/
Module 39 Contemporary Perspectives on Personality Module 39 Contemporary Perspectives on Personality

Module 39 Contemporary Perspectives on Personality - PowerPoint Presentation

trish-goza
trish-goza . @trish-goza
Follow
382 views
Uploaded On 2018-11-08

Module 39 Contemporary Perspectives on Personality - PPT Presentation

391 HOW DO PSYCHOLOGISTS USE TRAIT THEORIES TO DESCRIBE PERSONALITY Trait theorists see personality as a stable and enduring pattern of behavior They describe differences rather than trying to ID: 722257

traits personality social theories personality traits theories social trait behavior cognitive people esteem exploring big situations one

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Module 39 Contemporary Perspectives on P..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Module 39

Contemporary Perspectives on PersonalitySlide2

39-1:

HOW DO PSYCHOLOGISTS USE TRAIT THEORIES TO DESCRIBE PERSONALITY?

Trait theorists see personality as a stable and enduring pattern of behavior They describe differences rather than trying to explain themDescribe personality in terms of fundamental traits, characteristic patterns of behavior or ways of feeling and acting, as assessed by self-report inventories and peer reports.

Contemporary Perspectives on Personality

Trait TheoriesSlide3

Classifying people as one or another distinct personality type fails to capture their

full individuality

since we are each a unique combination of multiple traits; better to place personality on several trait dimensions.Factor AnalysisUse factor analysis to identify clusters of behavior tendencies that occur together.Statistical procedure used to identify clusters of test items to tap basic components of a trait, such as extraversion.

Eysenck

Personality Questionnaire developed by Hans Eysenck and Sybil Eysenck to reduce many of our normal individual variations:Analyzed results revealed extraversion and emotionality as basic personality dimensions.The Eysencks believed, and research confirms, that these basic factors are genetically influenced.

Trait Theories

Exploring TraitsSlide4

Trait Theories

Exploring Traits

Two Personality DimensionsSlide5

Biology and Personality

Genetic

predispositions influence many traits.Brain-activity scans of extraverts indicate they seek stimulation because normal brain arousal is relatively low.Dopamine and dopamine-related neural activity tend to be higher in extraverts.Twin and adoption studies show genetic influence on temperament and behavioral styles.Quiet people may be influenced by a reactive autonomic nervous system, making them respond to stress with greater anxiety and inhibition.Trait Theories

Exploring TraitsSlide6

39-2:

WHAT ARE SOME COMMON MISUNDERSTANDINGS ABOUT INTROVERSION? DOES EXTRAVERSION LEAD TO GREATER

SUCCESS THN INTROVERSION?Introversion is often misunderstood as shyness, but introverted people often simply seek low levels of stimulation from their environment.Many studies have surprisingly shown no correlation between extraversion and salesMany introverts prosperIntroversion in not a sign of weakness

Trait Theories

Exploring TraitsThe Stigma of IntroversionSlide7

39-3:

WHAT ARE PERSONALITY INVENTORIES, AND WHAT ARE THEIR STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES AS TRAIT-ASSESSMENT TOOLS?

Personality inventory: Questionnaire on which people respond to items designed to gauge a wide range of feelings and behaviors; used to assess selected personality traits.Test items on some but not all personality inventories are empirically derived, and tests objectively scored. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) is the most widely researched and clinically used of all personality tests. Originally developed to identify emotional disorders (still considered its most appropriate use), this test is now used for many other screening purposes.

Translated into 100+ languages.Trait TheoriesAssessing TraitsSlide8

39-4:

WHICH TRAITS SEEM TO PROVIDE THE MOST USEFUL INFORMATION ABOUT PERSONALITY VARIATION?

The Big Five personality factors (Costa and McCrae, 2011) currently offer the most widely accepted picture of the basic dimensions of personalityConscientiousnessAgreeablenessNeuroticismOpennessExtraversion

Memory tip for the five dimensions: CANOE

Trait TheoriesThe Big Five FactorsSlide9

Big Five research questions:

How

stable are these traits?How heritable are they?Do traits reflect differing brain structure?Have these traits changed over time?How well do these traits apply to various cultures?Do the Big Five traits predict our actual behaviors?Trait TheoriesThe Big Five FactorsSlide10

Researchers use self-report inventories and peer reports to assess and score the Big Five personality

factors.

THE “BIG FIVE” PERSONALITY FACTORSSlide11

39-5:

DOES RESEARCH SUPPORT THE CONSISTENCY OF PERSONALITY TRAITS OVER TIME AND ACROSS SITUATIONS?

Are our personality traits stable and enduring?The Person-Situation ControversyBehavior is influenced by the interaction of our inner disposition with our environment.In general, personality traits are stable, socially significant.Personality traits are predictors of mortality, divorce, and occupational attainment.

Consistency of specific

behaviors from one situation to another is weak; average behaviors are predictableAt any moment the immediate situation powerfully influences a person’s behavior.Our enduring traits are evident, however, across many situations and in such things as our music preferences, our online spaces, and our written communications.

Trait Theories

Evaluating Trait TheoriesSlide12

39-6:

HOW DO SOCIAL-COGNITIVE THEORISTS VIEW PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT, AND HOW DO THEY EXPLORE BEHAVIOR?

The social-cognitive perspective on personality was proposed by Albert Bandura (1986, 2006, 2008)Views behavior as influenced by the interaction between people’s traits (including their thinking) and their social contextEmphasizes interaction of our traits with our situations Applies principles of learning, cognition, and social behavior to personality

Social-Cognitive TheoriesSlide13

Bandura

views the person-environment interaction as

reciprocal determinism:The interacting influences of behavior, internal cognition, and environment.Interaction of individuals and environments:Different people choose different environments.Personalities shape how people interpret and react to events.Personalities help create situations to which people react.

Social-Cognitive Theories

Reciprocal InfluencesSlide14

Social-Cognitive Theories

Reciprocal InfluencesSlide15

Social-Cognitive Theories

Reciprocal Influences

The

Biopsychosocial Approach

to the Study of PersonalitySlide16

To

predict behavior, social-cognitive

theorists often observe behavior in realistic situations:Build on concepts of learning and cognition.Assessment center strategies adopted by many educational, military, and corporate organizations to assess potential candidates. Modern research suggests assessment center exercises are more likely to reveal visible dimensions, such as communication ability, than others, such as inner achievement drive.Social-cognitive psychologists contend that the best way to predict behavior in a given situation is to observe that behavior in similar situations.

Social-Cognitive Theories

Assessing Behavior in SituationsSlide17

39-7: WHAT CRITICISMS HAVE SOCIAL-COGNITIVE THEORISTS FACED?

Social-cognitive theories of personality

have been criticized for focusing so much on the situation that they fail to appreciate the person’s inner traits. Criticized for underemphasizing the importance of unconscious motives, emotions, and biologically influenced traits.Personality traits have been shown to predict behavior at work, love, and play.Social-Cognitive Theories

Evaluating Social-Cognitive TheoriesSlide18

39-8:

WHY HAS PSYCHOLOGY GENERATED SO MUCH RESEARCH ON THE SELF? HOW IMPORTANT IS SELF-ESTEEM TO OUR WELL-BEING?

Exploration of the self in psychology has a long history:William James (1890)Gordon Allport (1943)Humanistic psychology (1960s)

Self:

In contemporary psychology, assumed to be the center of personality, the organizer of our thoughts, feelings, and actions.Self one of psychology’s most vigorously studied topics.Spotlight effect:

Overestimating others

’ noticing and evaluating our appearance, performance, and

blunders

(

as if we presume a spotlight shines on us).

Consideration of

possible selves

motivates toward positive development; too intense focusing may lead to

spotlight effect

.

Exploring the SelfSlide19

Self-esteem

:

One’s feelings of high or low self-worth.Self-efficacy: One’s sense of competence and effectiveness.High self-esteem correlates with less pressure to conform, with persistence at difficult tasks, and with happiness. But the direction of the correlation is not clear; high self-esteem could simply be a side effect of meeting challenges and surmounting difficulties .

Giving

praise in the absence of good performance may actually be harmful.Temporarily deflating study participants’ self-image tends to have negative effects in how those individuals treat others.Exploring the SelfThe Benefits of Self-EsteemSlide20

39-9:

WHAT EVIDENCE REVEALS SELF-SERVING BIAS, AND HOW DO DEFENSIVE AND SECURE SELF-ESTEEM DIFFER?

Self-serving bias: A readiness to perceive oneself favorablySuggests people accept more responsibility for good deeds than for bad, and for successes than for failureOften creates a better-than-average effectWhen self-esteem is threatened, people may react aggressivelyNarcissism: Excessive self-love and self-absorptionResearchers

distinguish between fragile

defensive self-esteem and stronger secure self-esteem, which is less dependent upon external evaluationAuthentic pride, rooted in actual achievement, supports self-confidence and leadershipExploring the SelfSelf-Serving BiasSlide21

39-10:

HOW

DO INDIVIDUALIST AND COLLECTIVIST CULTURES DIFFER IN THEIR VALUES AND GOALS?Individualism: Giving priority to one’s own goals over group goals and defining one’s identity in terms of personal attributes rather than group identifications.Collectivism: Giving priority to the goals of one’s group (often one’s extended family or work group) and defining one’s identity accordingly.

Although people within cultures vary, different cultures emphasize either individualism or collectivism. Individualism is valued in most areas of North America, Western Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. People in many Asian, African, and Latin American countries place a higher value on collectivism.

Exploring the SelfCulture and the SelfSlide22

Exploring the Self

Culture and the Self