PPT-Unit 2: Comparing Two Groups
Author : pamella-moone | Published Date : 2017-05-20
In Unit 1 we learned the basic process of statistical inference using tests and confidence intervals We did all this by focusing on a single proportion In Unit 2
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Unit 2: Comparing Two Groups" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Unit 2: Comparing Two Groups: Transcript
In Unit 1 we learned the basic process of statistical inference using tests and confidence intervals We did all this by focusing on a single proportion In Unit 2 we will take these ideas and extend them to comparing two groups We will compare two proportions two independent means and paired data. comment on comparing the size of the two footsteps. Without the drawing, the explanation would have been incomplete. Students C-E show their proof of answer without drawing on the rug. Student From Independent Samples. The Design. You have two or more groups.. One or more continuous predictors (C).. And one continuous outcome variable (Y).. You want to know if . Y = a + . b. 1. C. 1. + … + . Statistics. What you will learn. Be able to state the null and alternative hypotheses for testing the difference between two population proportions.. Know how to examine your data for violations of conditions that would make inference about the difference between the two population proportions unwise or invalid.. The Holocaust and Rwanda. Genocide. the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group. Examples: Holocaust, Rwanda, Armenians, Bosnia, Sudan. Concentration Camp for Bosnian Muslims and Croats. . 1) Learning Target: . To. . compare mixtures. . I can write . part-to-part. and . part-to-whole. . ratios. .. Homework. : . 1) . Complete . Notes on . pg. . 8 . of CS Inv. . 1 . by . watching the . CS INVESTIGATION . 2. : Comparing & Scaling . RATES. 2.1 . Sharing Pizza. . Learning Target: . I can determine whether two. ratios are equivalent . or find . which of the two is more favorable. Kroger Grocery Tour Objectives. Familiarize patients with . MyPlate. How to shop for healthy foods. How to save money. How to read a food label. Disclose a relevant relationship with . Krogers. as a . R. ational Numbers. TeacherTwins©2014. 2). Warm Up. Identify all sets to which each number belongs. . 1). . . 2). -45. 3). 3.76. 4). . 5). Simplify the following fraction: . . . Rational number. Unit 8 – Fitness Workbook Course book Unit 8 – Fitness 1 Write the activities under the correct pictures. roller- skate ride a bicycle swim ice-skate ski climb mountains run play basketball lift weights Jinxia. Ma. November 7, 2013. Contents. What are robust methods. Why robust methods. How to conduct the robust methods analysis. Apply robust analysis to your data. What are “robust methods”?. Robust statistics. Chapter 9. Review of Simulation-Based Tests. One proportion: . We created a null distribution by flipping a coin, rolling a die, or some computer simulation. . We then found where our sample proportion was in this null distribution.. P4 units at the . Akanani. prospect area, . Bushveld. Complex, South Africa: Combination of R-Cluster,. R-Factor and Discriminant analysis approach. Mandende. 1. , H., Siad. 2. , A.M., Bailie. 3. , R., Okujeni. Interactive Multiobjective Optimization Methods. Bekir Afsar. bekir.b.afsar@jyu.fi. University of Jyväskylä. Finland. 19.6.2023. Outline. Introduction. Systematic review of assessing interactive methods. LIST OF. . BARRIERS. Employment/Time. Work Restrictions/Family Commitments. Lack of Disposable Income . Accessibility of Facilities/Equipment . Lack of Role Models . Provision of Activities . Awareness of Activity Provision .
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Unit 2: Comparing Two Groups"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents