Chapter Six Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1
Slide2

Chapter Six

Individuals With Intellectual DisabilitiesSlide3

The AAIDD, founded in 1876, has amended its definition of mental retardation several times over the decades. In 1987, the American Association of Mental Deficiency (AAMD) changed its name to the American Association on Mental Retardation (AAMR). In 2007, the Association changed its name to the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD) which is consistent with European and Canadian terminology. The U.S. Department of Education uses the term mental retardation and both are used interchangeably in this textbookSlide4

Defining Intellectual Disability:

An Evolving Process

1961 AAIDD Definition

1973 AAIDD Definition

1983 AAIDD Definition

1992 AAIDD Definition2002 AAIDD Definition2010 AAIDD Definition

4Slide5

5Slide6

Defining Intellectual Disability

1961 AAIDD definition

“Subaverage general intellectual functioning which originates during the developmental period and is associated with impairments in adaptive behavior.”

1973 AAIDD definition

“Significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning existing concurrently with deficits in adaptive behavior, and manifested during the developmental period.

1983 AAIDD definition

“Significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning resulting in or associated with concurrent impairment in adaptive behavior and manifested during the developmental period.”

6Slide7

Defining Intellectual Disability

1992 AAIDD definition

“Significantly subaverage intellectual functioning, existing concurrently with related limitations in two or more of the following applicable adaptive skill areas: communication, self-care, home living, social skills, community use, self-direction, health and safety, functional academics, leisure, and work. Mental retardation manifests before age 18.”

It portrays intellectual disability as a relationship among three key elements: the individual, the environment, and the type of support required for maximum functioning in various settings.

It stresses functioning in one’s community rather than just focusing on the clinical aspect of the individual such as IQ score or adaptive behavior.

7Slide8

8Slide9

Defining Intellectual Disability

2002 AAIDD definition

“

Mental retardation is a disability characterized by significant limitations both in intellectual functioning and in adaptive behavior as expressed in conceptual, social, and practical adaptive skills. This disability originates before age 18.”

9Slide10

Defining Intellectual Disability

2002 AAIDD definition continued

Limitations

in present functioning must be considered within the context of community environments typical of the individual’s age, peers, and culture.

With

appropriate personalized supports over a sustained period, the life functioning of the person with an intellectual disability will generally improve. Slide11

Defining Intellectual Disability

2010 AAIDD definition

The term

mental retardation

is replaced by the more contemporary label,

intellectual disabilities.Developed by a committee of eighteen medical and legal scholars as well as policymakers, educators, and other professionals, the 2010 definition emphasizes the abilities and assets of individuals with intellectual disabilities rather than their deficits or limitations.

Intellectual disabilities are viewed as a state of functioning rather than an inherent trait. As in earlier definitions, one of the goals of the 2010 definition is to maximize support services so as to allow persons with intellectual disabilities to participate fully in all aspects of daily life.

11Slide12
Slide13

Assessing Intellectual Ability

Assessment tools:

Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (4th ed., WISC-IV)

Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (5

th

ed.)

Potential problems:

Potential for cultural biasFlexibility of IQ scores

Overemphasis on IQ score

13Slide14

Assessing Adaptive Behavior

Adaptive behavior is seen as “the degree to which, and the efficiency with which, the individual meets the standards of maturation, learning, personal independence, and/or social responsibility that are expected for his or her age level and cultural group.”

(Grossman, 1983, p. 11)

14Slide15

Assessing Adaptive Behavior

Considers the context of the individual’s environment and cultural

influences. Skill

areas in which most people participate: communication, self-care, home living, social skills, community use, self-direction, health and safety, functional academics, leisure, and work

Assessment Tools:

AAMR Adaptive Behavior Scale-School

AAMR Adaptive Behavior Scale-Residential and Community

AAIDD Diagnostic Adaptive Behavior Scale being developed

Slide16

Classification of Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities

Etiological perspective- consequence of disease processes or biological defects

Intellectual deficits- classification based on IQ score

Educational perspective- use of outdated terms to distinguish a children’s level of ability to learn academic or employment skills

Levels of supports- definitions have shifted to an emphasis on the level of supports that an individual needs rather than IQ score

16Slide17

17Slide18

18Slide19

Brief History of the Field

Early Civilizations

Early civilizations such as the Greek and Roman empires valued physical and mental strength and were reported to practice infanticide with children thought to be defective.

The Middle Ages

The social force of religion brought a more charitable view of disability into vogue and churches established asylums for the “children of God.” Fear and superstition were rampant and people with intellectual disabilities were often thought to possess demonic powers from Satan.

19Slide20

Early optimism (early nineteenth century)

Itard

and

Seguin (educators mid 1800’s )

brought European ideas to America regarding the education of people with intellectual disabilities. In 1876, the Association of Medical Officers of American Institutions for Idiotic and Feeble-minded Persons was establishedSlide21

Protection and pessimism (late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries)

This era witnessed the American development of large, isolated institutions designed to segregate people with intellectual disabilities. The understaffed institutions focused on custodial care rather than education and training. The deinstitutionalization movement began in the 1970s to move people with intellectual disabilities into the community.

Emergence of public education for students with intellectual disability

In the early part of the twentieth century, schools were developed for students with intellectual disability although they were often isolated and segregated. Classes were generally available to students who were considered higher functioning and did not provide services for students with severe intellectual disability. Legislation and professional opinion has shifted toward less restrictive and more integrated educational placements for students with intellectual disability.

 Slide22

Prevalence of Intellectual Disabilities

Over 431,000 students between the ages of 6-21 were identified as having intellectual disabilities during the 2011-2012 school year.

These students represent approximately 7% of all pupils with disabilities and less than 1% of the total school age population.

The

number of students identified as having intellectual disabilities has decreased over the years

.

Majority of those identified have mild intellectual disability

22Slide23

Etiology of Intellectual Disabilities

Prenatal (before birth)

Chromosomal, metabolic and nutritional disorders, maternal infections, environmental factors, unknown influences

Perinatal (during birth)

Gestational disorders, neonatal complications

Postnatal (after birth)

Infections and intoxicants, environmental factors

23Slide24

24Slide25

Prevention of Intellectual Disabilities

Prevention Levels:

Primary (before onset or occurrence)

Prenatal care, genetic testing, ultrasound

Secondary (reduce risk factors)

Newborn screeningTertiary (interventions)Aimed at maximizing the quality of life for a person with a disability

25Slide26

Characteristics of Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities

Learning Characteristics

-attention

-memory

-academic performance

-motivation -generalization

-language development

Social and BehavioralCharacteristics

-poor interpersonal skills

-socially appropriate

interactions -difficulty establishing and maintaining friendships

26Slide27

27Slide28

28Slide29

Educational Considerations

Functional academics/functional curriculum

Community-based instruction

Standards-based instruction

IEP teams must consider:

student and family preferences, student’s age and years left in school, rate of learning, current and future settings, other skill needs

29Slide30
Slide31

Effective Instructional Techniques

High

expectations

Task

analysis: A complex behavior or task is broken down and sequenced into steps

Cooperative learning: An instructional methods that places small groups of students together in order to jointly accomplish a common goalScaffolding: Support is given to a student learning a new task and the support is withdrawn as the student becomes more independent and no longer needs the support.Inclusion strategies: Modify instruction, materials, and assessments, teach organizational skills, monitor progress of all students, collaborate with families

31Slide32

Services for Young Children With Intellectual Disabilities

Early intervention can be defined as the services and supports rendered to children with disabilities or those who evidence risk factors, younger than age 3, and their families.

Early intervention represents a consortium of services—not just educational assistance but also health care, social services, family supports, and other benefits.

32Slide33

Transition Into Adulthood

Transition planning

Independent living

Employment

Sheltered workshop

Supported competitive employmentJob coach

33Slide34

Adults With Intellectual Disabilities

Integration in all aspects of daily life with nondisabled peers

Self-determination: decision-making capacity must be fostered

Self-advocacy: encourage people with intellectual disabilities to advocate for their own wants and needs

34Slide35

Family Issues

Families with a child with intellectual disabilities may experience a wide range of concerns and often rely on a support network made up of friends and family members in addition to parent organizations and professional groups.

35Slide36

Issues of Diversity

Overrepresentation of minority students in special education programs

Culturally biased assessment tools and practices

Teacher expectations

36Slide37

Technology and Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities

Computers

Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems

Self-operated prompting devices for daily activities and life skills

Content-area support

37Slide38

Trends, Issues, and Controversies

Genetic testing

Quality of life

Attitudinal changes

Technology and medical advances

Inclusive education

Increased self-advocacy and self-determination

38