Why are the causal effects of shared environment

Published  . 0 views
↓ Download
Why are the causal effects of shared environment
1 / 1
Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 1 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 2 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 3 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 4 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 5 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 6 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 7 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 8 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 9 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 10 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 11 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 12 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 13 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 14 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 15 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 16 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 17 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 18 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 19 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 20 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 21 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 22 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 23 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 24 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 25 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 26 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 27 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 28 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 29 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 30 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 31 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 32 of 33 Why are the causal effects of shared environment - slide 33 of 33
Description: Why are the causal effects of shared environment so small? Paul Lichtenstein, professor Head of department Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Karolinska Institutet, Sweden Outline The question: Why do we care about shared

Related Topics

Download Presentation

"Why are the causal effects of shared environment" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Presentation Transcript

slide1. Why are the causal effects of shared environment so small? Paul Lichtenstein, professor
Head of department
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Karolinska Institutet, Sweden<br>
slide2. Outline The question: Why do we care about shared environment

The method: Twin and family methods

The empirical results: Very little shared environment for psychiatric phenotypes

The meaning: How should we interpret the limited effect of the shared environment?

The conclusion: Life is unfair – should we bother?<br>
slide3. Familial aggregation Lichtenstein et al, 2009, Lancet WHY??
Genes?
Environments?<br>
slide4. 2000 1970 1950 1800 1980 1960 1920 Human genome project Genes Environ-ments Nature or Nuture? After Plomin & Petrill, Intelligence, 1997 Mendel’s inheritance laws rediscovered Reaction to Nazism DNA discovered Left- and environmental concentration on public debate Development of molecular genetics<br>
slide5. The twin method: Correlations<br>
slide6. The twin method: Correlations<br>
slide7. The twin method: Correlations<br>
slide8. The twin method: Correlations<br>
slide9. The Twin method: Model fitting C E C A A MZ = 1.0 DZ = 0.5 1 E e a c c a e<br>
slide10. Sweden best in class Swedish Twin Register

The Multi-Generation Register<br>
slide11. The Multi-Generation Registry Individuals born in Sweden > 1932
N ~ 9 million

Link with biological and adoptive parents
N ~ 15 million<br>
slide12. Pedigrees from the MGR I:1 I:2 II:2 II:3 II:6 II:4 I:3 II:5 II:7 III:2 III:3 III:4 III:8 III:5 III:6 III:7 II:1 III:1 Full siblings Half siblings Full cousins Half cousins<br>
slide13. Extended children-of-twins model (ECOT)<br>
slide14. Percentage of Variance Personality: Meta analyses of twin and adoption studies After Loehlin,1992 Familial aggregation most often due to genetic factors
Environmental effects most often unique for each family member
Shared environment (family environment) small (but significant) effect<br>
slide15. MaTCH MaTCH http://match.ctglab.nl

Contains summary results from 2,748 twin studies
527 studies of the eight PGC disorders<br>
slide16. MaTCH – 8 PGC disorders<br>
slide17. Shared environment - no or small effect Abnormal environment?

What phenotype?

What is shared environment – really?

How much could you expect?

Why are people so provoked?<br>
slide18. Abnormal environment Severe deprivation during early childhood influence development!

Rutter and Romanian adoptees (summarized in JAACAP, 2012)

Severe deprivation
Quasi-autism
Disinhibited attachment
Inattention/overactivity
Cognitive impairment<br>
slide19. Romanian children adopted to British families before and after age 6 months p<.001 Rutter et al, JAACAP , 2012<br>
slide20. What phenotype? Some phenotypes do show clear shared environmental effects

Externalizing behavior
Criminality
Substance abuse

Socioeconomic status<br>
slide21. Frisell et al, Psychol Med , 2011<br>
slide22. Percentage of Variance Convictions for violent criminality Frisell et al, Psychol Med , 2011<br>
slide23. Abuse Twin, sibling and adoption studies (Kendler and Sundqvists) Kendler et al, Psychol Med , 2016<br>
slide24. Andel av variationen Utbildningsnivå i födelsekohorter *Lichtenstein, Pedersen & McClearn, 1992, Acta Sociologica
**Fischbein, Lange & Lichtenstein, 1997, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research Män<br>
slide25. Andel av variationen Utbildningsnivå i födelsekohorter *Lichtenstein, Pedersen & McClearn, 1992, Acta Sociologica
**Fischbein, Lange & Lichtenstein, 1997, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research Män Kvinnor?<br>
slide26. Andel av variationen Utbildningsnivå i födelsekohorter *Lichtenstein, Pedersen & McClearn, 1992, Acta Sociologica
**Fischbein, Lange & Lichtenstein, 1997, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research Män Kvinnor<br>
slide27. What is (shared) environment?<br>
slide28. Percentage of Variance Stressful life events Plomin et al, 1990, Psychol Aging We (our genes) influence our environment
The more controllable – the higher heritability<br>
slide29. Neighborhood deprivation ”is genetic” Sariaslan et al, Transl Psychiatry , 2016<br>
slide30. How about parenting? Parental criticism: Girls 16 year old The child’s genes influence ”parenting”
Evocative gene-environment correlation Narusyte et al, 2007, Europ Child & Adol Psychiatry<br>
slide31. Shared environment - no or small effect Abnormal environment?

What phenotype?

What is shared environment – really?

How much could you expect?

Why are people so provoked?<br>
slide32. Shared environment - no or small effect Abnormal environment?

What phenotype?

What is shared environment – really?

How much could you expect?

Why are people so provoked?<br>
slide33. Conclusion Shared environment have limited effects – especially for severe psychopathology

Does not mean that parenting and treatment are meaningless
No causal effects of shared environment but causal effects of parenting

Life is unfair – would it be better if it was because of the shared environment?<br>