Evaluation support study on Geographical
Author : alida-meadow | Published Date : 2025-05-23
Description: Evaluation support study on Geographical Indications and Traditional Specialities Guaranteed protected in the EU Final report December 2020 European Commission DG AGRI Introduction objectives Study conducted from December 2019 to
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download
Presentation The PPT/PDF document
"Evaluation support study on Geographical" is the property of its rightful owner.
Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only,
and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all
copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of
this agreement.
Transcript:Evaluation support study on Geographical:
Evaluation support study on Geographical Indications and Traditional Specialities Guaranteed protected in the EU Final report – December 2020 European Commission - DG AGRI Introduction - objectives Study conducted from December 2019 to December 2020 Objectives: provide an evaluation on the EU quality policy on GIs and TSGs protected in the EU, provide answers to 16 evaluation study questions (ESQs) on 5 themes: effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, coherence and EU added value. Introduction – coverage Geographical coverage: EU 28 Period covered: 30 May 2008 to 2020 GIs and TSGs covered (data on the 01/01/2020): 3 286 GIs and TSG registered by MS (3 224 GIs and 62 TSGs) 32 GIs registered by third countries through direct application Sectoral coverage: agricultural products, foodstuffs, spirit drinks, wines and aromatised wine products. Regulatory coverage: Spirit drinks: Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 until 7 June 2019 and Regulation (EU) 2019/787 Since 8 June 2019, Agricultural products and foodstuffs: Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 Wines: Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, Aromatised wine products: Regulation (EU) No 251/2014. Methodology - List of tools Main conclusions by theme Effectiveness ESQs 1 to 5 Effectiveness Fair competition for farmers and producers There are high differences in procedures among the different MS The scrutiny at EU level and the effectiveness of controls in MS ensure fair competition for farmers and producers The high level of legal protection of GI names in the EU and the effectiveness of controls, especially at national level, ensure the protection of IPRs in the EU Controls are assessed to be more effective at upstream stages than at downstream stages Integrity of the market The GI/TSG scheme overall favours the integrity of the market: common reference at EU level The share of intra-EU export of GI products is comparable or higher than the share of intra-EU export of the whole food and drink sector in 5 MS among the 7 largest MS in terms of sales value under GI Limits: low awareness and understanding in some MS, possible requirements on the origin of raw materials True and fair view of the products and authenticity, clear and reliable information to consumers Authenticity provided by both origin of the products (for GIs) and its specificities (based on the product specifications) Several reliable sources of information are available on GIs/TSGs (eAmbrosia, Qualigeo, INAO, producer groups websites) Controls and IPR enforcement are considered effective, even if some weaknesses are observed (retail and export,
