/
Measuring the effects of a seasonal fishing closure on the Measuring the effects of a seasonal fishing closure on the

Measuring the effects of a seasonal fishing closure on the - PowerPoint Presentation

tatiana-dople
tatiana-dople . @tatiana-dople
Follow
419 views
Uploaded On 2016-12-23

Measuring the effects of a seasonal fishing closure on the - PPT Presentation

Gadus morhua off the West Coast of Scotland Joanne Clarke 1 David M Bailey 1 Peter J Wright 2 Gilbert Van Ryckevorsel WWFCanada 1 University of Glasgow 2 Marine Scotland Science ID: 505283

closure area cod clyde area closure clyde cod effort unit population landings spawning catch trawl length cpue period frequency

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Measuring the effects of a seasonal fish..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Measuring the effects of a seasonal fishing closure on the abundance of Atlantic Cod (

Gadus morhua) off the West Coast of Scotland

Joanne Clarke1*, David M Bailey1, Peter J Wright2

© Gilbert Van Ryckevorsel / WWF-Canada

1University of Glasgow; 2Marine Scotland Science

* j.clarke.1@research.gla.ac.uk

Catch control measures for commercial species are often at a spatial scale greater than that of local population dynamics, making individual spawning components vulnerable to extirpation

Spawning

aggregations often occur at times and places that are predictable making them more

vulnerable to high levels of exploitation at this timeAggregative behaviour causes localised increases in catchability compared to other times of the year, resulting in high fishing mortalityTherefore the introduction of an area closure during an aggregation period can reduce fishing mortality directly, whilst permitting sustainable exploitation outside of the spawning periodCod off the West Coast of Scotland are managed as a single stock within ICES Area VIa3 sub-populations of cod have been identified within this area (Wright et al., 2006)Spawning stock biomass of cod off the West Coast of Scotland crashed during the late 90sA seasonal area closure was introduced to the mouth of the Clyde in 2001 to protect spawning cod

Introduction

1

2

3Slide2

Objectives

Examine monthly Landings per Unit Effort (

LPUE)Compare annual trends in Catch per Unit Effort (CPUE)3. Compare the

length frequency distributions

Methods

Commercial landings per unit effort were investigated for each area prior to the area closure

Clyde

Trawls used were from within 60km distance of the known spawning aggregations of each of the 3 sub-populations

The seasonal area closure was introduced into the mouth of the Clyde in 2001 prohibiting certain types of fishing during the spawning period

MinchSouth West

A Before/After, Control/Impact analysis was conducted to identify if there had been a change in trend of mature cod in the Clyde sub-population after the area closure was introduced compared to the other 2 sub-populations

Aims

To identify if cod aggregate in survey areas and determine if there has been an effect of the area closure on the sub-population of cod in the Clyde.

Study Area

BACI

B

efore

= 1986-2000

A

fter

= 2001-2010

Control = Minch and SW

Impact = Clyde

CPUE was grouped into 5 cm length bins to compare the length frequency distribution between “Before” and “After” for each sub-population.  

Catch

per Unit Effort (CPUE) of mature cod

caught by

the international bottom trawl survey (IBTS)

during quarter 1 were

used for the analysis

from 1986 to 2010. Slide3

Results

BACI-Catch per Unit Effort (CPUE)

Before

After

Commercial Data

Sum of Landings

Landings per Unit Effort

Left Figure

: Sum of total

landings in Kilograms for each location for each month during time period 1986-2000 for all vessel types. Right Figure: Mean (+/- SE) Corrected Landings Per Unit Effort (CLPUE) for vessels using Beam Trawl; Gill Nets Pelagic; Light Trawl; Trawl Single Demersal; Pair Trawl Demersal; Seine net and Nephrops trawl for each month for the time period 1986-2000   Conclusion: Landings and catch rate (LPUE) peak for each area during the spawning period indicating aggregating codThe log of the fitted values ±1.96*standard error taken from the model of best fit for Catch per unit Effort (CPUE) for each sub-population “Before” (left) and “After” (right) the area closure.   Conclusion: Model of best fit does not include 3-way interaction indicating no effect of the area closure on changes in population trends in the Clyde sub-population

Evidence

of aggregations

from elevated landings

per unit effort (

LPUE

)

No

evidence of a local recovery on the Clyde

sub-population from trends in Catch per Unit Effort (CPUE)

No evidence of changes in length frequency distributions after the area closure in the Clyde sub-population, but no larger size class of cod being caught

Why no recovery of cod in the Clyde?too little too late?

Length

Frequency

Distribution using

Kolmogorov-Smirnoff (K-S) test

Clyde

K-S

test,

D=0.25

, p =

0.16

Before

After

Conclusion:

No significant difference in length frequency distributions between “Before” and “After” area closure for each of the sub-populations, but reduction in larger size classes being caught in the “After” period

Conclusions