PPT-Event Variables and Framing Effects

Paul M Pietroski University of Maryland Outline Framing effects eg Kahneman and Tversky Some puzzles concerning natural language event variables Two chipmunks chased each other. e categorical and continuous variables Thus handout will explain the difference between the two With binary in dependent variables marginal effects measure discrete change ie how do predicted probabilities change as the binary independent variable c Paul M. Pietroski. University of Maryland. Dept. of Philosophy, Dept. of Linguistics . James Atlas on Global Warming. (NY Times: Nov 25, 2012) . "a good chance that New York City will sink beneath the sea". Lyytinen . & . Gaskin. Interaction – Definition. In factorial designs, interaction effects are the . joint effects . of two predictor variables in addition to the individual main effects. . This is another form of . ?. . Paul M. Pietroski. University of Maryland. Outline. Gesture at some initial puzzles for truth conditional semantics. Introduce some other puzzles concerning “action reports,” which were supposed to . and. Stuffing. Advanced Computer Networks . Framing & Stuffing Outline. Synchronous . vs. Asynchronous Transmissions. Asynchronous Character Transmissions. Framing – Identifying Synchronous Block Boundaries. the Quality of Laboratory Testing. Andy Saleh . BA, BSc, MT (ASCP). Chief Quality Office. MedLabs Consultancy Group. Effects of Pre-analytical Variables on the Quality of Laboratory Testing. In this presentation: We will look at…. Mr. Brock. Lumber. 2x4s are not actually 2” by 4”. Lumber. The lumber is cut 2” by 4” but after being planed and dressed the actual dimensions are 1 ½ by 3 ½ inches. . 1 inch boards are only planed and dressed to ¾ of an inch, so a 1x4 is actually ¾ by 3 ½ . S. Uznanski. CERN, Geneva, Switzerland. The Nuclear and Space Radiation Effects Conference. July . 16. -20, 2012, Miami. , FL. Conference information. 2. NSREC 2012: . 10 sessions, short course and data workshop:. and. Stuffing. Advanced Computer Networks . Framing & Stuffing Outline. Synchronous . vs. Asynchronous Transmissions. Asynchronous Character Transmissions. Framing – Identifying Synchronous Block Boundaries. Independent Variable. Caffeine. Timeof. day. . influences. Dependent Variable. Number. of words recalled. Tea/. Coffee. Noise. Extraneous. Variables. 2 Conditions. Independent Variable. Caffeine. Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology. Class Experiment. Class Experiment. Print . out the . Class experiment . . (listed . on syllabus page) . exercise and . bring it to labs this week. Turn in your data sheets (pass to front). Satish . Nargundkar. Georgia State University. Framing and Cognitive Bias. Positive Framing. . Risk Averse behavior. Negative Framing . Risk Seeking behavior. Tversky. , . Kahnemann. . (1981). Framing. Introduction . „. News is a global phenomenon that pervades many different types of media, it is important to develop an understanding of how news effects the masses who consume media sources like Fox, CNN, MSNBC, and the Daily Show. Through the examination of framing theory, selective exposure theory, and agenda setting theory; our research provides a better understanding of how news affects their audiences. . Framing the News 2 Framing the News 3 Framing the News 4 Framing the News 5 Framing the News 6 Framing the News 7 1 Statement by government news maker 2 News organization enterprise 3 Analysis