EMILE DURKHEIM & TALCOTT PARSONS - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

EMILE DURKHEIM & TALCOTT PARSONS

EARLY FUNCTIONALISTS:

1Slide2

EMILE DURKHEIM (1858-1917)

The Sociology that we know today is as a result of the works of Emile Durkheim.Like Comte, and other academics at the time, Durkheim was alarmed at the chaos he saw in society.

It was important therefore, to scientifically observe and study this society and the social dynamics to find out what was going on.

2Slide3

While

Auguste Comte left the field of Sociology into disrepute, Durkheim attempted to re-establish the discipline.He therefore became the first French academic Sociologist. It was no easy task.

Durkheim, like most early Sociologists were all academic men but were still considered by their colleagues as intruders representing a discipline that had little claim to legitimate status.

3Slide4

He had a lot of work to do in order to make Sociology a discipline in its own right.

The very first attempt Durkheim made was to reduce the micro view of biology & psychology to explain social phenomena. Rather, he decided to look at structures (institutions, norms & values), which for him determined mankind’s social problems.

Thus, Durkheim was also the first to successfully apply the macro theory of Sociology.

4Slide5

Durkheim’s main contributions to Sociology:

Functionalism Mechanical & Organic SolidaritySocial FactsCollective Conscience

AnomieReligion Suicide

5Slide6

FUNCTIONALISM

Emile Durkheim is the founding father of Functionalism.Functionalism is a theory in society that promotes the view that everything is functional, necessary, positive and beneficial albeit in small quantities in some cases.

They believe that parts of society continue to persist only if they served useful functions.If not, they become obsolete.

6Slide7

COLLECTIVE CONSCIENCE

A Collective Conscience is a shared moral code that shapes individual consciousness.

Societies need this collective conscience (or shared morality) in order to function successfully. Durkheim believed that EVERYONE in society shares some of the same ideas.

7Slide8

solidarity

TYPE

OF SOLIDARITY

TYPE OF SOCIETYMECHANICALPRE-MODERN

(AGRARIAN)

ORGANIC

MODERN (INDUSTRIAL)

8Slide9

Whereas the rest of the intellectuals and philosophers at the time opposed

individualism, Durkheim promoted it.In his first book “The Division of

Labour in Society” (1893), Durkheim explored the sources of order and stability in the modern world. For him, selfish people need one another to survive.

9Slide10

Division of Labour

is the manner in which labour is allocated to various people.In a traditional society, one person would have many tasks to do.

In a modern society, one person would usually do one task and duties are specialised.

10Slide11

Mechanical Solidarity

– This occurred in the traditional (agricultural) society. In these societies, everyone did similar tasks and many of the interests in the society would coincide with each other. We would all need each other.

This likeness was important because this mechanical solidarity (unity) would have led the society to share a collective conscience (similar values, goals, norms, ideas and beliefs).It was deemed mechanical by Durkheim because the community functioned together like a simple machine.

11Slide12

Now while this may have been a good thing and this may have held pre-modern societies together, there would also have been negative implications.

For example, in pre-industrial Europe, there would have been many farm lands. These farms would raise sheep, cows, chickens and grow several crops (maize & barley). Several people would be doing the same kind of job and rearing the same kind of animals and plants. If there was a drought, then the entire society would result in chaos because it would bring catastrophe to the entire group.

12Slide13

Organic Solidarity – This occurs in the modern industrial type of society.

In this type of society, everyone is selfish.The division of

labour is distinct and specialised.Everyone is responsible for doing their task and their task alone.

They do not interfere in another person’s job. 13Slide14

The society is more diversified and people are executing different tasks thus their interests are different.

If there is a high crime rate, and party promoters are negatively affected, security firms may be positively affected as there is a greater demand for these companies.

As the division of labour in society became more complex, people became more different and so too did their interests, values, etc.

14Slide15

So if the collective conscience was no longer holding society together as much as it used to, what was?

Durkheim believed that being different would not mean an end to group solidarity, rather as people became more specialized and different, they grew more dependent on each other.

Whereas people were held together in traditional societies by being similar, it was actually dissimilarity that kept them together in modern societies. Therefore, the solidarity became more fluid and natural (hence the term organic).

15Slide16

So no matter how free and individualistic we wanted to be in modern society, we have no choice but to maintain social ties as we are linked to the bigger institutions and structures in the society.

In his book “the Division of Labour in Society,” Durkheim argued that the way that modern society is divided forces people to interact and maintain social relationships with one another.

16Slide17

Durkheim actually was able to make an important discovery about the relationship between social solidarity & division of

labour and even identified the key to understanding things sociologically. This notion was to focus not on the psychological and biological attributes of individuals but on the nature of society itself which includes the institutions.

17Slide18

Therefore, the main discovery for Durkheim at this juncture in his research was:

Social phenomena actually do exist!

18Slide19

Social facts

Durkheim defined Sociology as “the scientific study of social facts or phenomena.”Social facts are those things in society that transcend or are bigger than individuals.

Social facts were the domain of Sociology.He believed that people were constrained by social facts: ways of acting, thinking and feeling in a society.

19Slide20

Social facts were caused by other social facts (e.g. the influence of religion on suicide rates) but could also be explained in terms of the functions they performed for society.

Social facts could not be determined by individual facts or exceptions, rather it is becomes a scientific fact because there is an observable trend confirming it as a truth or reality.

20Slide21

anomie

Modern industrial societies could be disrupted by the existence of anomie (

state of normlessness) and egoism (where individuals are not integrated into social groups). Both of these stemmed from a complex division of labour

. People did specialised jobs, and this weakened solidarity in society.For Durkheim, too much negativity could bring instability & disrupt the social order & stability.

21Slide22

For Durkheim, men were creatures with insatiable wants.

These desires could only be held in check by external societal controls.When social regulations break down, the controlling influence of society on individual propensities is no longer effective and individuals are left to their own devices.

Such a state of affairs Durkheim calls anomie, a term that refers to a condition of relative normlessness in a whole society or in some of its component groups.

Anomie does not refer to a state of mind, but to a property of the social structure. It characterizes a condition in which individual desires are no longer regulated by common norms and where, as a consequence, individuals are left without moral guidance in the pursuit of their goals.

22Slide23

Durkheim believed that total anomie is impossible.

For him, anomie usually occurs when there is drastic social change.Rapid social change may create anomie either in the whole society or in some parts of it (e.g. Economic Depression

).Durkheim (like most Functionalists) does not like social change and if it must occur, he prefers evolutionary change.

23Slide24

SUICIDE

Durkheim was most famous for his study on suicide.It was the first sociological study ever conducted which is why it was so famous.

Suicide focused on a large amount of statistics from various sources, thus attempting to prove to the world that one could scientifically study the phenomenon of any social issue.

24Slide25

Some of Durkheim’s assumptions:

Suicide exists in ALL societies around the world.

Therefore suicide was “normal” or a regular occurrence.He rationed that the reason for high rates of suicide was not individualistic and blamed disintegrating forces at work in the social structure.

Therefore, the rates of suicide could help determine the reason for suicide.He argued there were many types of suicide.

25Slide26

TYPES OF SUICIDE

Emile Durkheim classified different types of suicides on the basis of different types of relationship between the actor and his society.

1) Egoistic suicide: According to Durkheim, when a man becomes socially isolated or feels that he has no place in the society he destroys himself. This is the suicide of

self-centred person who lacks altruistic feelings and is usually cut off from mainstream of the society.2) Altruistic suicide

:

This type of suicide occurs when individuals and the group are too close and intimate. This kind of suicide results from the over integration of the individual into social proof, for example – hari-kari and Hindu wives’ figurative suicide ritual.

3)

Anomic suicide

:

This type of suicide is due to certain breakdown of social equilibrium, such as, suicide after bankruptcy or after winning a lottery. In other words, anomic suicide takes place in a situation which has cropped up suddenly.

4)

Fatalistic suicide

:

This type of suicide is due to overregulation in society. Under the overregulation of a society, when a servant or slave commits suicide, when a barren woman commits suicide, it is the example of fatalistic suicide

26Slide27

Durkheim concluded that:

Suicide rates are higher in men than women (although married women who remained childless for a number of years ended up with a high suicide rate).Suicide rates are higher for those who are single than those who are married.

Suicide rates are higher for people without children than people with children.Suicide rates are higher among Protestants than Catholics and Jews.

27Slide28

Suicide rates are higher among soldiers than civilians.

Suicide rates are higher in times of peace than in times of war.Suicide rates are higher in Scandinavian countries and Japan.

The higher the education level, the more likely it was that an individual would commit suicide; however Durkheim established that there is more correlation between an individual's religion and suicide rate than an individual's education level; Jewish people were generally highly educated but had a low suicide rate.

28Slide29

RELIGION

29Slide30

For Durkheim, religion had the most important influence in society.

The Elementary Forms of Religious Life (1912), is regarded as one of Durkheim’s best and most mature works.In this case study, Durkheim investigated the Australian Aborigines.

His conclusion from this study was that religion was social which emerge from collective representations and realities.

30Slide31

For Durkheim, religion served the following purposes:

It provided for a meaning of lifeIt produced solidarity (especially in societies with mechanical solidarity and to a lesser extent but still important to those with organic solidarity)

It reinforced morals and social norms held collectively by members of the societyIt gave individuals a sense of belongingIt provided authority figures for the society

It provided social control, cohesion and purposeIt presented a means of communication & gathering of individuals to reaffirm social norms

31Slide32

Durkheim’s other main purpose of conducting his research was to find commonalities of religions across the world.

He posited that ALL religions were divided into the sacred and the

profane. Although these views may have been different, they were similar in the sense that they both needed each other in order to survive.

32Slide33

DURKHEIM’S RELEVANCE TO T&T

Do you think that Durkheim’s contributions are relevant to understanding contemporary society in Trinidad and Tobago?

33Slide34

TALCOTT PARSONS (1902 – 1979)

The American Sociologist’s Contributions to Sociology:Founder of Structural Functionalism

Functional Pre-requisitesPattern VariablesSexual Division of Labour

34Slide35

STRUCTURAL FUNCTIONALISM

Parsons believed that all societies needed a value consensus

based upon shared goals.Societies developed rules based upon this value consensus and norms about how people should behave, which fitted in with overall goals.Where individuals are socialized to accept the values, goals and norms and where this works smoothly,

social equilibrium is achieved.

35Slide36

FUNCTIONAL PRE-REQUISITES

Parsons saw society as a system with four basic needs or functional pre-requisites:

Goal AttainmentAdaptationIntegrationLatency (Pattern Maintenance)

36Slide37

Goal Attainment

– The Government or political systems

are responsible for setting goals.Adaptation – The

economy is the main institution concerned with this function.Integration – Adjustment and conflict in society is maintained by the

legal system

or the law.

Latency

(Pattern Maintenance) – maintenance of basic patterns or norms/values in society.

Socializers

or institutions responsible for socialization perform this role. For example –

family, education, religion

. Religion was the most important for Parsons.

37Slide38

FUNCTIONAL PRE-REQUISITES

(BASIC NEEDS)INSTITUTION(S)

GOAL ATTAINMENTGOVERNMENTADAPTATION

ECONOMY

INTEGRATION

LEGAL SYSTEM

LATENCY (PATTERN MAINTENANCE)

FAMILY, RELIGION, EDUCATION

38Slide39

Pattern Variables – in order to understand how society changed and evolved over time, Parsons compared traditional and modern societies by using

Pattern Variables A and Pattern Variables B

.

TRADITIONAL SOCIETY

MODERN SOCIETY

PATTERN VARIABLES

39Slide40

He saw a shift in the

values of people from Pattern Variables A  Pattern Variables B.

PATTERN VARIABLES A

(TRADITIONAL)

PATTERN VARIABLES B

(MODERN)

Ascription

(STATUS)

Achievement

Diffuseness

(ROLE)

Specificity

Particularism

(FAVOUR)

Universalism

Affectivity

(GRATIFICATION)

Neutrality

Collective-orientation

(INTERESTS)

Self-orientation

40Slide41

SEXUAL DIVISION OF LABOUR

Parsons viewed that there was a specific division of

labour (i.e. how people worked and what tasks people did) based on their sex.Males were therefore responsible for executing particular tasks because it was only natural and in their biological state that they should do so.

Females, on the other hand, because of their fragile state and biological difference, were limited to a particular set of duties and responsibilities.

41Slide42

TALCOTT PARSONS’ relevance to t&t

Do you think that Parson’s contributions are more relevant to understanding contemporary society in Trinidad and Tobago than Durkheim’s theories?

42Slide43

BIBLIOGRAPHY

McIntyre, Lisa. 2006.

The Practical Skeptic: Core Concepts in Sociology. 3rd Ed. New York, NY: Mc Graw Hill.

Haralambos, M. & Holborn, M. 2000. Sociology: Themes and Perspectives. 5th

Ed. London: Harper Collins.

Cardiff University: School of Social Sciences. 2010. “Introduction to Sociology: Emile Durkheim.” Accessed 9

th

February 2014

http://www.cf.ac.uk/socsi/undergraduate/introsoc/durkheim1.html

.

43