Hemangiopericytoma Spectrum in Brain Head amp Neck and SpinePathological Correlations Kwofie M 1 Moritani T 1 Vijapura C 1 Kademian J 1 Kirby P 2 1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City IA ID: 540940
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Imaging of Solitary Fibrous Tumor/" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Imaging of Solitary Fibrous Tumor/Hemangiopericytoma Spectrum in Brain, Head & Neck, and Spine—Pathological Correlations
Kwofie
M
1
,
Moritani
T
1
,
Vijapura
C
1
,
Kademian
J
1
, Kirby
P
2
1: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA
2. Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IASlide2
INTRODUCTIONIntracranial solitary fibrous tumors (SFT) and
hemangiopericytomas
(HPC) are generally part of a histologic spectrum of fibroblastic-type mesenchymal
neoplasms, unlike soft tissue counterpart
Based on recent genetic analysis (
NAB2-STAT6
fusion gene), intracranial SFT/HPC are considered a true counterpart of soft tissue SFT/HPC
HPC
of the CNS
have a
recurrence rate reaching >92
% compared to soft tissue SFTSlide3
INTRODUCTIONAccurate diagnosis on imaging has implications for management
Intracranial HPCs are rare as they represent 2 to
4% of
meningeal
tumours
in large series, thus
comprising less
than 1% of all intracranial
tumours
histogenesis
of
intracranial HPC has
been a matter
of controversy
for a long timeSlide4
INTRODUCTIONIntracranial HPC frequently misdiagnosed as meningiomaGeneral agreement
that
intracranial HPC
is more aggressive than
meningioma (greater local recurrence,
extraneural
metastases, irregular or
polylobulated
borders, bone
erosion)Slide5
PURPOSE OF EXHIBITTo describe imaging findings of SFT/HPC in the brain, head & neck, and spine
To describe pathologic correlations
To discuss differential diagnosisSlide6
APPROACHReview SFT/HPC cases at UIHC from 2012 to 2016Review CT and MRI of cases
Review pathology of cases
Compare to recent literature reviewSlide7
CASES: EPIDEMIOLOGY
Sample: living cases SFT/HPC from 2012 to 2016 at UIHC
N: 15
# Male: 6
# Females: 9
Mean Age: 58
Age range: 36-89
# still alive: 14Slide8
CASES: SYMPTOMS AND LOCATION
At least 3 cases were recurrent diseaseSlide9
CASES: PATHOLOGY
Cases 8-11 diagnosed as SFT/HPC spectrumSlide10
HISTOPATHOLOGYSFTs are typically composed
of juxtaposed hyper- and
hypocellular
spindle
cell
proliferation
, dense
collagenous
stroma
, and numerous thin-walled blood vessels with
a staghorn configuration, a histologic
hallmark of
hemangiopericytoma
or
SFTSlide11
HISTOPATHOLOGYSFT have
cellular
component (monotonous appearance and thin-walled branching vessels),
fibrous
component (alternating fibrous areas and
hyalinized
thick-walled vessels), or
both
components with variable
degrees
cellular variant of SFT is indistinguishable from
hemangiopericytomaSlide12
IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRYFibrous SFTStrong CD34 positivity
Bcl-2
and vimentin positivity
and
S100
, actin, and keratin
negativity
cellular
variant of
SFT/HPC
weaker CD34 positivitySlide13
CASES: IMAGING FINDINGOn MRI,
low
T2 signal correlates with fibrous content, and
high
T2 correlates with cellular component
Multicystic
changes and flow voids may be seen
Signal
characteristics on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and low apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) correlate with
cellularity.
Perfusion-weighted
image shows an early enhancement pattern. Slide14
CASES: IMAGING FINDINGOn CT, SFT/HPC are
generally
mildly or moderately
hyperdense
and
enhancing
corresponding to cellular or fibrous componentSlide15
CASES
54-year-old female with dizziness.
Left temporal solitary fibrous tumor WHO grade 2.
(A) Axial CT showing a
hyperdense
medial portion of the lesion
.
(B) Coronal T2 shows
variable high
T2 signal in the lateral portion of the lesion consistent with
cellular components and cystic
changes. (C) and (D)
Axial
and sagittal T1 post contrast, respectively show enhancement. (E) and (F) DWI and ADC, respectively, show focal area of diffusion restrict in the medial aspect of lesion
.Slide16
CASES
54-year-old female with dizziness.
Left temporal solitary fibrous tumor WHO grade 2
.
Tissue
fragments show a cellular proliferation of oval to
spindled, relatively
uniform cells in a swirling pattern, separated by
parallel bundles
of collagen. Occasional thin-walled, dilated vessels
are identified
within the cellular proliferation. The neoplastic cells
stain positively
for vimentin, CD34, CD99, F13a and BCL-2, and negatively
for
synaptophysin
, chromogranin, CD45, CD20, CD3, EMA,
pankeratin
and
S100. Slide17
CASES55 year-old female with history of headaches and depression
. Left temporal anaplastic
hemangiopericytoma
, WHO grade 3.
(A) Axial T2 show lesion with
multicystic
changes. (B) Axial T1 with low signal in areas of cystic changes. (C) S
agittal
T1 post contrast enhancement of the solid components. (D) and (E) DWI and ADC, respectively, with focal area of diffusion restriction in the posterior aspect of lesion
.Slide18
CASES55 year-old female with history of headaches and depression
. Left temporal anaplastic
hemangiopericytoma
, WHO grade 3.
Sections show fragments of cellular tissue containing
numerous vascular
spaces of varying size and shape with occasional vascular
spaces demonstrating
a staghorn-type architecture. The intervening stroma
is densely
cellular, demonstrating spindled to ovoid cells with occasional
pleomorphic nuclei with a haphazard orientation.
Focal
areas
demonstrate a
more solid appearance containing numerous small vascular spaces
and there
are other areas that have greater fibrous stroma associated with
the cells
. Dense fibrous tissue is present along the edge of some fragments
, consistent
with dura. Only rare bits of brain parenchyma are seen along
the edges of some fragments, but no brain invasion per se is identified
. Mitoses
are greater than 5 per 10 high power fields in some areas.
There are
focal aggregates of lymphocytes and a few aggregates of
foamy macrophages
. At the edge of one fragment, there is focal necrosis
associated with hemorrhage. Slide19
CASES55 year-old female with history of headaches and depression
. Left temporal anaplastic
hemangiopericytoma
, WHO grade 3.
The
reticulin
stain shows varying degrees
of
reticulin
deposition throughout the tumor. Vimentin demonstrates
diffuse positivity
.
Immunohistochemical
stains for CD31 and CD34 highlight
the previously
described vascular spaces. In addition, CD34 is
focally positive
within a minority of tumor cells. Factor
XIIIa
demonstrates scattered
positivity within tumor cells and CD57 stain demonstrates
rare positivity
within tumor cells. Staining for EMA shows minimal
weak staining
and an
immunostain
for progesterone receptor shows a very
rare weakly
positive nuclei. Staining for S100, SMSA and
pankeratin
stains
are negative
within the cells of interest. Slide20
CASES43 year-old male with bipolar affective disorder and suicide attempts.
Intraventricular solitary fibrous tumor WHO grade 2
. (A) Axial CT shows
hyperdense
periphery of the lesion. (B) Axial T2 with low and high T2 components corresponding to fibrous and cellular components within the lesion. (C) Axial T1 shows flow voids within lesion. (D) Axial T1 post contrast shows more enhancement of the cellular components compared to the fibrous component. (E)
DWI showed partially restricted diffusion with decreased ADC (ADC not shown).
(F) MR spectroscopy showing low NAA (N-acetyl aspartate
) peak consistent
with tumor of non neuronal
origin,
and
increase
MI
peak which may help
distinguish SFT/HPC from meningioma. MI:
myo
-inositol;
chol
: choline.Slide21
CASES: IMAGING FINDING43 year-old male with bipolar affective disorder and suicide attempts.
Intraventricular solitary fibrous tumor WHO grade 2
.
Sections show
monomorphous
tumor composed of closely packed, randomly
oriented
spindle cells with intervening
fibrocollagenous
to
hypocellular
stroma with interspersed staghorn-type blood vessels. The nuclei are oval
to
elongated with moderately dense chromatin and inconspicuous nucleoli.
The
mitotic activity is up to 1 mitosis/10 high power field. No necrosis,
atypia
or increased cellularity is seen. There is no bone invasion. Slide22
CASES: IMAGING FINDING89 year-old female with a mass in the right brow and diplopia.
Right
sinonasal
malignant solitary fibrous tumor/
hemangiopericytoma
intermediate grade (FNCLCC grade 2/3).
(A) Coronal CT shows erosion of adjacent bone. No calcification within lesion. (B), (C) Coronal T2 andT1 show high and low signals within lesion. (D) Coronal T1 post contrast shows relative enhancement of the periphery of the lesion. (E) DWI shows high signals in the T2 high component and low in fibrous component due to T2 dark through. (F) and (G) H&E stain showing fibrous (F) and cellular components (G), respectively
. Slide23
CASES89 year-old female with a mass in the right brow and diplopia.
Right
sinonasal
malignant solitary fibrous tumor/
hemangiopericytoma
intermediate grade (FNCLCC grade 2/3).
The
mitotic count is 14/10 HPFs. No necrosis is identified.
Immunohistochemical
studies reveal the precursor solitary fibrous tumor to be strongly positive for CD34, with loss of CD34 expression in the more cellular component, consistent with the above diagnosis.
Desmin
is focally positive while
pankeratin
is negative.Slide24
CASES56 year-old male with L3 spinal tumor.
Benign solitary fibrous tumor
. (A) Axial CT lumbar spine at L3 level showing
isodense
mass with remodeling of the left L3 poster elements. (B) Axial T2 shows predominantly low T2 signal within lesion. (C)
Coronal
T1 shows normal bone marrow signal. (D)
Axial
T1 post contrast shows enhancement within lesion
.Slide25
CASES56 year-old male with L3 spinal tumor.
Benign solitary fibrous tumor
.
The
tumor focally
expressed
CD34 with no significant expression of
S100,
neurofilament
, SMSA, SMM, EMA, MUC4, beta-catenin (nuclear), or KIT.Slide26
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSISMeningioma (has calcifications, hyperostosis
, broader
dural
tail favors meningioma)
metastasis
, and
other
primary benign or malignant tumorsSlide27
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONIntracranial SFT
and HPC continue to be regarded as different entities
while soft tissue HPC is considered to be SFT in the latest
version of the WHO CNS tumor classification
.
Intracranial
HPC have a recurrence rate reaching >92% compared to soft tissue SFT
possibly secondary to
genetic difference in NAB
2-STAT6
Intracranial
SFT/HPC form
a histopathologic spectrum
Imaging findings such as l
ow T2 and high T2 signals
correlates with
fibrous, cellular and cystic content of SFT/HPC and are helpful in diagnosisSlide28
REFERENCES1. Shanbhogue
AK, Prasad SR, Takahashi N, et al. Somatic and visceral solitary fibrous tumors in the abdomen and pelvis: cross-sectional imaging spectrum.
Radiographics
2011;31:393-408
2. Wu W, Shi JX, Cheng HL, et al.
Hemangiopericytomas
in the central nervous system.
J
Clin
Neurosci
2009;16:519-523
3.
Maekawa
A,
Kohashi
K, Yamada Y, et al. A case of intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/
hemangiopericytoma
with dedifferentiated component.
Neuropathology
2015;35:260-265
4.
Chiechi
MV,
Smirniotopoulos
JG, Mena H. Intracranial
hemangiopericytomas
: MR and CT features.
AJNR Am J
Neuroradiol
1996;17:1365-1371
5.
Fargen
KM,
Opalach
KJ, Wakefield D, et al. The central nervous system solitary fibrous tumor: a review of clinical, imaging and pathologic findings among all reported cases from 1996 to 2010.
Clin
Neurol
Neurosurg
2011;113:703-710
6. Yuzawa
S, Nishihara H, Wang L,
Tsuda
M, et al. Analysis of NAB2-STAT6 Gene Fusion in 17 Cases of Meningeal Solitary Fibrous Tumor/
Hemangiopericytoma
. Review of Literature.
Am J
Surg
Pathol
.
2016 Feb 26. [
Epub
ahead of print
]
7.
Yalcin
CE,
Tihan
T. Solitary
Fibrous Tumor/
Hemangiopericytoma
Dichotomy Revisited: A Restless Family of Neoplasms in the CNS.
Adv
Analt
Pathol
.
2016
Mar;23(2):104-11