Lesson 2 of 2 Home learning Q uestions on page 139 Connector Name and describe what is shown Connector Group presentation review Drive reduction Inverted U Catastrophe Drive Theory Hull 1943 ID: 214126
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Arousal" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Arousal
Lesson 2 of 2Slide2
Home learning
Q
uestions on page 139Slide3
Connector
Name and describe what is shownSlide4
Connector
Group presentation review
Drive reduction
Inverted U
Catastrophe Slide5
Drive Theory
(Hull, 1943)
Proposed a
linear
relationship
between arousal and performance
As arousal increases so will quality of performance
Higher levels of arousal would intensify the dominant response
For Elite performers this is likely to be correct response
For beginners likely to be incorrect response
Spence and Spence (1968) adapted it using an equation:-Performance = Habit strength x drive
Now considered an inadequate explanation
When arousal reaches a high enough point performance will not improve
RonaldoSlide6
DRIVE THEORY
Performance = Habit strength X Drive
P = H D
The more an elite sports person is aroused the better their performance due to the dominant response being chosen is habitual.
The more a beginner sports person is aroused the dominant response may be incorrect and high levels of arousal can cause a deterioration in performance.Slide7
PROBLEMS WITH DRIVE THEORY
The habitual behaviour/ dominant response is not always the correct one (think of beginners)
By increasing drive (arousal) performers often resort to previously learned skills because they are dominant but may be incorrect.
Even highly skilled players ‘choke’ in highly charged situations
.
Anything else? Does not consider somatic and cognitive Slide8
Inverted U Hypothesis
(Yerkes and
Doson
, 1908)
Suggests that performance will increase with arousal to an optimum point.
However if you go beyond that point then performance will decrease
From observations this seems to fit very well, however, it is too simplistic
Does it apply equally to the different phases of learning?
Does
it apply to all sports performance in the same way?
Slide9
PROBLEMS WITH INVERTED U THEORY
Critics question if optimal arousal always occurs at the mid-point of the curve.
One curve does not explain the different optimal levels of arousal needed for simple and complex tasks
. Anything else? Slide10
Does it apply equally to the different phases of learning?
Beginners find it more difficult to cope with arousal
Less habitual (Similar to Drive theory)
Need to give more attention to the skill itself and arousal levels make take concentration away
Rely heavily on environmental cues, may miss what is unexpected
Performance
Arousal
Cognitive
Associative
AutonomousSlide11
Does it apply to all sports performance in the same way
?
Can vary according to the skill being performed
Gross skills benefit from higher levels of arousal then fine skills
Shot Putt compared to Archery
Can vary within a sport dependant upon role
Rugby forwards compared to backs
Lion's team talk
Performance
Arousal
Fine/
ComplexGross/SimpleSlide12
AROUSAL THEORIES (3)
CATASTROPHE THEORY
A theory that predicts a rapid decline in performance resulting from the combination of high cognitive anxiety and increasing somatic anxiety.
Devised by
Hardy and
Frazey
(1987)
Is a development of the Inverted U theory but involves a faster and more dramatic reduction in performance.
It is more a model than theory because it tries to predict human behaviour rather than explain it
. How does it differ from inverted U? Slide13
CATASTROPHE THEORY
Point A
Cognitive anxiety is high.
Somatic anxiety is low.
Performance is enhanced.
Point B
Cognitive anxiety is high.
Somatic anxiety is high.
Performance can deteriorate.
Point C
Performance still deteriorating.
Point D
Performance does not return to original level immediately even though performer is trying to decrease arousal.
The worst over ever?Slide14
CATASTROPHE THEORY
Physiological arousal is related to performance in an inverted ‘U’ fashion when the athlete is not worried or has low cognitive anxiety state anxiety.
If cognitive anxiety is high, the increases in arousal pass a point of optimal arousal and a rapid decline in performance occurs (the catastrophe).
It would be very difficult to recover from this point.Slide15
AROUSAL AND ITS IMPACT ON PERFORMANCE
Once we attain our optimum level our reactions are at their fastest, we are able to screen out irrelevant information and do NOT suffer from
Attentional
Narrowing
and Attentional Wastage
Attentional Narrowing:
Focusing on too narrow a range of information or on the performance of a skill; this causes the performer to ignore important cues or information.
This occurs when a performer is so tightly focused on performing the skill, or on a small part of the display (e.g. the defender in front of them), that they do not attend to other important aspects or they miss important cues (e.g. team mates they could pass to).Slide16
Outcomes
C
ritique the ZOF and explain what is required to enter ‘being in the zone’
C
ompare the ZOF with the inverted U theory
Critique Peak Flow Experience taking into consideration the factors that may interfere with the experienceSlide17
Provide a sporting example for A and BSlide18Slide19
ZOF – Consider the type of skillSlide20
Read the articles on Page 137
Share your thoughtsSlide21
Prove it review
Do you understand
the following?
drive
, inverted U and catastrophe
theories
practical applications and impact on performance
Zone of Optimal Functioning and peak flow experience