PPT-Percolation & The Phase Transition

1 Bring your own Phase Diagram TIFR Mumbai India Dec 1314 2010 Brijesh K Srivastava Department of Physics West Lafayette IN USA 2 The general formulation of the percolation problem is concerned. etc. . [Closely following the text by R. . Zallen. ]. R. . Zallen. , . The Physics of Amorphous Solids. , Wiley-VCH, 2004.. This figure, from page 137 of . Zallen. , describes the problem in a 2D square mesh.. Sudhansu. S. . Mandal. IACS, Kolkata. HRI. 1. Anderson’s Theorem. Statement:. . Superconducting order parameter and hence superconducting transition temperature is independent of (weak) non-magnetic disorder.. Rajmohan Rajaraman. Northeastern University, Boston. May 2012. Chennai Network Optimization Workshop. Percolation Processes. 1. Outline. Branching processes. Idealized model of epidemic spread. Percolation theory. &. The Phase Transition . . . 1. Bring your own Phase Diagram. TIFR, Mumbai, India. Dec. 13-14, 2010. Brijesh. K . Srivastava. Department of Physics. West Lafayette, IN. VO2 – Nikita Butakov. Mott vs. Mott-Hubbard Transitions. Role of Lattice vs. Electronic Subsystems. Presence of intermediary phases. Trigger-dependent excitation pathways. Electron/hole doping. Heating. consequences on diffusion, properties . www.msm.cam.ac.uk. /phase-trans. The Pearlite Reaction. 1 µm. upper bainite. Sheaf is a rough object. plastic zone . hydrogen. f. ragmentation of . martensite. Dmitri Krioukov. CAIDA/UCSD. M. . . Á. . Serrano, M. . Bogu. ñá. . UNT, March 2011. Percolation. Percolation is one of the most fundamental and best-studied critical phenomena in nature. In networks: the critical parameter is often average degree . consequences on diffusion, properties . www.msm.cam.ac.uk. /phase-trans. The Pearlite Reaction. 1 µm. upper bainite. Sheaf is a rough object. plastic zone . hydrogen. f. ragmentation of . martensite. Overview. What are we doing?. Moving from Angel to Blackboard-Learn. Not an upgrade, big leap. “Automatic” to a standard (big shift). CMS to LMS. What it will do for us?. Increased teaching and learning options (building blocks/learning tools). transiton. Spontaneous symmetry breaking. Mermin. -. Wagner:. no continuous symmetry breaking in models . with short ranged interactions in dimension . less than two. Homotopy. group. Vortex free energy:. IV . – . Obligation. COMPLIANCE REVIEWS COMPLETED. PHASE IV TRANSITION. PHASE IV. PHASE III. PDMG. REVIEW. APPLICANT REVIEWS AND SIGNS PROJECT. FINAL REVIEW AND AWARD IN EMMIE. PDMG CONDUCTS RECOVERY TRANSITION MEETING. Mott vs. Mott-Hubbard Transitions. Role of Lattice vs. Electronic Subsystems. Presence of intermediary phases. Trigger-dependent excitation pathways. Electron/hole doping. Heating. Structural distortions. . [Closely following the text by R. . Zallen. ]. R. . Zallen. , . The Physics of Amorphous Solids. , Wiley-VCH, 2004.. This figure, from page 137 of . Zallen. , describes the problem in a 2D square mesh.. Zallen. ]. R. . Zallen. , . The Physics of Amorphous Solids. , Wiley-VCH, 2004.. This figure, from page 137 of . Zallen. , describes the problem in a 2D square mesh.. At some . precise. critical number of random snips, current flow stops..