7 . Evidence -based management: - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

7

.

Evidence

-based management:

Research designs

Slide2

Empirical circle

Slide3

Research designs:

4

elements

Randomization

Comparison

Before

vs

after

Prospective

vs

retrospective

Slide4

Randomized controlled study

Controlled before-after study

Cohort / panel study

Before-after study

Post-test only study

Survey

Case study

ExperimentQuasi-experimentObservational studyLongitudinal studyCross-sectional studyQualitative study

Research

designs: terms

Slide5

CBA: controlled before-after study

In a controlled

before-after study

two or more groups are compared with each other, usually comprising one group in which an intervention is carried out (experimental group) and one group where no or an alternative intervention is conducted (control group).

Slide6

=

CBA: controlled before-after study

Slide7

In the case of randomization, the groups compared with each other are selected entirely randomly, for example by drawing lots. This means that each participant (or other unit such as a team, department or company) has an equal chance of being in the intervention or control group. In this way, the influence of any distorting factors is spread over both groups so that these groups are as comparable as possible with each other with the exception of the intervention.

Better (but not always feasible): randomization

Slide8

=

even

oneven

Randomized controlled study (RCT)

Slide9

Cohort / panel study

Starting point:

intervention/exposure (independent variable)

Longitudinal study where large groups of people or companies (cohort / panel) are followed over a long period to see (prospective) whether differences occur among the groups.

=

Slide10

Case-control study

Starting

point:

outcome

(dependent variable)

Longitudinal study in which one group of people or companies with a particular outcome

is compared retrospectively with a group that does not have this outcome.

=

✔

✗

VS

VS

Slide11

Examples of

(flawed) case

-control studies

Slide12

versus

Study in which data are obtained or particular characteristics are measured of a population before versus after an intervention / exposure / event, to measure the effect or correlation.

Before-after study

Slide13

=

Posttest-only

Slide14

Cross-sectional study

Study in which data of a statistically significant sample of a population (managers, CEO’s, employees) is gathered at one point in time. It provides a snapshot of the current condition but does not explain cause and effect.

Cross-sectional studies include surveys

Slide15

Cross-sectional study

?

?

?

Slide16

Study in which

a large number (qualitative or quantitative) of aspects of a single case (organization or team) was investigated in depth over a long period within the case’s own context.

Case study

Slide17

Experimental research

‘True’ experiment: RCT

‘Quasi’ experiment: CBA

Experimental

research refers to studies where the researcher

manipulates one (or more) variable and controls the other variable(s) to determine whether there is a causal relation between the manipulated variable and the outcome.

Slide18

Observational research

Natural experiment

Cohort

/ panel study

Case-control

study

Observational research refers to studies where the researcher merely observes but does not intervene, with the intention of finding correlations among the observed data

Slide19

Qualitative research explores and tries to understand people's beliefs, experiences, attitudes, behaviour and interactions. It generates non-numerical data. The best-known qualitative research-methods include in-depth interviews, focus groups, documentary analysis and participant observation.

Qualitative research includes

Case studies

Ethnographic studies

Field research

Grounded theory approach

Qualitative research

Slide20

Longitudinal

research

Cohort

/ panel

study

Repeated measures

Times series

A longitudinal study is an observational study that involves repeated observations (measurements) of the same variable(s) over long periods of time (sometimes years or even decades).

Slide21

Mixed methods

Slide22

Better than a single study:

a replication study

Better than a replication study:

a systematic review / meta analysis

If there were

100 studies,

99 of which gave a ‘negative’ result (where, say, the new intervention appeared to be not effective)

, while one had a ‘positive’ result (were the intervention appeared effective), it would obviously be a mistake to consider only the single positive study.But ….

Slide23

Systematic review / meta-analysis

The intention behind a systematic review is to identify as fully as possible all the scientific studies of relevance to a particular subject and to assess the validity and authority of the evidence of each study separately. As the name indicates, a systematic review takes a systematic approach to identifying studies and has the methodological quality critically appraised by multiple researchers independently of each other, as a consequence of which the review is transparent and reproducible and can be monitored. The use of statistical analysis techniques in a systematic review to pool the results of the individual studies numerically in order to achieve a more accurate estimate of the effect is termed a “meta-analysis”.

Slide24

?

Systematic review / meta-analysis

Slide25

Randomized controlled study

Controlled before-after study

Cohort / panel study

Before-after study

Post-test only study

Survey

Case study

ExperimentQuasi-experimentObservational studyLongitudinal studyCross-sectional studyQualitative study

Which terms belong together?