/
Child Sexual Abuse: Overcoming Society’s Perceptions Child Sexual Abuse: Overcoming Society’s Perceptions

Child Sexual Abuse: Overcoming Society’s Perceptions - PowerPoint Presentation

phoebe-click
phoebe-click . @phoebe-click
Follow
388 views
Uploaded On 2017-05-25

Child Sexual Abuse: Overcoming Society’s Perceptions - PPT Presentation

Texas Association Against Sexual Assault Conference 2014 Reality Understanding society and what they think of these offenses Most do not believe or want to believe this is going on in their communities That those people they see on a daily basis could be abusing their kids ID: 551907

pediatrics children evidence sexual children pediatrics sexual evidence forensic 106 christian hrs child 2000 100 assault abuse findings body

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Child Sexual Abuse: Overcoming Society..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Child Sexual Abuse: Overcoming Society’s Perceptions

Texas Association Against Sexual Assault

Conference 2014Slide2

Reality

Understanding society and what they think of these offenses.

Most do not believe or want to believe this is going on in their communities. That those people they see on a daily basis could be abusing their kids.

If we accuse too early and then find it is not what happened what have we done to that innocent person and their future. Slide3

Goals

The truth: Being able to establish through a good thorough investigation whether the injuries were inflicted or caused by an accidental occurrence. Slide4

Welcome to Child Abuse

The victim waits to tell

There is rarely any scientific evidence

Often no one believes the victim

The victim loves the defendant

The victim has recanted

The victim is barely verbal

CPS and therapists are your new best friendsSlide5

Your Victims?Slide6

Your Victims?Slide7

Your Suspect?Slide8

Your Suspect?Slide9

What do YOU see…… Slide10

What is NORMAL….. Slide11

Reasons Sexually Abused children Present to medical care

Disclosure of sexual contact

Behavior changes

Medical complaintSlide12

Who would think this…..

Survey of Pediatric residency training programs in US

142/195 programs responded

Chief residents answered questions and reviewed anatomy diagramsSlide13

Dubow, et al. CAN 2005:195-205.

6

7

4

1

2

5

3

Physician Knowledge of Genital Anatomy

Take Home Points: Increased education, need for

experienced/trained specialists doing examinationsSlide14

Sexual ExposureSlide15

Purpose of the Medical Exam in suspected SA cases

Injury identification

Collect evidence

STD screening/treatment

Reassurance to child and parentsSlide16

Adams. Pediatrics 1994: 310-317

“Examination Findings in Legally Confirmed Child Sexual Abuse: It’s Normal to be Normal”

Study looked at 236 children (<17

yrs

)

All cases the perpetrator was convicted or pled guilty

Examination findings:

Normal 28%

Non-specific 49%

Suspicious 9%

Abusive 14%

Best predictor of abnormal findings :

Time since assault

History of bleeding

Slide17

Heger

, CAN 2002

2384 children; 5-year prospective study (1985-1990); tertiary CA referral center.

Children 3mo-14yo

Mean age 6.9

yrs

girls; 5.5

yrs boysDisclosing: 7.8yrsNon disclosing: 4.5 yrsSlide18

Conclusions

Heger CAN 2002

Only 4% of all children referred for medical evaluation of sexual abuse have abnormal examinations at the time of evaluation.

Even with a history of severe abuse such as vaginal or anal penetration, the rate of abnormal medical findings is only 5.5%.

History from the child remains the single most important diagnostic feature in coming to the conclusion that a child has been sexually abused.Slide19

Kellogg, et al. Pediatrics 2004;113:e67-e69.

Genital Anatomy in Pregnant Adolescents:

“Normal” Does Not Mean “Nothing Happened”

Genital examination on 36 pregnant girls

Average age 15.1 years (12.3-17.8)

Normal/nonspecific exam 64% (n=22)

Inconclusive finding 22% (n=8)

Suggestive 8% (n=4)

Definite penetration 6% (n=2)Slide20

How do WE overcome the perceptionSlide21

The 72 Hour Rule: Based on

Adults

SPERM COUNT

Sample Few + ++ +++ ++++

Internal vaginal 7 7 3 1.5 1.5

External vaginal 7 3 2-3 2 1

Internal anal 2-3 2-3 2 1 1

External anal 3 3 2 2 1

Oral/saliva 2 2 2 2 N/A

Estimated number of days from intercourse by sperm amount.

(adapted from Allard JE, Science & Justice 1997;37:99-108.)Slide22

Christian, et al. Pediatrics 2000;106:100-4.

Forensic Data in

Prepubertal

Children

Retrospective Study (5 years)

Children < 10 years old

“Rape Kits” collected and processed

273 patients

78% girls

79% African American

Average Age: 5.3 yearsSlide23

Christian, et al. Pediatrics 2000;106:100-4.

Forensics:

Prepubertal

Children

PHYSICAL EXAM FINDINGS:

23% had acute

anogenital

injury

88% with injury seen within 24 hrs.

Injury associated with forensic findings (p < 0.001)

5 children with injury after 24 hrs, none with forensic evidence.Slide24

Christian, et al. Pediatrics 2000;106:100-4.

Forensics: Prepubertal Children

FORENSIC EVIDENCE found in 24.5%

64% found on clothing

11% from vagina

8% from anus / rectum

5% from secretions on body

2% from mouthSlide25

Christian, et al. Pediatrics 2000;106:100-4.

Forensics: Prepubertal Children

FORENSIC EVIDENCE FOUND:

14% of children had sperm found

11% had semen found

14% had blood found

3% had pubic hair found

< 1% had foreign debris foundSlide26

Christian, et al. Pediatrics 2000;106:100-4.

CHILDREN WITH FORENSIC

EVIDENCE:

All were seen within 44 hrs. of the assault

90% were seen within 24 hrs.

No sperm / semen from body found > 9 hrs.

No blood from body found > 13 hrs.Slide27

Christian, et al. Pediatrics 2000;106:100-4.

Hours since sexual assault

Any forensic evidence vs. time

# of

childrenSlide28

Christian, et al. Pediatrics 2000;106:100-4.

Forensic evidence from child’s body vs. time.

Hours since sexual assault

# of childrenSlide29

Christian, et al. Pediatrics 2000;106:100-4.

CONCLUSIONS

Time since assault is a useful clinical indicator for collecting forensic evidence.

Swabbing genitals futile after 24 hrs.

Collection from body unhelpful after 48 hrs.

Practices vary among institutions.

Don’t rely on child’s history of assault.

Don’t forget to collect the clothes!Slide30

IT IS A PROCESS…..Slide31

Late outcriesWhy didn’t they

tell

Why did they

tell

Who did they tellSlide32

Other obstacles….. reallySlide33

Children rarely tell right away.Slide34

There is rarely scientific evidence.Slide35

Perpetrators rarely dress in trench coats and hide in dark alleys.Slide36

Children often like or even love their perpetrator.Slide37

Moms will choose their boyfriends over their children.Slide38

There is no way to predict how a child will respond to sexual abuse.Slide39

Justice is rarely swift.Slide40

The words of the child are the “evidence” we rely on to prove a case.Slide41

Advantages of Teamed Investigation

Each agency contributes unique strengths to the investigation

Shared information & expertise

Reduces redundancy

Eliminates confusion

Reduces amount of trauma to survivors and non-offending caregivers

Higher level of success for criminal prosecution and civil court actions

Prevention of future abuse of children