PPT-Logic & Critical Reasoning

Author : phoebe-click | Published Date : 2015-10-12

Translation into Propositional Logic Steps for Translating into PL Step 1 Read the passage in English and determine all significant units within the passage

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Logic & Critical Reasoning" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Logic & Critical Reasoning: Transcript


Translation into Propositional Logic Steps for Translating into PL Step 1 Read the passage in English and determine all significant units within the passage Step 2 Set a scheme of abbreviation by assigning propositional letters of PL such as P Q R to sentences of the passage you are translating such as John is tall or Mary is smart. Diagramming Arguments. Two Types of Argument Structure. Arguments can either be complex or atomic. . An atomic argument has a single conclusion with a single set of premises supporting that conclusion.. Truth-Tree Analysis. Truth-Tree Analysis. . A . tree-test . is a consistency test for a given input. . of formulas. . . The stack is the input, and by applying the rules. . for. . tree construction one breaks down all complex formulas into either affirmations or negations of atomic statement letters.. Trial & Error. Ginny Price, MS, CVT, VTS (Behavior). St Petersburg College. Veterinary Technology Program, AS. Measure first. First day of class measured critical thinking using ARC & a scenario I wrote. Informal Fallacy Guide. Evaluating Arguments. The primary task of critical thinking is to identify arguments and to evaluate them.. There are two basic ways of evaluating arguments.. One technique is to evaluate the logical form of an argument by abstracting on its content, and analyzing the structure of the argument in order to determine if it is valid.. Pushpak Bhattacharyya. CSE Dept., . IIT Bombay . Lecture–4: Fuzzy . Inferencing. 29. th. July 2010. Meaning of fuzzy subset. Suppose, following classical set theory we say. if . Consider the n-hyperspace representation of A and B. Deductive reasoning. , also . deductive logic. or . logical deduction. or, informally, . ". top-down. " logic. , is the process of . reasoning. from one or more . statements. (premises) to reach a logically certain conclusion. It differs from . Identifying arguments. The Object of Analysis. In . logic . and critical reasoning . one studies . argumentation.. From the perspective of critical reasoning an . argument. is specific kind of object of analysis.. by. Murat . Sensoy. , . Geeth. de Mel, . Wamberto. . Vasconcelos. . and Timothy J. Norman. Computing Science, University of Aberdeen, UK. 1. Outline. Introduction. Motivation. OLP Architecture. A Case Study and Performance. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/excellence-e-learning-asking-right-questions-ken-turner-lion-?trk=hb_ntf_MEGAPHONE_ARTICLE_POST. Critical thinking. Critical Thinking. Critical thinking has to do with evaluating information and determining . Truth-Table Analysis. What is a Truth-Table . A truth-table is a table that shows the distribution of truth-values, T and F, over a set of compound formulas. The distribution is determined by a fixed set of truth-values as inputs, the definitions of the truth functions involved in the compound formulas, and the determination of dependency.. Thinking. CCC8001. 2. nd. Term 2013. introduction. Course Particulars. Instructor: Dr. Michael Johnson. Office: Room HSH219, Ho Sin Hang Building. Office Hours: . Monday. s . 15:00 to . 16:00. Email: . Questions Drive Thinking. Write down the most important question you have right now.. The mind is its own place. In itself, it can make a hell of a heaven or a heaven of a hell.. -John Milton. My Students …. Circular reasoning (also known as paradoxical thinking or circular logic), is a logical fallacy in which "the . reasoner. begins with what he or she is trying to end up with". The individual components of a circular argument will sometimes be logically valid because if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true, and will not lack relevance. Circular logic cannot prove a conclusion because, if the conclusion is doubted, the premise which leads to it will also be doubted. Begging the question is a form of circular reasoning. [EBOOK] My First Logic Workbook for Gritty Kids: Spatial Reasoning, Math Puzzles, Logic Problems, Focus Activities. (Develop Problem Solving, Critical Thinking, Analytical STEM Skills in Kids Ages 4, 5, 6.)
http://skymetrix.xyz/?book=1735770884

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Logic & Critical Reasoning"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents