By 1890s policymakers were on a determined quest for global overseas markets that would create jobs and prosperity at home Policymakers feared that American workers would embrace socialism or communism ID: 659846
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Historians used to describe turn-of-the-..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Historians used to describe turn-of-the-century U.S. imperialism as something new…now they emphasize continuities between foreign policy in this era and the nation’s relentless earlier expansion across the continentSlide2
By 1890s, policymakers were on a determined quest for global, overseas markets that would create jobs and prosperity at home
Policymakers feared that American workers would embrace socialism or communismSlide3
1885- minister Josiah Strong,
Our Country,
predicted that American “Anglo-Saxons”—”the representative, let us hope, of the largest liberty, the purest Christianity, the highest civilization, having developed particularly aggressive traits calculated to impress its institutions upon mankind” would “spread itself over the earth”
American exceptionalism—
The idea that the United States had a unique destiny to foster democracy and civilizationSlide4
Empires have no interest in operating within an international system, they aspire to
be
the international system. Empires have no need for a balance of power.
That is how the United States has conducted its foreign policy in the Americas.
No country has so tormented itself over the gap between its moral values, which are by definition absolute, and the imperfection inherent in the concrete situation to which they must be applied.Slide5
The Rise of the American EmpireSlide6
Early Thoughts of Empire
Washington referred to America as a “nascent empire” later an “infant empire”
Jefferson was “persuaded no constitution was ever before as well calculated as ours for extending extensive empire and self- government”…the initial “confederacy “ of thirteen would be “the nest from which all America, North and South would be peopled”
Madison (10
th
Federalist Papers)
argued for “extend[
ing
] the sphere” to create a larger republic
Monroe defended westward expansion:
It must be obvious to all, that the further the expansion is carried, provided it be not beyond the just limit, the greater will be the freedom of action to both [state and federal] Governments, and the more perfect their security; and, in all other respects, the better the effect will be to the whole American people. Extent of territory, whether it be great or small, give to a nation many of its characteristics
.
It marks the extent of its resources, of its population, of its physical force. It marks, in short, the difference between a great and a small power”Slide7
Hamilton (1
st
Federalist Papers)
referred to the US as “in many respects the most interesting…empire…in the world,” looking forward to the emergence of a “great American system, superior to the control of all trans-Atlantic force of influence, and able to dictate the terms of connection between the Old and the New World”Slide8
History of U.S. Foreign Policy
George Washington: “no foreign entanglements”
James Monroe 1823: American affairs=the whole Western Hemisphere
1) US would not get involved in European affairs
2) US would not interfere with existing European colonies in the Western Hemisphere
3) No other nation could form a new colony in the Western Hemisphere
4) If they did the US would view it as a hostile act against the US...the peoples of the West “are henceforth, not to be considered subjects for future colonization by any European powers”
Not really used or known as Monroe Doctrine until the 1900s
So until the 1890s into the 1900s, America practiced isolationismSlide9
The America Frontier– “Manifest Destiny” & Cash
Conquering the Native Americans relatively easy; establishing
terra nullius,
free, ownerless land
None of other European powers posed a fatal threat to US after 1783
Bought Louisiana Purchase—eight hundred thousand square miles for $11.2 million from France (1803)
*
Britain agreed to boundary at 49
th
parallel for southern boundary of Canada (1812)
Spain relinquished Florida and recognized new western boundary along border of what became Oklahoma (1815)
With the War with Mexico and $20 million, the US acquired Texas, Upper California, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, Utah and Nevada (1848)
*
The
Gasden
Purchase cost $10 million in 1853
*
Alaska cost $7.2 million in 1867
*Slide10
New Markets
1880s – James G. Blaine (Secretary of State) voiced that “openings of assured and profitable enterprise” for northern industry “in the mines of South America and the railroads of Mexico…even in mid-ocean” and that it was “the especial province of this country to improve and expand its trade with the nations of America”
Early 1890s, Indiana senator Albert J. Beveridge claimed “American factories are making more that the American people can use; American soil is producing more than they can consume. Fate has written our policy for us; the trade of the world must and shall be ours…We will establish trading posts throughout the world as distributing points for American products…Great colonies governing themselves, flying our flag and trading with us, will grow about our posts of trade…And American law, American order, American civilization, and the American flag will plant themselves on shores hitherto bloody and benighted, but by those agencies of God henceforth to be made beautiful and
bright”
Between
1865—1900,
American coal production rose by 800%
r
ailway
track mileage
rose by
567%
wheat
production rose by 256
%
immigration
doubled the
populationSlide11
Economic Imperialism
Components of economic imperialism were equal on both sides of the Atlantic:
A desire to reduce other people’s tariffs (Open Door)
A confidence that overseas investment would beget new export markets
A readiness to use political and military leverage to outwit competition
Ideological currents—social Darwinism…no desire to shoulder the “white man’s burden”Slide12
Moving Outside the Continent-- Imperialism
Was obtaining colonies outside the borders even constitutional?
Chief Justice Roger B. Taney (1857): there was “certainly no power given by the Constitution to the Federal Government to establish or maintain colonies bordering on the United States or at a distance, to be ruled and governed at its own pleasure; not to enlarge its territorial limits in any way, except by admission of new States”
First overseas possessions were islands desirable only as naval bases
1867-Midway
1877-Pago Pago
1898-Guam & Wake Island,
P
hilippines, Puerto Rico
1898-Overthrow of Hawaii and annexation
In 1899 A. Lawrence Lowell (
Harvard Review):
“Possession may also be acquired as not to form part of the United States, and in that case constitutional limits, such as those requiring uniformity of taxation and trial by jury do not apply” (later confirmed in
Downes
v Bidwell 1901)Slide13
“This accession of territory affirms forever the power of the United States, and I have just given England a maritime rival that sooner or later will lay low her pride”
----Napoleon BonaparteSlide14Slide15Slide16Slide17
American ImperialismSlide18
1890-1914
Shift from continental to world power
Anglo-American concept
Special bond forming between US and Britain
US complete control of Latin America
Putting teeth in Monroe Doctrine
Britain extricates itself
Closed sphere of influence
Increasing presence in Asia
Open Door sphere of influence
Double standard
Begin collision course with Japan
Myth of American exceptionalism
Makes American feel good
Fostering economic development and spreading democracy
“Beacon” to shine on the rest of the world
Power of economics
Multi-national corporations
Dollar drives foreign policy
Cuba, Hawaii, Nicaragua, Philippines—all have viable systems of democratic ideals but incapable of self-rule?Slide19
Why 1890s?
Closing American frontier
Safety valve—always move
Industrial revolution
1893 financial panic
Need markets
Great social unrest
Labor unions
Get in overseas adventure, will manufacture consent
Geopolitics
Mahan—sea power
Social Darwinism
Strong must conquer weak
Yellow Press
Stirs up emotion-sensationalism
Foreign adventure stories
Internationalists—new generation
Teddy Roosevelt, Henry Cabot Lodge
Success of British model
Imperialism---”Sun never sets on the British Empire”Slide20
The Western Hemisphere
Secretary of State Richard Olney: the United States could be regarded as “practically sovereign on this continent”—”not because of pure friendship or good will felt for it…not simply by reason of its high character as a civilized state, nor because wisdom and justice and equity are the invariable characteristics of the dealings of the United States…[but] because in addition to all other grounds, its infinite resources combined with its isolated position render it master of the situation and practically invulnerable”
But US really needed a navy…enter Captain Alfred Thayer Mahan’s
The Influence of Sea Power upon History
1904—Roosevelt Corollary added to the Monroe Doctrine making US an “international police power” Big Stick Diplomacy
1907—US Navy only second to that of Great Britain and the Monroe Doctrine belatedly acquired credibilitySlide21
1898-1909
Spanish-American War
US acquires Guam, Puerto Rico & Philippines; Cuba independence
Fought a 3 year war in the Philippines
Platt Amendment kept Cuba under US “protection”
1904-Roosevelt Corollary added to the Monroe Doctrine making US an international policing power
Asserted the US unrestricted right to regulate affairs in the Caribbean
Not a treaty, only a declaration sanctioned only by US military and economic might
In 1909, US overthrew Jose Santos
Zelaya
in Nicaragua because he refuse to allow American lumber and mining companies to operate freely in his country
Began a cycle of rebellion and intervention lasting nearly a century
American banana planter angry at Honduras President Davila’s efforts to limit his land holdings and tax his exports; US troops help stage a “revolution” launched by planter and Davila forced into exileSlide22
Open Door Policy
In 1894-1895, Japan, Russia, Germany, France & Britain divide coastal China in spheres of influence
US Secretary of State John Hay sent notes claiming the right of equal trade access—an “open door” for all nations seeking to do business in China
US wanted access to huge markets in China
In 1900, Chinese nationalist (Boxers) rebelled against foreign occupation and US sent in 5,000 troops to join multinational campaign to stop the rebellion
During this time, Japan was emerging as East Asia’s dominant power startling US & Britain
Theodore Roosevelt got a Pulitzer Peace Prize for mediating a Russo-Japanese conflict over Korea and Manchuria; Roosevelt respected the Japanese and in 1908 US signed the Root-
Takahira
Agreement with Japan
In 1909, Taft entered White House and thought US was short changed in Asia—pressed for larger role for American investors “Dollar Diplomacy;” then supported Chinese nationalist
The Open Door policy with China was considered a double standard on the US because they wouldn’t open spheres of influence in Central and South AmericaSlide23
Wilson & Mexico
Since the 1870s Mexican dictator Diaz created a friendly climate for American investors who purchased railroads, plantations, mines and much coveted oil fields
By early 1900s he began to nationalize (reclaim) key resources which angered American investors
In 1911, Francisco Madero, an advocate of constitutional government who was friendlier to US interests forced Diaz to resign and proclaimed himself president
In 1913 Madero was deposed and murdered by
Victoriano
Huerta
In 1914 Wilson sent a small force of marines to seize control of the key port and oil terminal of Veracruz and prevent importation of German arms—Huerta’s regime crumbled &
Venustiano
Carranza became Mexico’s leader
Revolutionary activity did not stop and Wilson sent 11,000 troops across the border to find rebel
Pancho
Villa…they failed and began small skirmishes with the Mexican army—fearing full out war, both governments backed off
US policymakers had shown they would not only police Central America and the Caribbean but also Mexico when they deemed it necessary Slide24
20
th
-Century Overall
Factors that shaped foreign policy:
1) Economics
Multi-national corporations
Economic power elite-political system
Cold-War military-industrial complex
2) Ideology
Vision of national greatness—American exceptionalism
Racial hierarchy-cultural superiority
Extreme anti-revolutionary
Unilateralism – acting alone and independent
3) Domestic politics
Can’t appear weak
Nation of ill-informed immigrants
4) Rise of imperial presidency
Bypass checks & balances
Violates foundation of American Government
5) Resource wars
oil
Slide25
In the 20
th
-century, no country has influenced international relations as decisively and at the same time as ambivalently as the United States. No society has more firmly insisted on the inadmissibility of intervention in the domestic affairs of other states, or more passionately asserted that its own values were more universally applicable. No nation has been more pragmatic in the day-to-day conduct of its diplomacy, or more ideological in the pursuit of its historic moral convictions. No country has been more reluctant to engage itself abroad even while undertaking alliances and commitments of unprecedented reach and scope.
Henry Kissinger
Secretary of State 1973-1977