Repeating the words of Henry Lamb httpswwwyoutubecomwatchvc7nTIJHXec How did We Get to where We are Today The progressive politicisation of Science which has resulted in the loss of Scientific Integrity all over the democratic world ID: 477665
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Dr Judy Ryan" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Dr Judy Ryan
Repeating the words of Henry Lamb
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7nTIJHX_ecSlide2
How did We Get to where We are Today?
The progressive politicisation of Science which has resulted in the loss of Scientific Integrity all over the democratic world.
Early atmospheric science where honest errors occurredLysenko the Russian agriculturist turned scientist who faked his genetic seed data in order to become Stalin’s darling ………but was eventually exposed and sent to the Gulag himself where he died. "Lysenkoism" is used metaphorically to describe the manipulation or distortion of the scientific process as a way to reach a predetermined conclusion as dictated by an ideological bias, often related to social or political objectives.
The Odum Brothers were regarded as prestigious scientists in the USA from around the 1930’s until they both died in 2002 They also faked their data to prove (not to test) that their hypothesis that Nature is in Equilibrium…the Gaia hypothesis was correct..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism
Fourier Lavoisier Langley Arrhenius
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2eagvn_all-watched-over-by-machines-of-loving-grace-2-3-the-use-and-abuse-of-vegetational-concepts-2011_autoSlide3
The Nature is in equilibrium theory, otherwise known as Gaia or “The Balance of Nature” was not only disproven but also discredited in the 1970s and was supposedly replaced by Chaos theory……but the Odum Brothers were never held accountable for their fakery………….
Chaos theory states that small differences in initial conditions (such as those due to rounding errors in numerical computation) yield widely diverging outcomes for dynamical systems such as weather and climate, rendering long-term prediction impossible in general.[2]
You only need to look at the 2009 Australian National Science Curriculum to realise that Gaia is alive and well and still being taught to Australian students. Chaos theory seems to have been quietly discardedThe evidence now indicates that some scientists at the Australian Bureau of Meteorology have faked their data. WHY? Lysenkoism" is used metaphorically to describe the manipulation or distortion of the scientific process as a way to reach a predetermined conclusion as dictated by an ideological bias, often related to social or political objectives
bit.ly/tgm-j
How did We Get to where We are
Today? Continued
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balance_of_natureSlide4
The Evidence indicates that the images in the LHS panel are system generated fake data
http://www.galileomovement.com.au/docs/jr/SystemGeneratedFakeData.pdfSlide5
The IAC’s review of the IPCC’s Assessment Report No 4
The term Climate Change is not a testable hypothesisThe term Carbon di-oxide is totally misused through the document. It is used in conjunction with the words, tax, price, energy intensity
For any geographic region, CO2 emissions are the product of population, GDP per capita, energy usage per dollar of GDP, and the carbon intensity of energy. http://bit.ly/1OYQMO9
population
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2010-09-10/29880
MY BRIEF WORD COUNT OF MISLEADING TERMINOLOGY
http://www.galileomovement.com.au/docs/jr/SatelliteObservationsOfGlobalCO2Levels.pdfSlide6
Summary Points
The IAC’s review of the IPCC’s AR4 was damning.
I agree. The terms ‘carbon’ and ‘emissions’ without their descriptor di-oxide are used consistently throughout the whole document. This is deception by omission.Our democracy is being systematically and progressively weakened by the UN, who are using this misleading terminology in an attempt to confuse and thus to rule us as an unelected government.The evidence shows that the IPCC, UNFCCC and the EPA are peopled and probably controlled by some White Collar Criminals.
Why is Australia fraternising with them?
Everything I say is evidence based. I merely articulate the results of my own independent research. If there is anything I have said that you think is incorrect pls let me know and I will investigate further and if shown to be incorrect, will correct it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Strong#2005_Oil-for- Food_scandal_and_hiring_practice_criticisms
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-13/sustainability-pioneer-sentenced-to-prison-over- asbestos.html
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/12/16/massive-fraud-at-the-epa-from-agencys-top-paid-climate-official/
http://bit.ly/1OYQMO9Slide7
Dr Judy Ryan
bit.ly/tgm-jVolunteer for
The Galileo MovementThank you for ListeningSlide8
http://www.galileomovement.com.au/docs/jr/Sun_and_C02.pdfSlide9
Climate Change, Having a bet either Way
The Seventies Global Cooling and its all our fault for emitting CO2The nineties to current time Global Warming and its all our fault for emitting CO2
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/1970s-ice-age-scare/
http://bit.ly/1Mi8PA0Slide10