compliance

+

+

Low deterrent effect of enforcement

-

-

Michael Wenzel, 2002Slide14

Norms and deterrence

Weak norms in favour of compliance

-

-

High deterrent effect of enforcement

++

Social norms

Personal norms

BehaviourSlide15

Weak norms in favour of compliance

-

-

Higher

deterrent effect of enforcement

Strong norms in favour of compliance++

+

+

Norms and deterrence

Social norms

Personal norms

BehaviourSlide16

Stronger

norms in favour of compliance

+

+

Strong norms in favour of compliance

++

Low

deterrent effect of enforcement

-

-

Norms and deterrence

Social norms

Personal norms

BehaviourSlide17

Stronger

norms in favour of compliance

+

+

Strong norms in favour of compliance

++Norms and deterrence

To support social norms is the purpose of enforcement, not deterrence.

Social norms

Personal norms

BehaviourSlide18

Stärker

normer

för

att betala skatt++Strong norms in favour of compliance++

Norms and deterrence

Social norms:

What

others

do

What

others

think

Enforcement can influence this

To support social norms is the purpose of enforcement, not deterrence.

Social norms

Personal norms

BehaviourSlide19

What

happens if a person don’t

follow

his

personal norms?Feelings of shameVery big threat to self imageThe person needs to confirm that his actions is rightBy finding ways to rationalize

the

behaviour

By

doing

it

again

Can

lead

to change in personal normsSlide20

Trust

based

climate

Antagonistic

climate

Voluntary

compliance

Enforcement

contributes

to

trust

Coerced

compliance

Enforcement

destroys

trust

Builiding

trust and

fairness

Controlling

taxpayers

A strategic choice

Enforcement that support social norms and the willingness to comply

Enforcement used as deterrenceSlide21

Communication and enforcement

Is the purpose to intimidate…

…or to protect honest behaviour?

You must comply, or else…

We will make sure that others comply.Slide22

The

evolution

of

the

thinking

Selection for audit

Understand and influence behaviour

Right from the start

Fixing

the

taxpayer

Fixing

the

environment

Risk management

An important shiftSlide23

How do we perceive the taxpayers?

Are the taxpayers the problem?Slide24

The philosophical perspective

Who you are determines what you do

What you do determines who you are

“The

man who possesses character excellence does the right

thing”

“It’s

not who you are underneath, it’s what you do that defines

you”Slide25

The practical perspective

It is easier to change the environment than to change the person…

…regardless of what we might think of a persons characterSlide26

We

have always a choice – we

are

not

victims

We don’t chose this viewThey don't understandPeople are strange

We chose this

view

We have not explained well enough

We have not understood the needsSlide27

Its

not

about

manipulating

people

to

do

things

Its

about

working

with

people

towards

common

goals

Its about building trust and fairnessSlide28

We can influence the environment in many ways

Social norms

Most taxpayers are compliant

Most taxpayers want to comply

Simplify and automate

Integrated softwareEnforcement (not deterrence)About fairnessAbout social normsWe never use threatsIts about catching “those who evade”Slide29

General level

Other taxpayers

Individual level

Audited taxpayers

Audits have often a positive effect

Audits can have a negative effect on compliant taxpayers

Audits can have a positive effect on non-compliant taxpayers

Audits can have a negative effect on non-compliant taxpayersSlide30

The effect of audits depends on…

The selectionFollow-up audit can be a good idea

How

the audit is carried out

How

audit activities are reported in mediaSlide31

Proactive measures and support

Reassessments due to unnecessary errors

Combat tax evasion and crime

More

resources

Fewer

resources

More

resources

To just keep correcting taxpayer errors is not effectiveSlide32

”Old” evaders

4 different audit strategies

Create better general

preventive effect by

audit the “right” areas

(according to the public)

4

Create better indivual

preventive effect by

“follow-up” audits

3

New evaders

Stop new evaders

2

Catch big evaders

1Slide33

“For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple and wrong.”

H.L. MenckenSlide34
Slide35

Enforcement

Service

Other

circumstances

Number

of

errors

Type

of

errors

Size

of

errors

”The system”

The

resultSlide36
Slide37

Discussion

What is the purpose of enforcement in Colombia?Should the purpose be different?

What consequences does this have on how we choose goals and what we measure as success?Slide38

Strategic thinkingSlide39

What we intend to do

What we did

This is our view

This is what we doSlide40

A strategy requires a goalSlide41

Plans are nothing, planning is everything.

EisenhowerSlide42

Dynamic thinking is crucialSlide43

We

get stuck in familiar

patternsSlide44

Ways of thinking

InsightsSlide45
Slide46

Working with things or people

Predictable

Control

All cases exactly the same

Unpredictable

Difficult to control

Unique casesSlide47

Strategic thinking is about

Understanding the past and presentNot predicting the future but having an idea of the current direction and have foresight about the future

Thinking ahead

Thinking in abstracts and patterns

Collecting knowledge and gaining insights