Literature on electronics as distractions 90-97.5%

Literature on electronics as distractions 90-97.5%
1 / 1
Literature on electronics as distractions 90-97.5% - slide 1 of 8 Literature on electronics as distractions 90-97.5% - slide 2 of 8 Literature on electronics as distractions 90-97.5% - slide 3 of 8 Literature on electronics as distractions 90-97.5% - slide 4 of 8 Literature on electronics as distractions 90-97.5% - slide 5 of 8 Literature on electronics as distractions 90-97.5% - slide 6 of 8 Literature on electronics as distractions 90-97.5% - slide 7 of 8 Literature on electronics as distractions 90-97.5% - slide 8 of 8
Literature on electronics as distractions 90-97.5 of students report texting in class; Over 99 while studying 97 report noticing other students misusing phones andor laptops 75 report phones in class are mostly a distraction 10

Related Topics

Download this presentation From Below

"Literature on electronics as distractions 90-97.5%" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Presentation Transcript

01
Literature on electronics as distractions 90-97.5% of students report texting in class;
Over 99% while studying
97% report noticing other students misusing phones and/or laptops
75% report phones in class are “mostly a distraction”
10% report using a phone during an exam
54% believe instructors don’t notice
(Jackson, 2013; Olmstead & Terry, 2014; Tindell & Bohlander, 2012)
Presence and use of a cell phone distracting and associated with:
Poorer performance on assignments and exams
Overall GPA
Higher anxiety and lower satisfaction with life relative to peers who use cell phones less
(End et al., 2010; Froese et al., 2012; Junco & Cotton, 2012; Thorton et al., 2014; Lepp et al., 2014)<br>
02
Literature on electronics as distractions Why so distracting?
Facebook, texting, and instant messaging used most
Social networking main in-class use; less for course-related work outside of taking notes
Habitual texting in other contexts can predict texting in class
Size of classroom impacts students’ perception of ability to use
Students report anxiety in being separated from phones; intrusive thoughts about phone when access is limited
Mere presence of phone impacts students’ attentional capacity and performance on cognitively demanding tasks
(Froese et al., 2012; Junco & Cotten;, 2012; Tindell & Bohlander, 2012; Lepp et al., 2014; Olmstead & Terry, 2014)<br>
03
Literature on electronics as distractions Who cares?
Students acknowledge texting limits ability to pay attention
Students exhibit greater acceptance of cell phone and off-task laptop use in class than faculty
Males more than females; Undergraduates more than graduates
Students believe they can multitask
Students request clearly outlined policies in the syllabus, and consistent enforcement, regardless of the type of policy
(Froese et al., 2012; Tindell & Bohlander, 2012; Junco & Cotton, 2012; Olmstead & Terry, 2014; Jackson, 2013)<br>