Captain John T Dye Jr Nature of Brief Informational Decisional Ready Relevant Learning Initiative Issue Summary Develop Block Learning for 77 Ratings and conduct analysis for 6 pilot ratings to support FY17 Content Reengineering ID: 759447
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "SAILOR 2025 Ready Relevant Learning" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
SAILOR 2025Ready Relevant Learning
Captain John T. Dye Jr.
Slide2Nature of Brief
Informational
/DecisionalReady, Relevant Learning Initiative
Issue SummaryDevelop Block Learning for 77 Ratings and conduct analysis for 6 pilot ratings to support FY17 Content Re-engineeringEffectively manage contract funding in support of Ready Relevant Learning
Context /AssumptionsBlock Training will utilize existing curriculum, and current training delivery methods and locationsFleet SMEs and Learning Center resources will be available to perform required analysis and validate Block Learning recommendationsContract centrally managed by NETC N7 with dedicated support from NETC N-Codes and Learning Centers NETC N5, N7, LCs, NAVMAC, and the Fleet must partner for Block Learning to succeedPartner with NETC N6 to identify Information Technology required to support Block Learning & the Learning Continuums
Way AheadLearning Centers Provide Specified Courseware for Block LearningContract Award (SEP 2015)Team Composition Team TrainingBlock Learning for 77 Ratings (Accession Training)Validate with Requirement SponsorModify Courses to Re-Phase TrainingUpdate SchedulesPerform Assessments, and Adjust Training as RequiredBuild Learning Continuums (Journeyman & Master)
Ready Relevant Learning
2
Slide3DefinitionsRRL
BLOCK LEARNING (Interim Step to RRL)The reorganization of current “As Is” training and delivery methods into blocks to be delivered closer to the time of actual use in the performance of duties. Redistribute accession level training courses across the Delayed Entry Program, initial service schools, and first two operational tours. RRL/LEARNING CONTINUUM A learning model that combines self-development, institutional training and operational experience that begins when a Sailor enters the Navy and ends when they retire. The model should provide more relevant, tailored, and engaging learning experiences through a career long continuum of learning that is not location-dependent, but accessed at the point of need. Right Training, Right Time, Right Place.
3
Slide4RRL
4
CNO Directed, Joint Initiative with USFF, CPF, NETC, CNPC, CNRC, OPNAV Resource Sponsors, TYCOM Reps, Program Offices, SYSCOMs, and NAWCTSD
Initially, Only Applies to NETC Training,
77 Ratings
Analysis Based upon a Standardized, Repeatable, and Defendable
Process to Determine “
Right
Training, Right Time, Right
Place
”
NETC E2E Process
Using AIM CPM (JDTA, to define the work) and LO Module
Goal is to Achieve a Reduction in “Brick and Mortar” Training for 30% “A” School and 70% “C” School Accession Training
Maximize Re-Use, Re-Purpose, and Reference (R3), “
Eliminate Redundancy”
Mobile Modularized Learning
Leverage Innovative Training Delivery Technologies
Proposal to assign
CCA and CCMM for Common Core Modules (e.g. Basic Electricity, Pumps, Switchboards, Radar Fundamentals, etc...)
Slide5RRL Content Re-EngineeringPhasing Matrix
5
Slide6Block LearningProject Workforce
Project Workforce (Government)NETC Project Management Team Project Management (TPOC / ATPOC / 4 Project Leads (QA) (6 member team)Rating Analysis TeamsProgram Analysts (Team Leads for ten project teams) (10 Analysts) Learning Centers Rating Analysis Teams Center Project Lead, Instructional Systems Designer and Rating Lead (3 Analysts) Rating Phasing will determine total commitment at any timeFleet3 to 5 Fleet Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)Project Workforce (Vendor) Management Team (1 Project Manager / 1 ISD Lead)10 Analysis Teams Instructional Systems Specialists (2), Database Management and input (4)
6
Slide7Collaborative Work Environment (CWE)Centrally Manages Content. Stores Source and Working FilesAllows Learning Center, NETC, and Fleet Requirement Sponsor(s) and SME’s to Review and Discuss Material, and Analyze Results OnlineRepose Comments and Actions Taken, and Maintain Schedules and TimelineRecommended solution is Blackboard, SharePoint to be utilized initially until ATO issues are resolvedContent Planning Module (CPM) - Clean DatabaseTo Establish and Create the Foundation for Future NETC Training Requirements Business Rules, Style Guide and a Properly Structured Database to Achieve Sailor 2025 Requirements is CriticalNETPDTC has Created a New AIM CPM Data Base for Sailor 2025
Create Repository
7
Slide8Identify Ratings & Courses
8
Learning CenterNumber of RatingsNumber of Rating PathsNumber of Unique CINsCID7CNATT20CSCS9CSF1CSFE7CSS10EODD2NCSC1SLC11SEAL/SWCCSWOS9Totals:77
Slide9Identify Metrics
Partner with N5 to Create MetricsMetrics to Track Progress of Block Learning for each Rating
9
NAE/N98 CNATT
:
AIRC-AWO
AIRR-AWS
AIRC-AWV
AV-AT-I
AV-AE
AV-AT-O
AIRC-AWF
AN PACT
PR
AD
AZ
AC
AG
AO
AIRR-AWR
AM
AME
AS
ABE
ABF
ABH
SWE/N96 SWOS
:
EM
GSM
MM
EN
DC
MR
FN
PACTGSEHTQMSWE/N96 CSCS:FCICGMOSETBMSTG
NIDE/N2/N6 CID
:
CTI- Korean
CTI-
Chinese
CTI-
Hebrew
CTI-
Persian
CTI-
Arabic
CTI-
Russian
CTI-
Spanish
CTM CTN CTR IS IT CTT
Example of a Metrics Chart Cognos can Provide
Slide10Gather Data
Learning CenterTraining Course Control Document (TCCD), with AnnexesFormal Course ReviewsInstructor Guide, Trainee Guide and Presentation MaterialTesting Plan and AssessmentsNETC N7CETARS CMS and Course DescriptionList of COI’s Necessary for Sailor 2025 Block / AnalysisNAVMACApproved Occupational Standards (OCCSTDs) AcquisitionNavy Training Systems Plan (NTSP)
10
Slide11Conduct Analysis
Analysis DocumentsTraining Situation Document (TSD) Documents the “As-Is” State of the Courses of InstructionProvides Data to Recommend “Block Learning”Instructional Performance Requirements Document (IPRD)Documents the Work Requirements and Puts Them into ContextProvides Data that Recommends When the Content Should be TrainedCreates the JDTA for Review Instructional Media Requirements Document (IMRD)Identifies Media Requirements, Supports “Rounding the COI Edges Between “Blocks of Learning”Job, Duty, Task Analysis (JDTA) Data Approved Work Requirements in Context in AIM CPM
JDTA Process Modified to Meet Timeline
11
Slide12USFF Proposed Governance RRL
12
Lines of Effort
Execution
Design
RRL ESC
1-2 Star
RRL ESC
Action Team
O-6 Level
R3B
FCRC
4 Star
RRL Rating Review
Working Groups
O-6 Level
One WG per rate
Conducts pilot programs
for each rate
prior to full implementation of block learning phase for that rate
Responsible for assessing impacts to readiness
Decisional
The FCRC will make final judgment on the RRL pilot and determine if RRL is applied to other rates
R3B and FCRC will provide strategic oversight and make determinations where RRL changes will impact Readiness
RRL ESC is the Flag/SES decisional body for the tactical and operational levels; all Design WGs and Rating Review WGs will brief the ESC
RRL ESC Action Team aggregates information coming out of the ESC for presentation to the R3B and the FCRC
Assessments
RRL-Wide Planning Groups
RRL Rating Review
Working Groups
O-6 Level
One WG per rate
Owns RRL for each specific rate
Manages the rate through the RRL process
Design solution options for each functional area that will be applied to all RRL rates
Provide direct liaison with individual Rating Review WGs
Training Delivery Requirements & Acquisition
Foundational
Block Learning
Content Reengineering
Mobile Modularized Learning
Integration Working Group
Coordinates RRL impact across all Navy and DoD systems and processes (e.g. DRRS, CeTARS, FLTMPS, NTSP, 3M, ITRO, etc.)
Identify resources required to update systems and processes to ensure compatibility with RRL
Integration of RRL to external Navy processes
Distribution
Assessments
DEP
IT Backbone
Resourcing
Navy Capability Board (NCB)
Determines resources required at each phase of RRL
Works within individual warfare area process to provide solutions for their aligned rates
OPNAV N80/N10
Resource Sponsors
USFF/CPF
Slide13USFF Proposed DecisionalRRL
Members
NETC *USFF *CPF TYCOM
Per COMPACFLT / COMUSFLTFORCOMINST 5000.1A
Responsibilities
Filters briefs coming up from the Design and Rating Review Working Groups prior to delivery to the ESCAggregates information and decisions coming out of the ESC for follow-on presentation to the R3B and FCRCMaintains RRL Battle RhythmProvides status to NCB as requested (quarterly/semiannually)Serves as conduit between various working/planning groupsDirect the development of a charter and approve for each Planning Working Group
CPF and CUFFC co-chair the FCRCFCRC provides strategic oversight of RRL and makes decisions on recommendations forwarded and vetted by the R3BSupported TYCOM represents the integrated voice of their warfare community to the FCRC for RRL
RRL ESC
1-2 Star
RRL ESC
Action Team
O-6 Level
R3B
FCRC
USFF *
CPF
CNETC *
CNPC
OPNAV Resource SponsorsTYCOM Reps
Flag / SES decisional body for RRL operational and tactical-level issuesAll Design Planning Groups and Rating Review Working Groups will brief the ESCInforms R3B/FCRC of decisions madeForwards the following to R3B/FCRC for final decision:Concurrence to shift each rating to Block LearningConcurrence to secure legacy training for each rating
* Co-Chair
OPNAV N1 provides resourcing for Working Group execution (manpower, travel, etc.)
13
Slide14ChallengesBlock Learning
NETC/Navy Does Own All Training Courses:DoD Executive AgentITROSCETPOther ServicesImplementation of Block Learning to Commence in FY17Future Delivery IssuesBlock Learning May Result in Multiple CINs and CDPsSecurity Clearances
14
Slide15Way-Ahead
Learning Centers Provide Specified Courseware for Block LearningInitial Contract Award (SEP 2015)Team Composition Team TrainingBlock Learning for 77 Ratings (Accession Training)Validate with Requirement SponsorModify Courses to Re-Phase TrainingUpdate SchedulesPerform Assessments, and Adjust Training as RequiredBuild Learning Continuums (Journeyman & Master)
15
Slide16QUESTIONS
16
Slide17BACK-UPS
17
Slide18Validation
Multiple Tiers of Validation
Team Lead with MembersQA Team (N72 and LC) with TeamManagement Team with Multiple TeamsRequirement Sponsor, Rating Lead, and Fleet SME’s with TeamsData Completed and Approved on Spreadsheet Before being Entered into AIM CPMData Added to Master IPRD Task List; Redundant Items IdentifiedConstruct Allows Individual Items to be Added or Deleted
18
Slide19Phased Implementation Plan
Phasing Plan
Pilot DEP Trng
6
FY 16
FY 17
FY 18
FY 19
FY 20
FY 21
Block Learning Build
Content Reengineering
Interim Block
Learning
Mobile, Modularized Learning
6
6
7
7
77
Training in DEP
Pilot DEP Trng
Content Reengineering
Mobile, Modularized Learning
15
15
15
15
Training in DEP
Pilot DEP Trng
Content Reengineering
23
23
23
Training in DEP
Pilot DEP Trng
Content Reengineering
23
23
23
Trng in DEP
Pilot DEP Trng
Content Reengineering
10
10
10
Feedback required by rating & stage to ensure quality maintained
Ratings
transition from B
lock
L
earning
to mobile, modularized
learning as
it is
delivered
Metered approach
Training in DEP
6
Content Validation
Content Validation
Content Validation
In Depth Analysis
12
In Depth Analysis
30
In Depth Analysis
18
In Depth Analysis
17
19
Slide20USFF Proposed Planning GroupsRRL
DEP
Produces a legal, measurable and repeatable DEP training template available for each RRL rating working group to use in their rate’s training continuum designMonitors legislative changes required to authorize training in DEPLiaises with Assessments WG to define MOPs and MOEs for training in DEP
Actions
NETC *OPNAV CNRC NETCUSFF / CPFLegal RepLearning Centers
Members
* Planning Group Lead
OPNAV N1 provides resourcing for Working Group execution (manpower, travel, etc.)
Group
IT Backbone
Distribution
Assessments
Training Delivery Requirements & Acquisition (TDR&A)
NETC *OPNAV USFF / CPFTYCOMSLearning Centers
Supports delivery of IT tools supporting Block Learning, DEP training and learning continuum developmentDevelops mobile learning strategy to support mobile, modular learning for the Sailor of 2025Facilitates requirements development for required RRL IT capabilities in FY17 and beyond
CNPC *OPNAV NETCUSFF */ CPF TYCOMS
USFF *NETC Learning CentersOPNAVCPFTYCOMsSYSCOMsProgram OfficesCNPCAll others with equity in Readiness
Produces a system capable of distributing and tracking Sailors throughout each rate’s career training continuumEnsures RRL distribution is compatible with enlisted advancement processesEnsures RRL distribution is compatible with Readiness reporting mechanisms (DRRS)Integrates Billet-Based Detailing (BBD) into RRL design and execution
Develops comprehensive MOPs and MOEs that provide qualitative and quantitative feedback for Navy Individual Training for all applicable aspects of Readiness (DOTMLPF) into the foreseeable future (extends beyond RRL)Creates a single template for use by all Rating WGs to provide results to the RRL ESC Once implemented for a rating, determines the effectiveness of Block Learning, including the effects on the fleet from mid-tour training and if the Block Learning model produces a better prepared SailorDevelops and implements a means (dashboard product) to provide the overall impact of RRL on each pillar of DOTMLPF
TRAINING DELIVERY REQUIREMENTSStandardizes requirements and execution of learningProvides oversight for all Planning / Working Groups in the design and execution of all RRL Lines of EffortEnsures the design and execution for each Rating WG incorporates effective learning delivery technologies that apply adult learning theory and produce maximum learning transferenceDevelops and publishes guidance for planning, analysis, design development, implementation and evaluation (PADDIE) in support of RRLCoordinates with IT Backbone PG to maintain Instructional Systems Design (ISD) standards and alignment of all training systemsACQUISITIONCoordinates training technology acquisition to maximize shared and re-purposed curriculum contentDevelops processes for operational systems acquisition (platform, system, subsystem, equipment) to ensure NTSP development and review process incorporates approved RRL concepts
NETC *OPNAVOther Training AgentsSYSCOMs (as applicable)NAWC TSDLearning CentersUSFF / CPFTYCOMs
20
Slide21RTC
CDP 6387
MA A SCHOOL
CDP 1981
A School
F
L
E
ET
PFM
CDP 653F
MILITARY WORKING DOGHANDLER CDP 478N
Post A School
Pre A School
59 Days
2 Days
75 Days
77 Days
NMTCDP 982U
2 Days
Five Accession Training Paths: NEC 0000, NEC 2005 (Dog Handler), NEC 90CS (ECS), NEC 90CS + (CDP 09GP or 09XN)Life Skills replaces NMT and PFM in FY16
EXPEDITIONARY COMBAT SKILLSCDP 03PP
26 Days
EXPEDITIONARY COMBAT SKILLSCDP 03PP
26 Days
26 Days
CRF EMB SEC SKILLS
CDP 09GP
COASTAL RIVERINE FORCE EMBARKED SECURITY COMBAT SKILLS (A-062-6200) taught by CORIVGRU 1 & 2
EXPEDITIONARY
COMBAT SKILLSCDP 03PP
26 Days
26 Days
CRF EMB SEC SKILLSCDP 09XN
NEC 0000
NEC 2005
Identify Ratings & Courses Training Path Example
21