/
SAILOR 2025 Ready Relevant Learning SAILOR 2025 Ready Relevant Learning

SAILOR 2025 Ready Relevant Learning - PowerPoint Presentation

test
test . @test
Follow
426 views
Uploaded On 2019-06-21

SAILOR 2025 Ready Relevant Learning - PPT Presentation

Captain John T Dye Jr Nature of Brief Informational Decisional Ready Relevant Learning Initiative Issue Summary Develop Block Learning for 77 Ratings and conduct analysis for 6 pilot ratings to support FY17 Content Reengineering ID: 759447

training learning rating rrl learning training rrl rating block netc dep team analysis content working requirements provide amp esc design days delivery

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "SAILOR 2025 Ready Relevant Learning" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

SAILOR 2025Ready Relevant Learning

Captain John T. Dye Jr.

Slide2

Nature of Brief

Informational

/DecisionalReady, Relevant Learning Initiative

Issue SummaryDevelop Block Learning for 77 Ratings and conduct analysis for 6 pilot ratings to support FY17 Content Re-engineeringEffectively manage contract funding in support of Ready Relevant Learning

Context /AssumptionsBlock Training will utilize existing curriculum, and current training delivery methods and locationsFleet SMEs and Learning Center resources will be available to perform required analysis and validate Block Learning recommendationsContract centrally managed by NETC N7 with dedicated support from NETC N-Codes and Learning Centers NETC N5, N7, LCs, NAVMAC, and the Fleet must partner for Block Learning to succeedPartner with NETC N6 to identify Information Technology required to support Block Learning & the Learning Continuums

Way AheadLearning Centers Provide Specified Courseware for Block LearningContract Award (SEP 2015)Team Composition Team TrainingBlock Learning for 77 Ratings (Accession Training)Validate with Requirement SponsorModify Courses to Re-Phase TrainingUpdate SchedulesPerform Assessments, and Adjust Training as RequiredBuild Learning Continuums (Journeyman & Master)

Ready Relevant Learning

2

Slide3

DefinitionsRRL

BLOCK LEARNING (Interim Step to RRL)The reorganization of current “As Is” training and delivery methods into blocks to be delivered closer to the time of actual use in the performance of duties. Redistribute accession level training courses across the Delayed Entry Program, initial service schools, and first two operational tours. RRL/LEARNING CONTINUUM A learning model that combines self-development, institutional training and operational experience that begins when a Sailor enters the Navy and ends when they retire. The model should provide more relevant, tailored, and engaging learning experiences through a career long continuum of learning that is not location-dependent, but accessed at the point of need. Right Training, Right Time, Right Place.

3

Slide4

RRL

4

CNO Directed, Joint Initiative with USFF, CPF, NETC, CNPC, CNRC, OPNAV Resource Sponsors, TYCOM Reps, Program Offices, SYSCOMs, and NAWCTSD

Initially, Only Applies to NETC Training,

77 Ratings

Analysis Based upon a Standardized, Repeatable, and Defendable

Process to Determine “

Right

Training, Right Time, Right

Place

NETC E2E Process

Using AIM CPM (JDTA, to define the work) and LO Module

Goal is to Achieve a Reduction in “Brick and Mortar” Training for 30% “A” School and 70% “C” School Accession Training

Maximize Re-Use, Re-Purpose, and Reference (R3), “

Eliminate Redundancy”

Mobile Modularized Learning

Leverage Innovative Training Delivery Technologies

Proposal to assign

CCA and CCMM for Common Core Modules (e.g. Basic Electricity, Pumps, Switchboards, Radar Fundamentals, etc...)

Slide5

RRL Content Re-EngineeringPhasing Matrix

5

Slide6

Block LearningProject Workforce

Project Workforce (Government)NETC Project Management Team Project Management (TPOC / ATPOC / 4 Project Leads (QA) (6 member team)Rating Analysis TeamsProgram Analysts (Team Leads for ten project teams) (10 Analysts) Learning Centers Rating Analysis Teams Center Project Lead, Instructional Systems Designer and Rating Lead (3 Analysts) Rating Phasing will determine total commitment at any timeFleet3 to 5 Fleet Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)Project Workforce (Vendor) Management Team (1 Project Manager / 1 ISD Lead)10 Analysis Teams Instructional Systems Specialists (2), Database Management and input (4)

6

Slide7

Collaborative Work Environment (CWE)Centrally Manages Content. Stores Source and Working FilesAllows Learning Center, NETC, and Fleet Requirement Sponsor(s) and SME’s to Review and Discuss Material, and Analyze Results OnlineRepose Comments and Actions Taken, and Maintain Schedules and TimelineRecommended solution is Blackboard, SharePoint to be utilized initially until ATO issues are resolvedContent Planning Module (CPM) - Clean DatabaseTo Establish and Create the Foundation for Future NETC Training Requirements Business Rules, Style Guide and a Properly Structured Database to Achieve Sailor 2025 Requirements is CriticalNETPDTC has Created a New AIM CPM Data Base for Sailor 2025

Create Repository

7

Slide8

Identify Ratings & Courses

8

Learning CenterNumber of RatingsNumber of Rating PathsNumber of Unique CINsCID7CNATT20CSCS9CSF1CSFE7CSS10EODD2NCSC1SLC11SEAL/SWCCSWOS9Totals:77

Slide9

Identify Metrics

Partner with N5 to Create MetricsMetrics to Track Progress of Block Learning for each Rating

9

NAE/N98 CNATT

:

AIRC-AWO

AIRR-AWS

AIRC-AWV

AV-AT-I

AV-AE

AV-AT-O

AIRC-AWF

AN PACT

PR

AD

AZ

AC

AG

AO

AIRR-AWR

AM

AME

AS

ABE

ABF

ABH

SWE/N96 SWOS

:

EM

GSM

MM

EN

DC

MR

FN

PACTGSEHTQMSWE/N96 CSCS:FCICGMOSETBMSTG

NIDE/N2/N6 CID

:

CTI- Korean

 

CTI-

Chinese

 

CTI-

Hebrew

 

CTI-

Persian

 

CTI-

Arabic

 

CTI-

Russian

 

CTI-

Spanish

 

CTM CTN CTR IS IT CTT

Example of a Metrics Chart Cognos can Provide

Slide10

Gather Data

Learning CenterTraining Course Control Document (TCCD), with AnnexesFormal Course ReviewsInstructor Guide, Trainee Guide and Presentation MaterialTesting Plan and AssessmentsNETC N7CETARS CMS and Course DescriptionList of COI’s Necessary for Sailor 2025 Block / AnalysisNAVMACApproved Occupational Standards (OCCSTDs) AcquisitionNavy Training Systems Plan (NTSP)

10

Slide11

Conduct Analysis

Analysis DocumentsTraining Situation Document (TSD) Documents the “As-Is” State of the Courses of InstructionProvides Data to Recommend “Block Learning”Instructional Performance Requirements Document (IPRD)Documents the Work Requirements and Puts Them into ContextProvides Data that Recommends When the Content Should be TrainedCreates the JDTA for Review Instructional Media Requirements Document (IMRD)Identifies Media Requirements, Supports “Rounding the COI Edges Between “Blocks of Learning”Job, Duty, Task Analysis (JDTA) Data Approved Work Requirements in Context in AIM CPM

JDTA Process Modified to Meet Timeline

11

Slide12

USFF Proposed Governance RRL

12

Lines of Effort

Execution

Design

RRL ESC

1-2 Star

RRL ESC

Action Team

O-6 Level

R3B

FCRC

4 Star

RRL Rating Review

Working Groups

O-6 Level

One WG per rate

Conducts pilot programs

for each rate

prior to full implementation of block learning phase for that rate

Responsible for assessing impacts to readiness

Decisional

The FCRC will make final judgment on the RRL pilot and determine if RRL is applied to other rates

R3B and FCRC will provide strategic oversight and make determinations where RRL changes will impact Readiness

RRL ESC is the Flag/SES decisional body for the tactical and operational levels; all Design WGs and Rating Review WGs will brief the ESC

RRL ESC Action Team aggregates information coming out of the ESC for presentation to the R3B and the FCRC

Assessments

RRL-Wide Planning Groups

RRL Rating Review

Working Groups

O-6 Level

One WG per rate

Owns RRL for each specific rate

Manages the rate through the RRL process

Design solution options for each functional area that will be applied to all RRL rates

Provide direct liaison with individual Rating Review WGs

Training Delivery Requirements & Acquisition

Foundational

Block Learning

Content Reengineering

Mobile Modularized Learning

Integration Working Group

Coordinates RRL impact across all Navy and DoD systems and processes (e.g. DRRS, CeTARS, FLTMPS, NTSP, 3M, ITRO, etc.)

Identify resources required to update systems and processes to ensure compatibility with RRL

Integration of RRL to external Navy processes

Distribution

Assessments

DEP

IT Backbone

Resourcing

Navy Capability Board (NCB)

Determines resources required at each phase of RRL

Works within individual warfare area process to provide solutions for their aligned rates

OPNAV N80/N10

Resource Sponsors

USFF/CPF

Slide13

USFF Proposed DecisionalRRL

Members

NETC *USFF *CPF TYCOM

Per COMPACFLT / COMUSFLTFORCOMINST 5000.1A

Responsibilities

Filters briefs coming up from the Design and Rating Review Working Groups prior to delivery to the ESCAggregates information and decisions coming out of the ESC for follow-on presentation to the R3B and FCRCMaintains RRL Battle RhythmProvides status to NCB as requested (quarterly/semiannually)Serves as conduit between various working/planning groupsDirect the development of a charter and approve for each Planning Working Group

CPF and CUFFC co-chair the FCRCFCRC provides strategic oversight of RRL and makes decisions on recommendations forwarded and vetted by the R3BSupported TYCOM represents the integrated voice of their warfare community to the FCRC for RRL

RRL ESC

1-2 Star

RRL ESC

Action Team

O-6 Level

R3B

FCRC

USFF *

CPF

CNETC *

CNPC

OPNAV Resource SponsorsTYCOM Reps

Flag / SES decisional body for RRL operational and tactical-level issuesAll Design Planning Groups and Rating Review Working Groups will brief the ESCInforms R3B/FCRC of decisions madeForwards the following to R3B/FCRC for final decision:Concurrence to shift each rating to Block LearningConcurrence to secure legacy training for each rating

* Co-Chair

OPNAV N1 provides resourcing for Working Group execution (manpower, travel, etc.)

13

Slide14

ChallengesBlock Learning

NETC/Navy Does Own All Training Courses:DoD Executive AgentITROSCETPOther ServicesImplementation of Block Learning to Commence in FY17Future Delivery IssuesBlock Learning May Result in Multiple CINs and CDPsSecurity Clearances

14

Slide15

Way-Ahead

Learning Centers Provide Specified Courseware for Block LearningInitial Contract Award (SEP 2015)Team Composition Team TrainingBlock Learning for 77 Ratings (Accession Training)Validate with Requirement SponsorModify Courses to Re-Phase TrainingUpdate SchedulesPerform Assessments, and Adjust Training as RequiredBuild Learning Continuums (Journeyman & Master)

15

Slide16

QUESTIONS

16

Slide17

BACK-UPS

17

Slide18

Validation

Multiple Tiers of Validation

Team Lead with MembersQA Team (N72 and LC) with TeamManagement Team with Multiple TeamsRequirement Sponsor, Rating Lead, and Fleet SME’s with TeamsData Completed and Approved on Spreadsheet Before being Entered into AIM CPMData Added to Master IPRD Task List; Redundant Items IdentifiedConstruct Allows Individual Items to be Added or Deleted

18

Slide19

Phased Implementation Plan

Phasing Plan

Pilot DEP Trng

6

FY 16

FY 17

FY 18

FY 19

FY 20

FY 21

Block Learning Build

Content Reengineering

Interim Block

Learning

Mobile, Modularized Learning

6

6

7

7

77

Training in DEP

Pilot DEP Trng

Content Reengineering

Mobile, Modularized Learning

15

15

15

15

Training in DEP

Pilot DEP Trng

Content Reengineering

23

23

23

Training in DEP

Pilot DEP Trng

Content Reengineering

23

23

23

Trng in DEP

Pilot DEP Trng

Content Reengineering

10

10

10

Feedback required by rating & stage to ensure quality maintained

Ratings

transition from B

lock

L

earning

to mobile, modularized

learning as

it is

delivered

Metered approach

Training in DEP

6

Content Validation

Content Validation

Content Validation

In Depth Analysis

12

In Depth Analysis

30

In Depth Analysis

18

In Depth Analysis

17

19

Slide20

USFF Proposed Planning GroupsRRL

DEP

Produces a legal, measurable and repeatable DEP training template available for each RRL rating working group to use in their rate’s training continuum designMonitors legislative changes required to authorize training in DEPLiaises with Assessments WG to define MOPs and MOEs for training in DEP

Actions

NETC *OPNAV CNRC NETCUSFF / CPFLegal RepLearning Centers

Members

* Planning Group Lead

OPNAV N1 provides resourcing for Working Group execution (manpower, travel, etc.)

Group

IT Backbone

Distribution

Assessments

Training Delivery Requirements & Acquisition (TDR&A)

NETC *OPNAV USFF / CPFTYCOMSLearning Centers

Supports delivery of IT tools supporting Block Learning, DEP training and learning continuum developmentDevelops mobile learning strategy to support mobile, modular learning for the Sailor of 2025Facilitates requirements development for required RRL IT capabilities in FY17 and beyond

CNPC *OPNAV NETCUSFF */ CPF TYCOMS

USFF *NETC Learning CentersOPNAVCPFTYCOMsSYSCOMsProgram OfficesCNPCAll others with equity in Readiness

Produces a system capable of distributing and tracking Sailors throughout each rate’s career training continuumEnsures RRL distribution is compatible with enlisted advancement processesEnsures RRL distribution is compatible with Readiness reporting mechanisms (DRRS)Integrates Billet-Based Detailing (BBD) into RRL design and execution

Develops comprehensive MOPs and MOEs that provide qualitative and quantitative feedback for Navy Individual Training for all applicable aspects of Readiness (DOTMLPF) into the foreseeable future (extends beyond RRL)Creates a single template for use by all Rating WGs to provide results to the RRL ESC Once implemented for a rating, determines the effectiveness of Block Learning, including the effects on the fleet from mid-tour training and if the Block Learning model produces a better prepared SailorDevelops and implements a means (dashboard product) to provide the overall impact of RRL on each pillar of DOTMLPF

TRAINING DELIVERY REQUIREMENTSStandardizes requirements and execution of learningProvides oversight for all Planning / Working Groups in the design and execution of all RRL Lines of EffortEnsures the design and execution for each Rating WG incorporates effective learning delivery technologies that apply adult learning theory and produce maximum learning transferenceDevelops and publishes guidance for planning, analysis, design development, implementation and evaluation (PADDIE) in support of RRLCoordinates with IT Backbone PG to maintain Instructional Systems Design (ISD) standards and alignment of all training systemsACQUISITIONCoordinates training technology acquisition to maximize shared and re-purposed curriculum contentDevelops processes for operational systems acquisition (platform, system, subsystem, equipment) to ensure NTSP development and review process incorporates approved RRL concepts

NETC *OPNAVOther Training AgentsSYSCOMs (as applicable)NAWC TSDLearning CentersUSFF / CPFTYCOMs

20

Slide21

RTC

CDP 6387

MA A SCHOOL

CDP 1981

A School

F

L

E

ET

PFM

CDP 653F

MILITARY WORKING DOGHANDLER CDP 478N

Post A School

Pre A School

59 Days

2 Days

75 Days

77 Days

NMTCDP 982U

2 Days

Five Accession Training Paths: NEC 0000, NEC 2005 (Dog Handler), NEC 90CS (ECS), NEC 90CS + (CDP 09GP or 09XN)Life Skills replaces NMT and PFM in FY16

EXPEDITIONARY COMBAT SKILLSCDP 03PP

26 Days

EXPEDITIONARY COMBAT SKILLSCDP 03PP

26 Days

26 Days

CRF EMB SEC SKILLS

CDP 09GP

 COASTAL RIVERINE FORCE EMBARKED SECURITY COMBAT SKILLS (A-062-6200) taught by CORIVGRU 1 & 2

EXPEDITIONARY

COMBAT SKILLSCDP 03PP

26 Days

26 Days

CRF EMB SEC SKILLSCDP 09XN

NEC 0000

NEC 2005

Identify Ratings & Courses Training Path Example

21