/
Using academic vocabulary IV : evaluative language & re Using academic vocabulary IV : evaluative language & re

Using academic vocabulary IV : evaluative language & re - PowerPoint Presentation

tatiana-dople
tatiana-dople . @tatiana-dople
Follow
437 views
Uploaded On 2016-06-09

Using academic vocabulary IV : evaluative language & re - PPT Presentation

Week 5 Feb 16 Reviewing the Literature Academic Vocabulary IV Evaluative Language Agenda Where in your writing do you cite sources Introduction Methods Results Discussion All are possible but it depends on the field and type of writing ID: 354948

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Using academic vocabulary IV : evaluativ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Using academic vocabulary IV : evaluative language & reviewing the literature

Week 5

Feb. 16Slide2

Reviewing the LiteratureAcademic Vocabulary IV

Evaluative Language

AgendaSlide3

Where in your writing do you cite sources?Introduction? Methods? Results? Discussion?

All are possible, but it depends on the field and type of writing

What are the purposes of citing? (besides plagiarism!)

Acknowledge intellectual property rights

Show respect for previous scholarsGive your own arguments greater authorityHelp friends and colleagues (increases the “impact factor” of journals)

Reviewing the literature

(Swales &

Feak

, 2012, p 340)Slide4

Tense choice implications are subtleCan indicate who is the agent or not

Can make no reference to agency

Can indicate the distance of the researcher to our own opinion or research

Can indicate if the finding should be taken in the context of the single study or as a larger generalization.

Look at a journal you brought and find examples of this.Now look at your own.

Reviewing the literature

P344-345 HOSlide5

Huang (2007) investigated

the causes of airport delays.

Action (Huang does something)

Developed

ModeledConductedstudiedIn Huang’s (2007) investigations, he concludes that…..Saying/thinking (Huang says/thinks something)

BelievesAssumesPosits

Argues

Opines

Views

Points

Provides…Past is often used to indicate a contrast of past belief to current:Huang (2007) concluded that…, but more recent investigations reveal…

Common uses of past/presentSlide6

Integrated citations versus parenthetical citations:According to Suarez et al. (2010), the causes of business failure are closely related to the ratio of working capital, retained earnings, and sales.

Fang’s research shows that reduced working capital and retained earnings are interrelated (Fang, 2007).

Why was the first integrated, and the second not?

What are other ways of giving credit?

Under what circumstances are one or the other preferred?

Reviewing the literatureSlide7

Why vary citation patterns?Give it a try

The Origins of the First Scientific Articles

Reviewing the literatureSlide8

Options for establishing a niche:A: Counter-claiming (something is wrong)

B: Indicating a gap (something is missing)

C: Raising a question or making an inference (something is unclear)

D: Continuing a tradition (adding something)

Look at a journal you brought and find an how the author(s) established their niche.Now look at your own. Was it the niche you intended?

Reviewing the literature

Stronger

Weaker

(Swales &

Feak

, 2012, p 348)

P348-349 HOSlide9

How to focus/synthesize/organize the previous finding? (pdf

, p27-34 for example)

By possible relationships between the

chosen constructs

(e.g., a correlation between communication and satisfaction and job satisfaction)By possible mediating (intervening) and/or moderating variables that influence the relationships between chosen constructs By possible differences between groups in

chosen constructs By possible gaps, inconsistencies, controversies and/or unanswered questions which form the basis for a new study

By possible untested hypotheses or propositions in the

chosen constructs

Reviewing the literature

(

Kotze

, 2007, p 26)Slide10

Practical principles that can accomplish good organization (pdf

, p34-40 for examples):

Use a “funnel approach” by starting with the broader context and then focus in on the specific topic and issue

Carefully plan headings and subheadings that can ensure a logical flow of information (mind-maps can help in planning)

Headings should be descriptive and informative (more than one word)Make sure that information under heading is in fact well related

Reviewing the literature

(

Kotze

, 2007, p 26)Slide11

Practical principles that can accomplish clear style (pdf

, p42-43 for examples):

Write to the level of an intelligent layperson (i.e., non-academic, no expertise in the discipline of the field), such as a 100 level class in your field.

Always define unfamiliar constructs or technical terms when they are introduced the first time.

Write as though your reader is skeptical about what you write, and you need to argue your case with clear evidence and reasons for your choices.Reviewing the literature

(

Kotze

, 2007, p 41)Slide12

Evaluative Language, when we return

Break time!Slide13

Negative openings for indicating a gap:“little” + noun

However, little information…

Little attention…

Little work…

“few” + nounHowever, few studies…Few investigations…Few attempts…No/noneNo studies/data/calculations to date have…

None of these studies/findings/calculations have…

Evaluative language

P350-51

HO

(Swales &

Feak

, 2012, p 350)Slide14

Contrastive statement openings for indicating a gap:Research has tended to focus on …, rather than on…

These studies have emphasized …, as opposed to…

Although considerable research has been devoted to…, rather less attention has been paid to…

Evaluative language

(Swales &

Feak, 2012, p 352)Slide15

Consider the first two paragraphs of an article from the Journal of Materials Chemistry

(

PDF

)

How many critique/evaluative expressions can you find? (write the expressions on your own paper)Are they strongly negative or slightly negative?Can you find the language that signaled Move 1 (Establish a Research Territory)?Can you find the language that signaled Move 2 (Establish a niche)?

Evaluative language

(Swales &

Feak

, 2012, p 354)Slide16

Consider the introduction in a journal you brought:How many critique/evaluative expressions can you find? (write the expressions on your own paper)

Are they strongly negative or slightly negative?

Can you find the language that signaled Move 1 (Establish a Research Territory)?

Can you find the language that signaled Move 2 (Establish a niche)?

Now consider these same questions for your own introduction.Evaluative language

(Swales &

Feak

, 2012, p 354)Slide17

…remains elusive despite…There are however very few analyses….Yet, the literature has little empirical evidence…

…is far from sufficient…

Very little research has been done to answer the crucial question…

Has not been fully answered….

Class examples of evaluative expressionSlide18

Evaluative language can be used in claims about your own writing and about others’ writing.Phrases can weaken and strengthen

Distance can weaken and strengthen

Verbs can weaken and strengthen (

appear, seem, tend

)Do you prefer to look at models (journals you brought) or your own writing?Look for this language in the intro (establishing a niche), in data commentary (remarking about your data), discussion (making final claims)

Evaluative language

P160-161 HO

(Swales &

Feak

, 2012, p 160)Slide19

…can be reasonably confident……may be……it would be useful to confirm…

It is some concern that…

Class examples of

strengthening & weakeningSlide20

Grammar & wordingLiterature review

Goes too quickly to the study issue without situating it in the related research

Insufficient review of the literature, causing the reviewer to note oversights & misunderstandings

Personal definitions rather than giving attribution

Analysis & designClaims about results were problematic for the research designSample size too small for the complexity and claimsCauses and effects in the design not well addressed

Applied Linguistics Reviewer (

PDF

)Slide21

Continue to apply what you’ve learned in your editing.Consider staying on contact with your peer from class or connect with someone else, both for encouragement and support.

Feel free to see the

powerpoints

from

this workshop at http://www.u.arizona.edu/~karaj/gpsc.html Homework