/
Kano’s Model of Customer Satisfaction Kano’s Model of Customer Satisfaction

Kano’s Model of Customer Satisfaction - PowerPoint Presentation

sherrill-nordquist
sherrill-nordquist . @sherrill-nordquist
Follow
429 views
Uploaded On 2018-06-20

Kano’s Model of Customer Satisfaction - PPT Presentation

How to Delight Your Customers A Nitipan Ratanasawadwat Assumption University of Thailand Origins of the Kano Model Noriaki Kano Professor at Tokyo Rika University International Consultant ID: 662445

satisfaction customer model quality customer satisfaction quality model kano performance attributes product amp data customers dimensions service output requirements

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Kano’s Model of Customer Satisfaction" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Kano’s Model of Customer SatisfactionHow to Delight Your Customers

A.

Nitipan

Ratanasawadwat

Assumption University of ThailandSlide2

Origins of the Kano ModelNoriaki Kano

Professor at Tokyo Rika University

International Consultant

Received individual Demming Prize in 1997Slide3

IntroductionProduct/service quality is main antecedent of customer satisfaction

(Cronin & Taylor 1992; Anderson & Sullivan 1993; Brady et al. 2002)

Important to find out how each attribute performance impacts on satisfaction

Prof. Kano pointed out that not all product/service attributes have same role in satisfying customer needsSlide4

Origins of the Kano ModelDeveloped foundation for an approach on “Attractive Quality Creation” commonly referred to as the “Kano Model”

Challenged traditional Customer Satisfaction Models that More is better, i.e. the more you perform on each service attribute the more satisfied the customers will

beSlide5

Origins of the Kano Model Proposed new Customer Satisfaction model (Kano Model)

Performance on product and service attributes is not equal in the eyes of the customers

Performance on certain categories attributes produces higher levels of satisfaction than

othersSlide6

IntroductionSeparate among satisfaction, dissatisfaction and delight since factors that dissatisfy and that delight are often different

(Rust,

Zahorik

& Keiningham 1994)Ex. If a customer approaches an ATM then finds it to be out of cash, the customer will likely be dissatisfied, but it is unlikely that finding an ATM stocked with cash would satisfy or delight the customer Slide7

Kano’s Model of Satisfaction Technique use to determine which influence the attributes of products and/or services have on customer satisfaction (Kano et al. 1984)Slide8

Kano’s Model of SatisfactionWhich products and services can be used to obtain a high level of customer satisfaction?

Which product features have a more than proportional influence on satisfaction

Which attributes are an absolute must in the eyes of the customer?Slide9

Kano’s Model of Satisfaction Product/service attributes can be classified into three groups

Basic attributes/

dissatisfiers

/Must-havePerformance/one-dimensional attributesExciting attributes/satisfiers/AttractiveSlide10

Basic Attributes/Dissatisfiers

Minimum required features that customer naturally expect from a product/service

Not able to elicit satisfaction but can produce dissatisfaction when not fulfilled

ex. Punctually and safety of airlineSlide11

Performance/One-dimensional AttributesProduce both satisfaction dissatisfaction depending on performance levels

satisfaction is proportional to the level of fulfillment of these attributes

ex

. Gasoline consumption of a car; lower consumption leads to higher customer satisfactionSlide12

Exciting Attributes/SatisfiersProduce satisfaction when delivered but cause no dissatisfaction if not delivered

High performance on these has a greater impact on overall satisfaction rather than low performance

ex

. (unexpected) promotional offersSlide13

Three-Factor Theory Slide14

Typical Research FrameworkSlide15

Kano’s Model Process

Identify the Voice of the Customer

Translate Voice of the Customer into Critical to Quality Characteristics (CTQs)

Rank the CTQs into three categories:Dissatisfier - Must

be’s

– Cost of Entry

Satisfier – More is better – Competitive

Delighter – Latent Need – Differentiator

Evaluate Current PerformanceSlide16

Kano ModelSlide17

Kano Model Procedure

Analyze &

Brainstorm

Research

Plot &

Diagram

Strategize

Research available data sources

Determine data collection strategy

Design data collection instruments

Collect and summarize

data

Analyze results from data collection

Brainstorm list of features and functionality

Develop Functional and Dysfunctional Questionnaire

Distribute Questionnaire

Develop Customer Requirement Matrix

Record Questionnaire results in Matrix and Summarize

Plot results on Kano Model

Determine Project selection

Product Development

Service Development

Identify Marketing StrategySlide18

1. ResearchMust Be’s

- Focus Groups, Lawsuits and Regulations, Buzz on Internet

Satisfiers

- Competitive Analysis, Interviews, Surveys, Search Logs, Usablity Testing, Customer ForumsDelighters - Field Research, Marketing/Branding Vision, Industrial Design, Packaging, Call Center Data, Site LogsSlide19

2. Analyze & Brainstorm

Analyze data from available sources

Brainstorm list of features and functionality

Determine type of requirements: Output Requirements Service RequirementsKano Model Requirements Survey

User Survey

“Functional form” vs. “Dysfunctional Form”

“How would you feel if the product

had

feature X?”

“How would you feel if the product

didn’t have

feature X?”

Kano Questionnaire Answers:

I like it.

I expect it.

I’m neutral.

I can tolerate it.

I dislike it.Slide20

Example: Requirements SurveySlide21

Example: Requirements QuestionnaireSlide22

Functional vs. Dysfunctional ComparisonSlide23

Functional vs. Dysfunctional Comparison

Basic AttributeSlide24

Functional vs. Dysfunctional Comparison

Performance AttributeSlide25

Functional vs. Dysfunctional Comparison

Exciting AttributeSlide26

Evaluation Customer Requirements

C.R.

A

E

O

R

Q

I

Total

Grade

1

3

6

14

23

O

2

5

6

11

1

23

O

3

6

1

4

1

11

23

I

4

13

10

23

E

5

11

1

2

9

23

A

Customer

Requirement is

:

A: Attractive R: Reverse Q: Questionable Result

E: Expected O: One Dimensional I: IndifferentSlide27

3. Plot & DiagramSlide28

Kano Model & QFDSlide29

4. Strategize

Project Selection

Lean Six Sigma

Design for Six SigmaOrganizational StrategyDissatisfier – Must

be’s

– Cost of Entry

Satisfier – More is better – Competitive

Delighter – Latent Need – DifferentiatorSlide30

ApplicationBreak into TeamsSelect Team Leader

Select Scribe

Select Presenter

Scenario – You work for a Hotel chain and your company is trying to identify Voice of the Customer information to improve Hotel performance.Instructions:Brainstorm important characteristics you expect when staying at a Hotel

Identify whether they are a Must be, Expected or a Delighter from a Business Client perspective and from a vacationer perspective

Add in what the current performance is for the HotelSlide31

Example ResultsSlide32

DebriefAnalysisStrategy RecommendationsSlide33

Summary of Kano ModelAnalyze and rank the voice of the customer dataDevelop into CategoriesDissatisfier – Must be’s – Cost of Entry

Satisfier – More is better – Competitive

Delighter – Latent Need – Differentiator

Identify and implement strategySlide34

Questions?Slide35

ReferencesWalder, D., (1993). Kano’s model for understanding customer-defined quality. Center For Quality of Management Journal, 39, 65 – 69.Jacobs, R., (1997). Evaluating customer satisfaction with media products and services. European Media Management Journal, 32, 11 – 18.Ungvari, S., (1999). Adding the third dimension to auqlity.

Triz Journal, 40,

31 – 35.

Sauerwein, E., Bailom, F., Matzler, K., & Hinterhuber, H. (1996). The kano model: How to delight your customers. International Working Seminar on Production Economics, 19, 313 - 327Zultner, R.E. & Mazur, G. H. ( 2006). The Kano Model: Recent Developments. The eighteenth symposium on Quality Function Deployment.Slide36

36Dimensions of Quality

Performance

ReliabilityConvenience and AccessibilityFeaturesEmpathy

Conformance to

Standards

Serviceability

Durability

Aesthetics

Consistency

Assurance

Responsiveness

Perceived QualitySlide37

37

Dimensions of Quality

( 1 of 6)

PERFORMANCE:

How

well the output does what it is supposed to do.

RELIABILITY:

probability of operating for specific time and conditions of useSlide38

38

Dimensions of Quality

(2 of 6)

CONVENIENCE and ACCESSIBILITY: How

easy it is for a customer to use the product or service.

FEATURES:

The

characteristics of the output that exceed the output’s basic functions.Slide39

39EMPATHY: The

demonstration of caring and individual attention to customers.

CONFORMANCE:

The degree to which an output meets specifications or requirements.

Dimensions of Quality

(3 of 6)Slide40

40

SERVICEABILITY:

How

easy it is for you or the customer to fix the output with minimum downtime or cost.DURABILITY:

How

long the output lasts.

AESTHETICS:

How

a product looks, feels, tastes, etc.

Dimensions of Quality

(4 of 6)Slide41

41CONSISTENCY:

The

degree to which the performance changes over time.

ASSURANCE: The knowledge and courtesy of the employees and their ability to elicit trust and confidence;

The ability of the output (and its provider) to function as promised

Dimensions of Quality

(5 of 6)Slide42

42

RESPONSIVENESS:

Willingness

and ability of employees to help customers and provide proper services.PERCEIVED

QUALITY:

The

relative

quality level of the output in the eyes of the customers.

Dimensions of Quality

(6 of 6)Slide43

43When is there too much Quality

The cost of quality

erodes the profit

The quality is too far exceeding customer expectationsRational turns to IrrationalSlide44

44

Importance of Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty

“Satisfaction is an attitude; loyalty is a behavior”

Loyal customers spend more, are willing to

pay higher prices

, refer

new clients

, and are

less costly

to do business with.

It costs

five times more

to find a new customer than to keep an existing one

happySlide45

45Measuring Customer Satisfaction

Discover customer perceptions of business effectiveness

Compare company’s performance relative to competitors

Identify areas for improvementTrack trends to determine if changes result in improvementsSlide46

46

Difficulties with Customer Satisfaction Measurement

Poor measurement schemes

Failure to identify appropriate quality dimensionsFailure to weight dimensions appropriately

Lack of comparison with leading competitors

Failure to measure potential and former customers

Confusing loyalty with satisfactionSlide47

47

Creative Problem Solving

Mess Finding

– identify symptoms

Fact Finding

– gather data; operational definitions

Problem Finding

– find the root cause

Idea Finding

– brainstorming

Solution Finding

– evaluate ideas and proposals

Implementation

– make the solution work