PPT-Explicitness and Inference

Author : yoshiko-marsland | Published Date : 2017-04-20

EXPLICIT If something is EXPLICIT its very clear and we dont need to work it out If its raining its EXPLICIT that people outside are getting wet INFERRED If something

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Explicitness and Inference" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Explicitness and Inference: Transcript


EXPLICIT If something is EXPLICIT its very clear and we dont need to work it out If its raining its EXPLICIT that people outside are getting wet INFERRED If something is INFERRED we work it out from what we know for sure . Presented By: Ms. . Seawright. What does it mean to make an inference?. Make an inference.. Use what you already know.. The inference equation. WHAT I READ. Use quotes from the text and not page number for future references. Chris . Mathys. Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging. UCL. SPM Course (M/EEG). London, May 14, 2013. Thanks to Jean . Daunizeau. and . Jérémie. . Mattout. for previous versions of this talk. A spectacular piece of information. Elisabet Titik Murtisari. Monash University, Australia. etmurtisari@yahoo.com.au . Introduction. The concept of explicitation itself, which is generally understood as ‘the spelling out of information which is otherwise implicit in the source text’, has been of special interest in translation studies because of its elusiveness. Different methods have been applied in the study, e.g. by the use of the discourse based concept of explicitness and the traditional encoded/inferred distinction. The studies, however, are somewhat difficult to compare since every study seems to have its own concept of explicitation. Besides, there is also a issue with the combination of the two notions of explicitness, which is often done in explicitation research. . The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.. What is inference?. What you know + what you read = inference. Uses facts, logic, or reasoning to come to an assumption or conclusion. Asks: “What conclusions can you draw based on what is happening . S. M. Ali Eslami. September 2014. Outline. Just-in-time learning . for message-passing. with Daniel Tarlow, Pushmeet Kohli, John Winn. Deep RL . for ATARI games. with Arthur Guez, Thore Graepel. Contextual initialisation . Protocols for Coreference Resolution. . . Kai-Wei Chang, Rajhans Samdani. , . Alla Rozovskaya, Nick Rizzolo, Mark Sammons. , and Dan Roth. . Kari Lock Morgan. Department of Statistical Science, Duke University. kari@stat.duke.edu. . with Robin Lock, Patti Frazer Lock, Eric Lock, Dennis Lock. ECOTS. 5/16/12. Hypothesis Testing:. Use a formula to calculate a test statistic. Chapter 14 . The pinhole camera. Structure. Pinhole camera model. Three geometric problems. Homogeneous coordinates. Solving the problems. Exterior orientation problem. Camera calibration. 3D reconstruction. Warm up. Share your picture with the people at your table group.. Make sure you have your Science notebook, agenda and a sharpened pencil. use tape to put it in front of your table of contents. Describe the difference between observations and inferences. An.  inference is an idea or conclusion that's drawn from evidence and reasoning. . An . inference.  is an educated . guess.. When reading a passage: 1) Note the facts presented to the reader and 2) use these facts to draw conclusions about . 1. Based on. “Inference . to the Best Explanation: The General . Account”. “Inference . to the Best Explanation: . Examples”. Chapters 8 and 9 in. John D. Norton, . The Material Theory of Induction.. Thesis defense . 4/5/2012. Jaesik Choi. Thesis Committee: . Assoc. Prof. Eyal Amir (Chair, Director of research). Prof. Dan Roth. . Prof. Steven M. Lavalle. Prof. David Poole (University of British Columbia). Chapter . 2 . Introduction to probability. Please send errata to s.prince@cs.ucl.ac.uk. Random variables. A random variable . x. denotes a quantity that is uncertain. May be result of experiment (flipping a coin) or a real world measurements (measuring temperature). Adapted from Patrick J. Hurley, . A Concise Introduction to Logic. (Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth, 2008).. Predicate Logic. Before I go on to explain quantifiers, first let me address different ways of symbolizing statements. Previously, we used one letter to symbolize one statement. But there is another way to symbolize certain kinds of statements that are relevant to quantifiers. We can also symbolize statements by symbolizing the predicate and subject separately. .

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Explicitness and Inference"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents